Table of Contents
Can You Drink Tap Water in Redding?
Yes, Redding's tap water is generally considered safe to drink as Redding has no active health based violations of the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) that we are aware of. Other factors such as lead piping in a home, or low levels of pollutants on immunocompromised individuals, should also be considered, however. To find more recent info we might have, you can check out our boil water notice page or the city's water provider website.
According the EPA’s ECHO database, from April 30, 2019 to June 30, 2022, Redding's water utility, City of Redding, had 0 violations of the Safe Drinking Water Act. For more details on the violations, please see our violation history section below. This assessment is based on the City of Redding water system, other water systems in the city may have different results.
While tap water that meets the EPA health guidelines generally won’t make you sick to your stomach, it can still contain regulated and unregulated contaminants present in trace amounts that could potentially cause health issues over the long-run. These trace contaminants may also impact immunocompromised and vulnerable individuals.
The EPA is reviewing if it’s current regulations around pollutant levels in tap water are strict enough, and the health dangers posed by unregulated pollutants, like PFAS.
Water Quality Report for Redding Tap Water
The most recent publicly available numbers for measured contaminant levels in Redding tap water are in its 2020 Water Quality Report. As you can see, there are levels which the EPA considers to be acceptable, but being below the maximum allowable level doesn’t necessarily mean the water is healthy.
Lead in tap water, for example, is currently allowed at up to 15ppb by the EPA, but it has set the ideal goal for lead at zero. This highlights how meeting EPA standards doesn’t necessarily mean local tap water is healthy.
EPA regulations continue to change as it evaluates the long term impacts of chemicals and updates drinking water acceptable levels. The rules around arsenic, as well as, lead and copper are currently being re-evaluated.
There are also a number of "emerging" contaminants that are not currently. For example, PFAS (Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), for which the EPA has issued a health advisory. PFAS are called "forever chemicals" since they tend not to break down in the environment or the human body and can accumulate over time.
We recommend looking at the contaminants present in Redding's water quality reports, or getting your home's tap water tested to see if you should be filtering your water.
Redding Tap Water Safe Drinking Water Act Violation History - Prior 10 Years
Below is a ten year history of violations for the water system named City of Redding for Redding in California. For more details please see the "What do these Violations Mean?" section below.
Is there Lead in Redding Water?
Based on the EPA’s ECHO Database, 90% of the samples taken from the Redding water system, City of Redding, between sample start date and sample end date, were at or below, 0.0 mg/L of lead in Redding water. This is 0% of the 0.015 mg/L action level. This means 10% of the samples taken from Redding contained more lead.
While Redding water testing may have found 0.0 mg/L of lead in its water, that does not mean your water source has the same amount. The amount of lead in water in a city can vary greatly from neighborhood to neighborhood, or even building to building. Many buildings, particularly older ones, have lead pipes or service lines which can be a source of contamination. To find out if your home has lead, we recommend getting you water tested.
No amount of lead in water is healthy, only less dangerous. As lead accumulates in our bodies over time, even exposure to relatively small amounts can have negative health effects. For more information, please check out our Lead FAQ page.
Are there PFAS in Redding Tap Water?
Currently, testing tap water for PFAS isn’t mandated on a national level. We do have a list of military bases where there have been suspected or confirmed leaks. There appears to be no military bases near Redding with suspected leaks.
With many potential sources of PFAS in tap water across the US, the best information we currently have about which cities have PFAS in their water is this ewg map, which you can check to see if Redding has been evaluated for yet.
Our stance is better safe than sorry, and that it makes sense to try to purify the tap water just in case.
What do these Violations Mean?
Safe Drinking Water Act Violations categories split into two groups, health based, and non-health based. Generally, health based violations are more serious, though non-health based violations can also be cause for concern.
Health Based Violations
- Maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) - maximum allowed contaminant level was exceeded.
- Maximum residual disinfectant levels (MRDLs) - maximum allowed disinfectant level was exceeded.
- Other violations (Other) - the exact required process to reduce the amounts of contaminants in drinking water was not followed.
Non-Health Based Violations
- Monitoring and reporting violations (MR, MON) - failure to conduct the required regular monitoring of drinking water quality, and/or to submit monitoring results on time.
- Public notice violations (Other) - failure to immediately alert consumers if there is a serious problem with their drinking water that may pose a risk to public health.
- Other violations (Other) - miscellaneous violations, such as failure to issue annual consumer confidence reports or maintain required records.
SDWA Table Key
Field | Description |
---|---|
Compliance Period | Dates of the compliance period. |
Status |
Current status of the violation.
|
Health-Based? | Whether the violation is health based. |
Category Code |
The category of violation that is reported.
|
Code | A full description of violation codes can be accessed in the SDWA_REF_CODE_VALUES (CSV) table. |
Contaminant Code | A code value that represents a contaminant for which a public water system has incurred a violation of a primary drinking water regulation. |
Rule Code |
Code for a National Drinking Water rule.
|
Rule Group Code |
Code that uniquely identifies a rule group.
|
Rule Family Code |
Code for rule family.
|
For more clarification please visit the EPA's data dictionary.
Redding Water - Frequently Asked Questions
By Phone: | 530-224-6040 |
By Email: | jwatkins@cityofredding.org |
By Mail: | 777 Cypress Ave. REDDING, CA, 96001 |
Existing customers can login to their City of Redding account to pay their Redding water bill by clicking here.
If you want to pay your City of Redding bill online and haven't made an account yet, you can create an account online. Please click here to create your account to pay your Redding water bill.
If you don't want to make an account, or can't remember your account, you can make a one-time payment towards your Redding water bill without creating an account using a one time payment portal with your account number and credit or debit card. Click here to make a one time payment.
Moving to a new house or apartment in Redding means you will often need to put the water in your name with City of Redding. In order to put the water in your name, please click the link to the start service form below. Start service requests for water bills typically take two business days.
Leaving your house or apartment in Redding means you will likely need to take your name off of the water bill with City of Redding. In order to take your name off the water bill, please click the link to the stop service form below. Stop service for water bills requests typically take two business days.
The estimated price of bottled water
$1.68 in USD (1.5-liter)
USER SUBMITTED RATINGS
- Drinking Water Pollution and Inaccessibility
- Water Pollution
- Drinking Water Quality and Accessibility
- Water Quality
The above data is comprised of subjective, user submitted opinions about the water quality and pollution in Redding, measured on a scale from 0% (lowest) to 100% (highest).
Related FAQS
Redding Water Quality Report (Consumer Confidence Report)
The EPA mandates that towns and cities consistently monitor and test their tap water. They must report their findings in an annual Consumer Confidence Report. Below is the most recent water quality report from Redding's Water. If you would like to see the original version of the report, please click here.
2020 Water Quality Report
PWS ID# 4 510005
The City of Redding provides exceptional water to you!
The City of Redding’s Public Works Department is pleased to present to you the 2020 Consumer Confidence Report (CCR). The report is designed to provide our water customers with summary information on the water quality of the City’s water supply sources, the levels of any detected contaminants, and compliance with drinking water regulations. The CCR is prepared and distributed to the City’s water customers each year, in accordance with State and Federal regulations for electronic delivery. The information contained in this report was taken from water analysis performed through December 2020. We test the drinking water quality for many constituents as required by State and Federal Regulations to ensure that the water supplied to our customers consistently meets both Federal and State Water Quality Standards. Last year your tap water met all U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and State drinking water health standards. However, five of the ten Enterprise groundwater wells, which are operated approximately six months out of the year, did exceed the maximum contaminant level for manganese, which is a secondary drinking water standard. Secondary standards are established for contaminants that do not cause adverse health effects, but do diminish the esthetic quality of the water.
We would like all our customers to have current and factual information about our drinking water. To that end, water customers who receive this report are asked to share this information with any tenant or water user on the premise. The CCR can be accessed from the Water Utility web page at http://www.cityofredding.org/CCR, or if you wish to have a copy mailed to you please contact the Water Utility at (530)
We welcome public participation in water quality issues. Information that deals with decisions about our water system is addressed during Redding City Council meetings. These meetings are held the first and third Tuesday of each month at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers at City Hall. The address is 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding. Council information can be accessed on the web page at
We are available to answer questions and provide information if needed. Please see the contact information below.
HOW TO CONTACT US:
Utility Customer Service & Billing: |
Water Conservation Materials: |
General Information: |
||
(530) |
(530) |
(530) |
||
Leak Reports: |
Water Quality Concerns: |
Water Quality Information: |
||
(530) |
(530) |
(530) |
Este informe contiene información muy importante sobre su agua potable. Tradúzcalo ó hable con alguien que lo entienda bien
2020 SAMPLING RESULTS
Sampling results showing TREATMENT OF SURFACE WATER SOURCES
Treatment Technique |
Conventional treatment (coagulation, sedimentation, and filtration) and direct filtration (coagulation and |
||
(Type of approved filtration technology used): |
filtration) in combination with chlorination |
||
Turbidity Performance Standards |
(A) Shall be less than or equal to 0.1 NTU in at least 95 percent of the measurements taken each month; |
||
(that must be met through the water treatment process) |
(B) |
Shall not exceed 1 NTU for more than one continuous hour; |
|
|
(C) |
Shall not exceed 1 NTU at |
|
|
(D) Shall not exceed 1.0 NTU for more than eight consecutive hours. |
||
Lowest monthly percentage of |
Foothill WTP: |
99.3% were less than or equal to 0.1 NTU |
|
Performance Standard No. 1. |
Buckeye WTP: |
96.3% were less than or equal to 0.1 NTU |
|
Highest single instantaneous turbidity measurement during the year. |
0.08 NTU (Range N/A) for Foothill Water Treatment Plant |
||
|
0.11 NTU (Range N/A) for Buckeye Water Treatment Plant |
||
Number of violations of any surface water treatment requirements. |
None |
|
Note: Turbidity (measured in NTU) is a measurement of the cloudiness of water. Monitoring turbidity is a good indicator of water quality and to verify compliance and effectiveness of our water filtration systems and disinfectants.
Sampling results showing the detection of coliform bacteria 2020
Microbiological Contaminants |
Highest No. of Detections |
No. of Months in Violation |
MCL |
MCLG |
Typical Source of Bacteria |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Coliform Bacteria |
0 |
0 |
Greater than 5% of monthly samples |
0 |
Naturally present in the |
|
(Total Coliform Rule) |
positive. |
environment |
||||
|
|
|
||||
Fecal Coliform or E. coli |
0 |
|
A routine sample and a repeat sample |
|
|
|
0 |
detect total coliform and either sample |
0 |
Human and animal fecal waste |
|||
(Total Coliform Rule) |
(In the year) |
|||||
|
also detects fecal coliform or E. coli |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
||
Fecal Indicators |
0 |
|
Treatment Technique (TT) for |
|
|
|
(E. coli, enterococci or coliphage) |
0 |
N/A |
Human and animal fecal waste |
|||
(In a month) |
untreated groundwater |
|||||
(Federal Groundwater Rule) |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
Note: The City of Redding analyzes a minimum of 23 water samples per week throughout the year in the water distribution system for coliform bacteria. A total of 1,267 weekly coliform bacteria monitoring samples were taken during calendar year 2020.
Sampling results showing the detection of Lead and copper (next sampling date Summer 2022)
Lead and Copper |
No. of Samples |
90th Percentile |
No. Sites |
AL |
PHG |
|
Typical Source of Contaminant |
||||||||
Collected |
Level Detected |
Exceeding AL |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Lead (ppb) |
|
30 |
|
|
ND |
0 |
15 |
|
< 2 |
|
Internal corrosion of household water plumbing systems; discharges from |
||||
(August 2019) |
|
|
|
|
|
industrial manufacturers; erosion of natural deposits |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Copper (ppm) |
|
30 |
|
|
0.37 |
|
0 |
1.3 |
|
3 |
|
Internal corrosion of househ old plumbing systems; erosion of natural |
|||
(August 2019) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
deposits; leaching from wood preservatives |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Sampling results for sodium, hardness, and General Chemistry / 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Contaminant |
|
Sample Dates |
|
Average Level Detected |
Range of |
|
MCL |
PHG |
DLR |
Typical Source of Contaminant |
|||||
(CCR reporting units) |
|
|
Detections |
|
(MCLG) |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Sodium (ppm) |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
10.9 |
|
|
N/A |
N/A |
1.0 |
Generally found in ground & surface water |
|||
(Cascade 8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hardness |
|
|
|
78.2 |
|
39 - 101 |
|
|
N/A |
N/A |
5.0 |
Generally found in ground & surface water |
|||
(ppm as CaCO3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Calcium (ppm) |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
5.1 - 24.2 |
|
|
N/A |
N/A |
1.0 |
Naturally occurring dissolved mineral |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Magnesium (ppm) |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
4.6 - 14.6 |
|
|
N/A |
N/A |
1.0 |
Naturally occurring dissolved mineral |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
pH |
|
|
|
7.56 |
|
6.98 - 8.01 |
|
N/A |
N/A |
- |
pH 6.5 to 8.5 is typical for drinking water |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alkalinity |
|
|
|
68.1 |
|
34 - 216 |
|
|
N/A |
N/A |
- |
Measures the buffering capacity of the water |
|||
(ppm as CaCO3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TERMS USED IN THIS REPORT
To help you better understand these terms, the following definitions are provided:
Microbial Contaminants, such as viruses and bacteria, that may come from sewage treatment plants, septic systems, agricultural livestock operations, and wildlife;
Inorganic Contaminants, such as salts and metals, that can be naturally occurring or can result from urban stormwater runoff, industrial or domestic wastewater discharges, oil and gas production, mining, or farming;
Pesticides and Herbicides, that may come from a variety of sources such as agriculture, urban stormwater runoff, and residential uses;
Organic Chemical Contaminants, including synthetic and volatile organic chemicals, which are
Radioactive Contaminants, that can be naturally occurring or can be the result of oil and gas production and mining activities.
More information about contaminants and potential health effects can be obtained by calling the U.S. EPA’s Safe Drinking Water Hotline at (800)
AL (Regulatory Action Level):
The concentration of a contaminant which, if exceeded, triggers treatment or other requirements that a water system must follow.
DLR (Detection Limit Reporting)
The detection level for reporting is set by Fed or State regulation for each reportable analyte
MCL (Maximum Contaminant Level):
The highest level of a contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. Primary MCLs are set as close to the PHGs (or MCLGs) as is economically and technologically feasible.
Secondary MCLs (SMCLs) are set to protect the odor, taste and appearance of drinking water.
MCLG (Maximum Contaminant Level Goal): The level of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MCLGs are set by the U.S. EPA.
MRL (Minimum reporting limit)
MRDL (Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level): The highest level of a disinfectant allowed in drinking water. There is convincing evidence that addition of a disinfectant is necessary for control of microbial contaminants.
MRDLG (Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level Goal): The level of a drinking water disinfectant below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MRDLGs do not reflect the benefits of the use of disinfectants to control microbial contaminants.
NA: (Not applicable)
ND (Not detected): Indicates that the substance was not found by laboratory analysis.
NS: (No standard)
NTU (Nephelometric Turbidity Units): Measurement of the clarity, or turbidity, of water. Turbidity in excess of 5 NTU is just noticeable to the average person.
pCi/L (picocuries per liter): A measure of radioactivity.
PDWS (Primary Drinking Water Standard): MCLs and MRDLs for contaminants that affect health along with their monitoring and reporting requirements, and water treatment requirements.
PHG (Public Health Goal): The level of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. PHGs are set by the California EPA.
ppb (parts per billion): One part substance per billion parts water (or micrograms per liter).
ppm (parts per million): One part substance per million parts water (or milligrams per liter).
ppt (parts per trillion): One part substance per trillion parts water (or nanograms per liter).
ppq (parts per quadrillion) one part substance per quadrillion parts water (or picograms per liter). SWRCB (State Water Resources Control Board)
-
(Treatment Technique): A required process intended to reduce the level of a contaminant in drinking water uS/cm (microsiemens per centimeter): A unit expressing the amount of electrical conductivity of a solution
Units Equivalence
mg/L – milligrams per liter ppm – parts per million 1 second in 11.5 days
µg/L – micrograms per liter ppb – parts per billion 1 second in nearly 32 years ng/L – nanograms per liter ppt – parts per trillion 1 second in nearly 32,000 years
pg/L – picograms per liter ppq – parts per quadrillion 1 second in nearly 32,000,000 years
Detection of contaminants with a Primary Drinking Water Standard |
|
|
|
|
||||
Contaminant |
Sample |
Average |
Range of |
MCL |
PHG |
|
|
|
Level |
(MCLG) |
DLR |
Typical Source of Contaminant |
|||||
(CCR reporting units) |
Date |
Detections |
[MRDL] |
|||||
Detected |
[MRDLG] |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Chlorine |
0.91 |
0.02 - 1.22 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
- |
Disinfectant required by regulation to be added to drinking water. |
||
(Distribution system) (ppm) |
||||||||
Aluminum (ppb) |
61.7 |
52.4 - 71 |
1000 |
600 |
50 |
Erosion of natural deposits; residual from some water treatment process |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arsenic (ppb) |
3.2 |
3.2 |
10 |
0.004 |
2.0 |
Erosion of natural deposits; runoff from orchards; glass and electronics production wastes. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discharges of oil drilling wastes and from metal refineries; erosion of natural |
|
Barium (ppb) |
25.3 |
0 - 101 |
1000 |
2 |
100 |
deposits. Some people who drink water containing barium in excess of the MCL |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
over many years may experience an increase in blood pressure. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Runoff and leaching from fertilizer use; leaching from septic tanks and sewage; erosion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of natural deposits. Infants below the age of six months who drink water containing |
|
Nitrate (ppm as NO3) |
0.63 |
0 - 1.51 |
10 |
45 |
2 |
nitrate in excess of the MCL may quickly become seriously ill and, if untreated, may die |
||
(Wells and Surface Water) |
because high nitrate levels can interfere with the capacity of the infant’s blood to carry |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
oxygen. Symptoms include shortness of breath and blueness of the skin. High nitrate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
levels may affect the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Trihalomethanes |
Quarterly |
31.5 |
0 - 51.0 |
80 |
N/A |
- |
||
(Distribution system) (ppb) |
2020 |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Total of Five Haloacetic |
Quarterly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acids – HAA5 (Distribution |
30.6 |
0 - 49.0 |
60 |
N/A |
- |
|||
2020 |
||||||||
system) (ppb) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Organic Carbon |
Quarterly |
0.93 |
0.7 - 1.2 |
N/A |
N/A |
0.3 |
Various natural and manmade sources. |
|
(TOC) 2 (ppm) |
2020 |
|||||||
VOC Chloromethane (ppb) |
0.82 |
0.82 |
N/A |
N/A |
0.05 |
Man made products used in industry, agriculture, and household products |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Radium 228 (pCi/L) |
0.212 |
0.228 |
5 |
0.05 |
1 |
Erosion of natural deposits. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asbestos (MFL) |
N/D |
N/A |
7 |
7 |
- |
Internal corrosion of asbestos cement water mains; erosion of natural deposits. |
||
(Distribution system) |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Fluoride |
0.14 |
0 - 0.16 |
2.0 |
1 |
- |
Erosion of natural deposits; water additive that promotes strong teeth; discharge |
||
from fertilizer and aluminum factories. |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Only Enterprise Well No.12 has had detections above the arsenic standard in previous years. This well is in the Enterprise pressure zone and is operated on a limited basis during the summer to meet peak water demand. The arsenic MCL was reduced from 50 ppb to 10 ppb on January 23, 2006, by the USEPA.
2 Total Organic Carbon is a precursor for disinfection byproduct formation. The Treatment Technique requirement applies to water filtered from the Buckeye Water Treatment Plant and Foothill Water Treatment Plant.
Detection of contaminants with a Secondary Drinking Water Standard |
|
|
|
|
|||
Contaminant |
Sample Date |
Average Level |
Range of |
SMCL |
PHG |
DLR |
Typical Source of Contaminant |
(CCR reporting units) |
Detected |
Detections |
|
(MCLG) |
|||
|
|
|
|
||||
Manganese (ppb) |
42.6 |
0 - 120 |
50 |
N/A |
20 |
Leaching from natural deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sulfate (ppm) |
5.2 |
5.2 |
500 |
N/A |
0.50 |
Runoff/leaching from natural deposits; industrial waste |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chloride (ppm) |
6.5 |
6.5 |
500 |
N/A |
1 |
Runoff/leaching from natural deposits; seawater influence |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Dissolved Solids (ppm) |
117.8 |
54 - 209 |
1000 |
N/A |
6 |
Runoff/leaching from natural deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specific Conductance (uS/cm) |
255.5 |
91 - 375 |
1600 |
1600 |
- |
Substances that form ions when in water; seawater influence |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron (ppb) |
17.7 |
0 - 101 |
300 |
N/A |
100 |
Leaching from natural deposits; industrial wastes |
Several wells in the Enterprise pressure zone have elevated levels of manganese and iron. Polyphosphate is added to sequester these minerals and the water is blended with water from other Enterprise wells to reduce the iron and manganese below the required MCL, and minimize brown water complaints. Water distribution crews have started unidirectional flushing in the Enterprise pressure zone to help minimize these complaints also.
Sampling results for US EPA UNREGULATED MONITORING RULE (UCMR 4) (SWRCB DDW PFOA/PFOS)
All Public Water Systems (PWS’s) serving 10,000 or more service connections, are required by the USEPA to participate in this program. This data serves as a primary source of occurrence and exposure information that the USEPA uses to develop regulatory decisions. Large PWS’s pay for their own testing costs. UCMR 4 20 unregulated contaminants were analyzed beginning Dec 2018 ending Dec 2019. City of Redding monitored for 10 cynatoxins 4 consecutive months beginning July 2019 to Oct 2019 all coming back
Contaminant |
Sample Dates |
Average Level |
Range of |
MRL |
MCL |
PHG |
|
|
Typical Source of Contaminant |
|
(CCR reporting units) |
Detected |
Detections |
(MCLG) |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
UCMR4 |
|
|||
Manganese (ppb) |
35.95 |
0.67 - 110 |
0.4 |
50 |
N/A |
|
|
Leaching from natural deposits |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HAA9 (ppb) |
31.84 |
0.28 - 54 |
N/A |
60 |
N/A |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PFOS/PFOA(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contaminant |
Sample Date |
Average Level |
Range of |
MRL |
MCL |
RL |
PHG/ |
Typical Source of Contaminant |
||
(CCR reporting units) |
Detected |
Detections |
AL |
|
||||||
PFOS (ppt) |
4.55 |
3.5 - 5.9 |
N/A |
N/A |
6.5 |
40 |
|
Man made Used in consumer products, fire retarding foam and other industrial processes |
||
PFOA (ppt) |
ND |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
5.1 |
10 |
|
Man made Used in consumer products, fire retarding foam and other industrial processes |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PFOS |
3.80 |
3.1 to 4.8 |
N/A |
N/A |
6.5 |
40 |
|
Man made Used in consumer products, fire retarding foam and other industrial processes |
||
(PPT) |
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PFOA (PPT) |
ND |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
5.1 |
10 |
|
Man made Used in consumer products, fire retarding foam and other industrial processes |
(1) Note PFOS/PFOA will be sampled at 4 Enterprise wells around Redding Muni Airport thru Sept 2021 and possibly beyond with UCMR 5 EPA mandated sampling program
A Message from the Water Utility Manager
Your health and the health of the Redding community are important to us. We are proud of the fact that your water utility not only meets stringent Federal and State Water Quality standards each and every day of the year, but in most cases, contaminant levels fall far below published Primary and Secondary Standards. This means that you, the customer, are assured of the safest water we can deliver to your home or business.
As a division of the City of Redding’s Public Works Department, the Water Utility’s mission is to provide our customers with reliable supply of
in capital facilities such as distribution pipelines, reservoirs, pump stations, water treatment plants and groundwater wells are necessary to maintain the current level of service to our customers.
Towards that end, 27 full time employees: 10 Treatment Operators and 17 Distribution Operators maintain approximately 565 miles of water mains, 30,000 metered service connections, and one 24 MGD surface water treatment plant, one 14 MGD surface water treatment plant, 16 groundwater wells, 1 raw water pump station, 9 booster pump stations, 11 reservoirs totaling 32.7 million gallons of storage, four supervisory valve stations, 14 pressure reducing stations, seven pressure zones and serve approximately 88,000 people within a service area of approximately 60 square miles.
If you have any questions or need additional information on the City of Redding’s Water System please contact Josh Watkins, Water Utility Manager at (530)
Source Water Assessment
The City of Redding conducted source water assessments for its surface water in July 2018 and groundwater sources in May 2002. The source water assessment identifies possible activities in the vicinity of each source that could affect the water quality of that source. The Redding Area Watershed Sanitary Survey was completed in January 2021. For more information on the source water assessment or sanitary survey, please contact the Water Utility at (530)
The sources of drinking water (both tap water and bottled water) include rivers, lakes, streams, ponds, reservoirs, springs, and wells. As water travels over the surface of the land or through the ground, it dissolves
Contaminants that may be present in source water include:
- Microbial contaminants, such as viruses and bacteria, which may come from wastewater treatment plants, septic systems, agricultural livestock operations, and wildlife.
-
Inorganic contaminants, such as salts and metals, which can be
naturally-occurring or result from urban stormwater runoff, industrial or domestic wastewater discharges, oil and gas production, mining, or farming. - Pesticides and herbicides, which may come from a variety of sources such as agriculture, urban stormwater runoff, and residential uses.
- Organic chemical contaminants, including synthetic and volatile organic chemicals, which are byproducts of industrial processes and petroleum production, and can also come from gas stations, urban stormwater runoff, and septic systems.
-
Radioactive contaminants, which can be
naturally-occurring or be the result of oil and gas production and mining activities. -
Arsenic, While your drinking water meets the federal and state standard for arsenic, it does contain low levels of arsenic.
The arsenic standard balances the current understanding of arsenic’s possible health effects against the costs of removing arsenic from drinking water. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) continues to research the health effects of low levels of arsenic, which is a mineral known to cause cancer in humans at high concentrations and is linked to other health effects such as skin damage and circulatory problems. - Nitrate, in drinking water at levels above 10 mg/L is a health risk
for infants of less than six months of age. Such nitrate levels in drinking water can interfere with the capacity of the infant’s blood to carry oxygen, resulting in a serious illness; symptoms include shortness of breath and blueness of the skin. Nitrate levels above 10 mg/L may also affect the ability of the blood to carry oxygen in other individuals, such as pregnant women and those with certain specific enzyme deficiencies. If you are caring for an infant, or you are pregnant, you should ask advice from your health care provider. Nitrate levels may rise quickly for short periods of time because of rainfall or agricultural activity.
In order to ensure that tap water is safe to drink, EPA prescribes regulations which limit the amount of certain contaminants in water provided by public water systems. Food and Drug Administration regulations establish limits for contaminants in bottled water which must provide the same protection for public health.
Water Quality Standards and Testing Results
To ensure that tap water is safe to drink, the USEPA and the SWRCB prescribe regulations that limit the amount of certain contaminants in water provided by public water systems. SWRCB regulations also establish limits for contaminants in bottled water that must provide the same protection for public health.
The City’s water supplies must meet stringent water quality standards that are set forth by the USEPA and the SWRCB. The tables on the following pages list all of the drinking water contaminants that were detected during sampling over the past several years. The presence of these contaminants in the water does not necessarily indicate that the water poses a health risk. SWRCB allows monitoring for certain contaminants less than once per year because the concentrations of these contaminants do not change frequently. Some of the data, though representative of the water quality, are more than one year old.
Additional General Information on Drinking Water Drinking water, including bottled water, may reasonably be expected to contain at least small amounts of some contaminants. The presence of contaminants does not necessarily indicate that the water poses a health risk. More information about contaminants and potential health effects can be obtained by calling the USEPA’s Safe Drinking Water Hotline
Some people may be more vulnerable to contaminants in drinking water than the general population.
be particularly at risk from infections. These people should seek advice about drinking water from their health care providers. USEPA/Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines on appropriate means to lessen the risk of infection by Cryptosporidium and other microbial contaminants are available from the USEPA website.
Infants, young children, and pregnant women are typically more vulnerable to lead in drinking water than the general population. It is possible that lead levels at your home may be higher than at other homes in the community as a result of the materials used in your home’s plumbing. If your water faucet has not been used for several hours, you can minimize the potential for lead exposure by flushing the faucet for 30 seconds to 2 minutes before using water for drinking or cooking. If you are concerned about elevated lead levels in your home’s water, you may wish to have your water tested. Additional information is available from the USEPA Safe Drinking Water Hotline
Public Water Systems in 2019 (PWSs) were required to monitor for 10 cynatoxins at entry points to the distribution system 4 consecutive months. City took these samples July thru October 2019, all samples came back absent of any trace of cynatoxins. In addition we monitor 20 additional chemical contaminants from December 2018 to October 2019 as part of UCMR 4 sampling mandate from EPA. Samples were collected from finished water at both of our surface water treatment plants and groundwater well system sites representing the entire water system.
SWRCB Division of Drinking Water (DDW) required more testing of Perfluorooctanoic Acid [PFOA] & Perfluorooctanesulfonic Acid [PFOS] for 8 consecutive quarters. The City of Redding began testing in September 2019. In 2019/2020 no sample came back higher than the notification levels (NL) of 6.5 ppt for PFOS or 5.1 ppt of PFOA. Six (6) wells were tested in 2019, four (4) wells were tested in 2020 in the area of the Redding Municipal Airport (see results in tables). The USEPA has not established maximum contaminant levels (MCL) for these unregulated contaminants, and the human health effects of these contaminants at the levels they were found is unclear. In the absence of MCLs and health standards, published guidance or health reference levels are available from the USEPA’s Safe Drinking Water Hotline
Water Supply Sources
Water sources include surface water from the Sacramento River and Whiskeytown Reservoir which made up 76% of the treated water supply, or approximately 6.46 billion gallons or 19,812
8.48 billion gallons, 26,026
Groundwater Quality
Five of the wells in the Enterprise zone have elevated levels of iron and manganese, which may appear as dark mineral deposits.
Contaminants
City of Redding
EWG's drinking water quality report shows results of tests conducted by the water utility and provided to the Environmental Working Group by the California State Water Resources Control Board, as well as information from the U.S. EPA Enforcement and Compliance History database (ECHO). For the latest quarter assessed by the U.S. EPA (January 2019 - March 2019), tap water provided by this water utility was in compliance with federal health-based drinking water standards.
Utility details
- Serves: 91207
- Data available: 2012-2017
- Data Source: Surface water
- Total: 20
Contaminants That Exceed Guidelines
- Arsenic
- Bromodichloromethane
- Chloroform
- Chromium (hexavalent)
- Dichloroacetic acid
- Nitrate
- Radium%2C combined (-226 & -228)
- Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)
- Trichloroacetic acid
Other Detected Contaminants
- Barium
- Bromoform
- Chlorate
- Dibromoacetic acid
- Dibromochloromethane
- Fluoride
- Haloacetic acids (HAA5)
- Manganese
- Molybdenum
- Strontium
- Vanadium
Reminder
Always take extra precautions, the water may be safe to drink when it leaves the sewage treatment plant but it may pick up pollutants during its way to your tap. We advise that you ask locals or hotel staff about the water quality. Also, note that different cities have different water mineral contents.
Sources and Resources
Sources Cited
Additional Resources
The story of Tap Water Redding United States is a tale of two countries. It''s a tale of two ways of looking at water and its resources - that is, how those resources are actually used today.
Tap Water Redding, for those not in the know, is an account of a small American town. It was located in the southwest corner of Wyoming, just across the border of the Grand Teton National Park. Water has always been abundant here. There was plenty of it available. The problem, of course, was the quality of the water.
The people of Watertown, Wyoming, were so pleased with the water they had, that they were willing to go to great lengths to keep it clean. They were willing to go so far as to make a claim on the water that was left over in the tank.
And yet, this left them with a serious problem: there wasn''t enough water in the tank. They kept filling the tank, but the problem was never solved. They were constantly worried that the water would run out