Table of Contents
Can You Drink Tap Water in Gastonia?
Yes, Gastonia's tap water is generally considered safe to drink as Gastonia has no active health based violations of the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) that we are aware of. Other factors such as lead piping in a home, or low levels of pollutants on immunocompromised individuals, should also be considered, however. To find more recent info we might have, you can check out our boil water notice page or the city's water provider website.
According the EPA’s ECHO database, from April 30, 2019 to June 30, 2022, Gastonia's water utility, Two Rivers Utilities, had 0 violations of the Safe Drinking Water Act. For more details on the violations, please see our violation history section below. This assessment is based on the Two Rivers Utilities water system, other water systems in the city may have different results.
While tap water that meets the EPA health guidelines generally won’t make you sick to your stomach, it can still contain regulated and unregulated contaminants present in trace amounts that could potentially cause health issues over the long-run. These trace contaminants may also impact immunocompromised and vulnerable individuals.
The EPA is reviewing if it’s current regulations around pollutant levels in tap water are strict enough, and the health dangers posed by unregulated pollutants, like PFAS.
Water Quality Report for Gastonia Tap Water
The most recent publicly available numbers for measured contaminant levels in Gastonia tap water are in its 2020 Water Quality Report. As you can see, there are levels which the EPA considers to be acceptable, but being below the maximum allowable level doesn’t necessarily mean the water is healthy.
Lead in tap water, for example, is currently allowed at up to 15ppb by the EPA, but it has set the ideal goal for lead at zero. This highlights how meeting EPA standards doesn’t necessarily mean local tap water is healthy.
EPA regulations continue to change as it evaluates the long term impacts of chemicals and updates drinking water acceptable levels. The rules around arsenic, as well as, lead and copper are currently being re-evaluated.
There are also a number of "emerging" contaminants that are not currently. For example, PFAS (Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), for which the EPA has issued a health advisory. PFAS are called "forever chemicals" since they tend not to break down in the environment or the human body and can accumulate over time.
We recommend looking at the contaminants present in Gastonia's water quality reports, or getting your home's tap water tested to see if you should be filtering your water.
Gastonia Tap Water Safe Drinking Water Act Violation History - Prior 10 Years
Below is a ten year history of violations for the water system named Two Rivers Utilities for Gastonia in North Carolina. For more details please see the "What do these Violations Mean?" section below.
For the compliance period beginning July 1, 2013, Gastonia had 1 non-health based Safe Drinking Water Act violation with the violation category being Other Violation, more specifically, the violation code was Consumer Confidence Report Complete Failure to Report which falls into the Other rule code group, and the Consumer Confidence Rule rule code family for the following contaminant code: Consumer Confidence Rule.
Is there Lead in Gastonia Water?
Based on the EPA’s ECHO Database, 90% of the samples taken from the Gastonia water system, Two Rivers Utilities, between sample start date and sample end date, were at or below, 0.0 mg/L of lead in Gastonia water. This is 0% of the 0.015 mg/L action level. This means 10% of the samples taken from Gastonia contained more lead.
While Gastonia water testing may have found 0.0 mg/L of lead in its water, that does not mean your water source has the same amount. The amount of lead in water in a city can vary greatly from neighborhood to neighborhood, or even building to building. Many buildings, particularly older ones, have lead pipes or service lines which can be a source of contamination. To find out if your home has lead, we recommend getting you water tested.
No amount of lead in water is healthy, only less dangerous. As lead accumulates in our bodies over time, even exposure to relatively small amounts can have negative health effects. For more information, please check out our Lead FAQ page.
Are there PFAS in Gastonia Tap Water?
Currently, testing tap water for PFAS isn’t mandated on a national level. We do have a list of military bases where there have been suspected or confirmed leaks. There appears to be at least one military base - Charlotte Douglas International Airport - near Gastonia with suspected leaks.
With many potential sources of PFAS in tap water across the US, the best information we currently have about which cities have PFAS in their water is this ewg map, which you can check to see if Gastonia has been evaluated for yet.
Our stance is better safe than sorry, and that it makes sense to try to purify the tap water just in case.
Gastonia SDWA Violation History Table - Prior 10 Years
Compliance Period | Status | Health-Based? | Category Code | Code | Rule Code | Contaminant Code | Rule Group Code | Rule Family Code |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
07/01/2013 - | Resolved | No | Other Violation (Other) | Consumer Confidence Report Complete Failure to Report (71) | Consumer Confidence Rule (420) | Consumer Confidence Rule (7000) | Other (400) | Consumer Confidence Rule (420) |
What do these Violations Mean?
Safe Drinking Water Act Violations categories split into two groups, health based, and non-health based. Generally, health based violations are more serious, though non-health based violations can also be cause for concern.
Health Based Violations
- Maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) - maximum allowed contaminant level was exceeded.
- Maximum residual disinfectant levels (MRDLs) - maximum allowed disinfectant level was exceeded.
- Other violations (Other) - the exact required process to reduce the amounts of contaminants in drinking water was not followed.
Non-Health Based Violations
- Monitoring and reporting violations (MR, MON) - failure to conduct the required regular monitoring of drinking water quality, and/or to submit monitoring results on time.
- Public notice violations (Other) - failure to immediately alert consumers if there is a serious problem with their drinking water that may pose a risk to public health.
- Other violations (Other) - miscellaneous violations, such as failure to issue annual consumer confidence reports or maintain required records.
SDWA Table Key
Field | Description |
---|---|
Compliance Period | Dates of the compliance period. |
Status |
Current status of the violation.
|
Health-Based? | Whether the violation is health based. |
Category Code |
The category of violation that is reported.
|
Code | A full description of violation codes can be accessed in the SDWA_REF_CODE_VALUES (CSV) table. |
Contaminant Code | A code value that represents a contaminant for which a public water system has incurred a violation of a primary drinking water regulation. |
Rule Code |
Code for a National Drinking Water rule.
|
Rule Group Code |
Code that uniquely identifies a rule group.
|
Rule Family Code |
Code for rule family.
|
For more clarification please visit the EPA's data dictionary.
Gastonia Water - Frequently Asked Questions
By Mail: | PO BOX 1748 GASTONIA, NC, 28053 |
Existing customers can login to their Two Rivers Utilities account to pay their Gastonia water bill by clicking here.
If you want to pay your Two Rivers Utilities bill online and haven't made an account yet, you can create an account online. Please click here to create your account to pay your Gastonia water bill.
If you don't want to make an account, or can't remember your account, you can make a one-time payment towards your Gastonia water bill without creating an account using a one time payment portal with your account number and credit or debit card. Click here to make a one time payment.
Moving to a new house or apartment in Gastonia means you will often need to put the water in your name with Two Rivers Utilities. In order to put the water in your name, please click the link to the start service form below. Start service requests for water bills typically take two business days.
Leaving your house or apartment in Gastonia means you will likely need to take your name off of the water bill with Two Rivers Utilities. In order to take your name off the water bill, please click the link to the stop service form below. Stop service for water bills requests typically take two business days.
The estimated price of bottled water
$1 in USD (1.5-liter)
USER SUBMITTED RATINGS
- Drinking Water Pollution and Inaccessibility
- Water Pollution
- Drinking Water Quality and Accessibility
- Water Quality
The above data is comprised of subjective, user submitted opinions about the water quality and pollution in Gastonia, measured on a scale from 0% (lowest) to 100% (highest).
Related FAQS
Gastonia Water Quality Report (Consumer Confidence Report)
The EPA mandates that towns and cities consistently monitor and test their tap water. They must report their findings in an annual Consumer Confidence Report. Below is the most recent water quality report from Gastonia's Water. If you would like to see the original version of the report, please click here.
2020
Annual Drinking Water Quality Report
Two Rivers Utilities
Water System Number: NC 01-36-010
Este informe contiene información muy importante sobre su agua potable. Tradúzcalo o hable con alguien que lo entienda bien.
We are pleased to present to you this year's Annual Drinking Water Quality Report. This report is a snapshot of last year’s water quality. Included are details about your source(s) of water, what it contains, and how it compares to standards set by regulatory agencies. Our constant goal is to provide you with a safe and dependable supply of drinking water. We want you to understand the efforts we make to continually improve the water treatment process and protect our water resources. We are committed to ensuring the quality of your water and to providing you with this information because informed customers are our best allies. If you have any questions about this report or concerning your water, please contact David Rowland at
What EPA Wants You to Know
Drinking water, including bottled water, may reasonably be expected to contain at least small amounts of some contaminants. The presence of contaminants does not necessarily indicate that water poses a health risk. More information about contaminants and potential health effects can be obtained by calling the Environmental Protection Agency's Safe Drinking Water Hotline
Some people may be more vulnerable to contaminants in drinking water than the general population.
If present, elevated levels of lead can cause serious health problems, especially for pregnant women and young children. Lead in drinking water is primarily from materials and components associated with service lines and home plumbing. [Name of Utility] is responsible for providing high quality drinking water, but cannot control the variety of materials used in plumbing components. When your water has been sitting for several hours, you can minimize the potential for lead exposure by flushing your tap for 30 seconds to 2 minutes before using water for drinking or cooking. If you are concerned about lead in your water, you may wish to have your water tested. Information on lead in drinking water, testing methods, and steps you can take to minimize exposure is available from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline or at http://www.epa.gov/safewater/lead.
The sources of drinking water (both tap water and bottled water) include rivers, lakes, streams, ponds, reservoirs, springs, and wells. As water travels over the surface of the land or through the ground, it dissolves
In order to ensure that tap water is safe to drink, EPA prescribes regulations which limit the amount of certain contaminants in water provided by public water systems. FDA regulations establish limits for contaminants in bottled water, which must provide the same protection for public health.
When You Turn on Your Tap, Consider the Source
The water that is used by Two Rivers Utilities is surface water that is drawn from Mountain Island Lake which is an impoundment on the Catawaba River. Mountain Island Lake was created in 1924 and it is located northwest of Charlotte North Carolina. This 3,281 acre lake gets its name from the mountain which appears as an island in the lake.
Source Water Assessment Program (SWAP) Results
The North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), Public Water Supply (PWS) Section, Source Water Assessment Program (SWAP) conducted assessments for all drinking water sources across North Carolina. The purpose of the assessments was to determine the susceptibility of each drinking water source (well or surface water intake) to Potential Contaminant Sources (PCSs). The results of the assessment are available in SWAP Assessment Reports that include maps, background information and a relative susceptibility rating of Higher, Moderate or Lower.
The relative susceptibility rating of each source for Two Rivers Utilities was determined by combining the contaminant rating (number and location of PCSs within the assessment area) and the inherent vulnerability rating (i.e., characteristics or existing conditions of the well or watershed and its delineated assessment area). The assessment findings are summarized in the table below:
Susceptibility of Sources to Potential Contaminant Sources (PCSs)
Source Name: |
Mt. Island Lake |
Susceptibility Rating: |
Moderate September 2020 |
The complete SWAP Assessment report for Two Rivers Utilities may be viewed on the Web at: https://www.ncwater.org/?page=600 Note that because SWAP results and reports are periodically updated by the PWS Section, the results available on this web site may differ from the results that were available at the time this CCR was prepared. If you are unable to access your SWAP report on the web, you may mail a written request for a printed copy to: Source Water Assessment Program – Report Request, 1634 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC
It is important to understand that a susceptibility rating of “higher” does not imply poor water quality, only the system’s potential to become contaminated by PCSs in the assessment area.
Help Protect Your Source Water
Protection of drinking water is everyone’s responsibility. You can help protect your community’s drinking water source(s) in several ways: dispose of chemicals properly, take used motor oil to a recycling center, volunteer in your community to participate in group efforts to protect your source, etc.
Water Quality Data Tables of Detected Contaminants
We routinely monitor for over 150 contaminants in your drinking water according to Federal and State laws. The tables below list all the drinking water contaminants that we detected in the last round of sampling for each particular contaminant group. The presence of contaminants does not necessarily indicate that water poses a health risk. Unless otherwise noted, the data presented in this table is from testing done January 1 through December 31, 2020. The EPA and the State allow us to monitor for certain contaminants less than once per year because the concentrations of these contaminants are not expected to vary significantly from year to year. Some of the data, though representative of the water quality, is more than
Unregulated contaminants are those for which EPA has not established drinking water standards. The purpose of unregulated contaminant monitoring is to assist EPA in determining the occurrence of unregulated contaminants in drinking water and whether future regulations are warranted.
Important Drinking Water Definitions:
Parts per million (ppm) or Milligrams per liter (mg/L) - One part per million corresponds to one minute in two years or a single penny in $10,000.
Parts per billion (ppb) or Micrograms per liter (ug/L) - One part per billion corresponds to one minute in 2,000 years, or a single penny in $10,000,000.
Parts per trillion (ppt) or Nanograms per liter (nanograms/L) - One part per trillion corresponds to one minute in 2,000,000 years, or a single penny in $10,000,000,000.
Parts per quadrillion (ppq) or Picograms per liter (picograms/L) - One part per quadrillion corresponds to one minute in 2,000,000,000 years or one penny in $10,000,000,000,000.
Picocuries per liter (pCi/L) - Picocuries per liter is a measure of the radioactivity in water.
Million Fibers per Liter (MFL) - Million fibers per liter is a measure of the presence of asbestos fibers that are longer than 10 micrometers.
Nephelometric Turbidity Unit (NTU) - Nephelometric turbidity unit is a measure of the clarity of water. Turbidity in excess of 5 NTU is just noticeable to the average person.
Action Level (AL) - The concentration of a contaminant which, if exceeded, triggers treatment or other requirements which a water system must follow.
Treatment Technique (TT) - A required process intended to reduce the level of a contaminant in drinking water.
Maximum Residual Disinfection Level (MRDL) – The highest level of a disinfectant allowed in drinking water. There is convincing evidence that addition of a disinfectant is necessary for control of microbial contaminants.
Maximum Residual Disinfection Level Goal (MRDLG) – The level of a drinking water disinfectant below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MRDLGs do not reflect the benefits of the use of disinfectants to control microbial contaminants.
Locational Running Annual Average (LRAA) – The average of sample analytical results for samples taken at a particular monitoring location during the previous four calendar quarters under the Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule.
Level 1 Assessment - A Level 1 assessment is a study of the water system to identify potential problems and determine (if possible) why total coliform bacteria have been found in our water system.
Level 2 Assessment - A Level 2 assessment is a very detailed study of the water system to identify potential problems and determine (if possible) why an E. coli MCL violation has occurred and/or why total coliform bacteria have been found in our water system on multiple occasions.
Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) - The highest level of a contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. MCLs are set as close to the MCLGs as feasible using the best available treatment technology.
Maximum Contaminant Level Goal (MCLG) - The level of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MCLGs allow for a margin of safety.
Tables of Detected Contaminants
REVISED TOTAL COLIFORM RULE:
Microbiological Contaminants in the Distribution System - For systems that collect 40 or more samples per month
|
MCL |
Your |
|
|
Likely Source of |
|
Contaminant (units) |
Violation |
MCLG |
MCL |
|||
Water |
Contamination |
|||||
|
Y/N |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total Coliform Bacteria |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
TT* |
Naturally present in the |
|
(presence or absence) |
environment |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Routine and repeat samples are total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
positive or system fails to take repeat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
samples following E. |
|
|
E. coli |
|
|
|
routine sample or system fails to analyze |
|
|
(presence or absence) |
No |
0 |
0 |
total |
Human and animal fecal waste |
|
|
|
|
|
for E. coli |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: If either an original routine sample |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and/or its repeat samples(s) are E. coli |
|
|
|
|
|
|
positive, a Tier 1 violation exists. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* If a system collecting 40 or more samples per month finds greater than 5% of monthly samples are positive in one month, an assessment is required.
Turbidity*
|
Treatment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technique |
|
|
|
Likely Source of |
|
Contaminant (units) |
(TT) |
Your Water |
MCLG |
Treatment Technique (TT) |
||
Contamination |
||||||
|
Violation |
|
|
Violation if: |
||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Y/N |
|
|
|
|
|
Turbidity (NTU) - Highest |
No |
0.247 |
N/A |
Turbidity > 1 NTU |
|
|
single turbidity measurement |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Soil runoff |
|
Turbidity (NTU) - Lowest |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Less than 95% of monthly turbidity |
|
||
monthly percentage (%) of |
No |
100% |
N/A |
|
||
measurements are < 0.3 NTU |
|
|||||
samples meeting turbidity limits |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Turbidity is a measure of the cloudiness of the water. We monitor it because it is a good indicator of the effectiveness of our filtration system. The turbidity rule requires that 95% or more of the monthly samples must be less than or equal to 0.3 NTU.
Inorganic Contaminants
|
Sample |
MCL |
Your |
Range |
|
|
|
|
Contaminant (units) |
Violation |
|
|
MCLG |
MCL |
Likely Source of Contamination |
||
Date |
Water |
|
|
|||||
|
Y/N |
Low |
High |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Antimony (ppb) |
1/7/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
6 |
6 |
Discharge from petroleum refineries; fire |
|
retardants; ceramics; electronics; solder |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Erosion of natural deposits; runoff from |
Arsenic (ppb) |
1/7/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
0 |
10 |
orchards; runoff from glass and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
electronics production wastes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discharge of drilling wastes; discharge |
Barium (ppm) |
1/7/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
2 |
2 |
from metal refineries; erosion of natural |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discharge from metal refineries and coal- |
Beryllium (ppb) |
1/7/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
4 |
4 |
burning factories; discharge from |
|
electrical, aerospace, and defense |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
industries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corrosion of galvanized pipes; erosion of |
Cadmium (ppb) |
1/7/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
5 |
5 |
natural deposits; discharge from metal |
|
refineries; runoff from waste batteries and |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
paints |
Chromium (ppb) |
1/7/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
100 |
100 |
Discharge from steel and pulp mills; |
|
erosion of natural deposits |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discharge from steel/metal factories; |
Cyanide (ppb) |
1/7/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
200 |
200 |
discharge from plastic and fertilizer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
factories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Erosion of natural deposits; water additive |
Fluoride (ppm) |
1/7/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
4 |
4 |
which promotes strong teeth; discharge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from fertilizer and aluminum factories |
Mercury (inorganic) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Erosion of natural deposits; discharge |
1/7/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
2 |
2 |
from refineries and factories; runoff from |
|
(ppb) |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
landfills; runoff from cropland |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discharge from petroleum and metal |
Selenium (ppb) |
1/7/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
50 |
50 |
refineries; erosion of natural deposits; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
discharge from mines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leaching from |
Thallium (ppb) |
1/7/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
0.5 |
2 |
discharge from electronics, glass, and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
drug factories |
Arsenic: While your drinking water meets EPA’s standard for arsenic, it does contain low levels of arsenic. EPA’s standard balances the current understanding of arsenic’s possible health effects against the costs of removing arsenic from drinking water. EPA continues to research the health effects of low levels of arsenic, which is a mineral known to cause cancer in humans at high concentrations and is linked to other health effects such as skin damage and circulatory problems.
Nitrate/Nitrite Contaminants
|
Sample |
MCL |
Your |
Range |
|
|
|
|
Contaminant (units) |
Violation |
|
|
MCLG |
MCL |
Likely Source of Contamination |
||
Date |
Water |
|
|
|||||
|
Y/N |
Low |
High |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Nitrate (as Nitrogen) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Runoff from fertilizer use; leaching from |
1/7/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
10 |
10 |
septic tanks, sewage; erosion of natural |
|
(ppm) |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nitrite (as Nitrogen) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Runoff from fertilizer use; leaching from |
1/7/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
1 |
1 |
septic tanks, sewage; erosion of natural |
|
(ppm) |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nitrate: Nitrate in drinking water at levels above 10 ppm is a health risk for infants of less than six months of age. High nitrate levels in drinking water can cause blue baby syndrome. Nitrate levels may rise quickly for short periods of time because of rainfall or agricultural activity. If you are caring for an infant, you should ask advice from your health care provider.
Asbestos Contaminant
|
Sample |
MCL |
Your |
Range |
|
|
|
|
Contaminant (units) |
Violation |
|
|
MCLG |
MCL |
Likely Source of Contamination |
||
Date |
Water |
|
|
|||||
|
Y/N |
Low |
High |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Total Asbestos (MFL) |
1/29/20 |
No |
ND |
|
NA |
7 |
7 |
Decay of asbestos cement water mains; |
|
erosion of natural deposits |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unregulated Inorganic Contaminants
|
Sample |
Your |
Range |
|
Contaminant (units) |
Water |
|
|
|
Date |
|
|
||
|
(average) |
Low |
High |
|
|
|
|||
Sodium |
1/7/20 |
12 mg/L |
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
Synthetic Organic Chemical (SOC) Contaminants Including Pesticides and Herbicides
|
Sample |
MCL |
Your |
Range |
|
|
|
|
Contaminant (units) |
Violation |
|
|
MCLG |
MCL |
Likely Source of Contamination |
||
Date |
Water |
|
|
|||||
|
Y/N |
Low |
High |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
4/23/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
70 |
70 |
Runoff from herbicide used on row crops |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/23/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
50 |
50 |
Residue of banned herbicide |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alachlor (ppb) |
4/23/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
0 |
2 |
Runoff from herbicide used on row crops |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atrazine (ppb) |
4/23/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
3 |
3 |
Runoff from herbicide used on row crops |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benzo(a)pyrene (PAH) |
4/23/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
0 |
200 |
Leaching from linings of water storage |
(ppt) |
|
tanks and distribution lines |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Carbofuran (ppb) |
4/23/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
40 |
40 |
Leaching of soil fumigant used on rice |
|
and alfalfa |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chlordane (ppb) |
4/23/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
0 |
2 |
Residue of banned termiticide |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dalapon (ppb) |
4/23/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
200 |
200 |
Runoff from herbicide used on rights of |
|
way |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/23/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
400 |
400 |
Discharge from chemical factories |
|
adipate (ppb) |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/23/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
0 |
6 |
Discharge from rubber and chemical |
|
phthalate (ppb) |
|
factories |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DBCP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Runoff/leaching from soil fumigant used |
[Dibromochloropropane] |
4/23/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
0 |
200 |
on soybeans, cotton, pineapples, and |
(ppt) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
orchards |
Dinoseb (ppb) |
4/23/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
7 |
7 |
Runoff from herbicide used on soybeans |
|
and vegetables |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Endrin (ppb) |
4/23/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
2 |
2 |
Residue of banned insecticide |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EDB [Ethylene |
4/23/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
0 |
50 |
Discharge from petroleum refineries |
dibromide] (ppt) |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heptachlor (ppt) |
4/23/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
0 |
400 |
Residue of banned pesticide |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heptachlor epoxide (ppt) |
4/23/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
0 |
200 |
Breakdown of heptachlor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hexachlorobenzene (ppb) |
4/23/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
0 |
1 |
Discharge from metal refineries and |
|
agricultural chemical factories |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hexachlorocyclo- |
4/23/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
50 |
50 |
Discharge from chemical factories |
pentadiene (ppb) |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lindane (ppt) |
4/23/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
200 |
200 |
Runoff/leaching from insecticide used on |
|
cattle, lumber, gardens |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Methoxychlor (ppb) |
4/23/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
40 |
40 |
Runoff/leaching from insecticide used on |
|
fruits, vegetables, alfalfa, livestock |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oxamyl [Vydate] (ppb) |
4/23/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
200 |
200 |
Runoff/leaching from insecticide used on |
|
apples, potatoes and tomatoes |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PCBs [Polychlorinated |
4/23/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
0 |
500 |
Runoff from landfills; discharge of waste |
biphenyls] (ppt) |
|
chemicals |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Pentachlorophenol (ppb) |
4/23/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
0 |
1 |
Discharge from wood preserving |
|
factories |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Picloram (ppb) |
4/23/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
500 |
500 |
Herbicide runoff |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Simazine (ppb) |
4/23/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
4 |
4 |
Herbicide runoff |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Toxaphene (ppb) |
4/23/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
0 |
3 |
Runoff/leaching from insecticide used on |
|
cotton and cattle |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volatile Organic Chemical (VOC) Contaminants
|
Sample |
MCL |
Your |
Range |
|
|
|
|
Contaminant (units) |
Violation |
|
|
MCLG |
MCL |
Likely Source of Contamination |
||
Date |
Water |
|
|
|||||
|
Y/N |
Low |
High |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Benzene (ppb) |
1/7/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
0 |
5 |
Discharge from factories; leaching from |
|
gas storage tanks and landfills |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carbon tetrachloride (ppb) |
1/7/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
0 |
5 |
Discharge from chemical plants and other |
|
industrial activities |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chlorobenzene (ppb) |
1/7/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
100 |
100 |
Discharge from chemical and agricultural |
|
chemical factories |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/7/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
600 |
600 |
Discharge from industrial chemical |
|
|
factories |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/7/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
75 |
75 |
Discharge from industrial chemical |
|
|
factories |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,2 – Dichloroethane (ppb) |
1/7/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
0 |
5 |
Discharge from industrial chemical |
|
factories |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,1 – Dichloroethylene (ppb) |
1/7/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
7 |
7 |
Discharge from industrial chemical |
|
factories |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/7/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
70 |
70 |
Discharge from industrial chemical |
|
|
factories |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/7/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
100 |
100 |
Discharge from industrial chemical |
|
(ppb) |
|
factories |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Dichloromethane (ppb) |
1/7/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
0 |
5 |
Discharge from pharmaceutical and |
|
chemical factories |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/7/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
0 |
5 |
Discharge from industrial chemical |
|
|
factories |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ethylbenzene (ppb) |
1/7/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
700 |
700 |
Discharge from petroleum refineries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Styrene (ppb) |
1/7/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
100 |
100 |
Discharge from rubber and plastic |
|
factories; leaching from landfills |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tetrachloroethylene (ppb) |
1/7/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
0 |
5 |
Discharge from factories and dry cleaners |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,2,4 |
1/7/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
70 |
70 |
Discharge from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,1,1 – Trichloroethane (ppb) |
1/7/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
200 |
200 |
Discharge from metal degreasing sites and |
|
other factories |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,1,2 |
1/7/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
3 |
5 |
Discharge from industrial chemical |
|
factories |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trichloroethylene (ppb) |
1/7/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
0 |
5 |
Discharge from metal degreasing sites and |
|
other factories |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Toluene (ppm) |
1/7/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
1 |
1 |
Discharge from petroleum factories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vinyl Chloride (ppb) |
1/7/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
0 |
2 |
Leaching from PVC piping; discharge |
|
from plastics factories |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xylenes (Total) (ppm) |
1/7/20 |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
10 |
10 |
Discharge from petroleum factories; |
|
discharge from chemical factories |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lead and Copper Contaminants
|
Sample |
Your |
Number of |
|
|
|
|
Contaminant (units) |
sites found |
MCLG |
AL |
Likely Source of Contamination |
|||
Date |
Water |
||||||
|
above the AL |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Copper (ppm) |
June |
0.19 |
0 |
1.3 |
AL=1.3 |
Corrosion of household plumbing |
|
(90th percentile) |
2020 |
systems; erosion of natural deposits |
|||||
Lead (ppb) |
June |
<3 |
0 |
0 |
AL=15 |
Corrosion of household plumbing |
|
(90th percentile) |
2020 |
|
systems; erosion of natural deposits |
Radiological Contaminants
|
Sample |
MCL |
Your |
Range |
|
|
|
|
Contaminant (units) |
Violation |
|
MCLG |
MCL |
Likely Source of Contamination |
|||
Date |
Water |
|
||||||
|
Y/N |
Low High |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Alpha emitters (pCi/L) |
1/17/19 |
No |
1 |
N/A |
0 |
15 |
Erosion of natural deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beta/photon emitters |
1/17/19 |
No |
Nd |
N/A |
0 |
50 * |
Decay of natural and |
|
(pCi/L) |
deposits |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Combined radium (pCi/L) |
1/17/19 |
No |
0.4 |
N/A |
0 |
5 |
Erosion of natural deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uranium (pCi/L) |
1/17/19 |
No |
ND |
NA |
0 |
20.1 |
Erosion of natural deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Note: The MCL for beta/photon emitters is 4 mrem/year. EPA considers 50 pCi/L to be the level of concern for beta particles.
Total Organic Carbon (TOC)
|
|
Your Water |
Range |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TT |
Monthly |
|
|
|
Compliance Method |
||
Contaminant (units) |
(RAA |
|
|
Likely Source of |
||||
Violation |
Removal |
MCLG |
TT |
(Step 1 or ACC#__) |
||||
|
Removal |
Contamination |
||||||
|
Y/N |
Ratio |
|
|
|
|||
|
Ratio) |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Low - High |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total Organic Carbon |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACC#2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Naturally present in the |
Treated Water TOC <2.0 |
||
(removal ratio) |
No |
1.0 |
1.0 |
N/A |
TT |
|||
environment |
mg/L |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disinfectant Residuals Summary
|
|
MRDL |
Your |
Range |
|
|
|
||
|
Year |
Water |
|
|
MRDLG |
MRDL |
Likely Source of Contamination |
||
|
Violation |
|
|
||||||
|
Sampled |
(highest RAA) |
Low |
High |
|
|
|
||
|
Y/N |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chlorine (ppm) |
2020 |
No |
1.16 |
0.49 – 1.63 |
4 |
4.0 |
Water additive used to |
||
control microbes |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stage 2 Disinfection Byproduct Compliance - Based upon Locational Running Annual Average (LRAA)
Disinfection |
|
MCL |
Your |
|
Range |
|
|
Likely Source of |
|
Year |
Water |
|
|
MCLG |
MCL |
||||
Byproduct |
Violation |
|
|
Contamination |
|||||
Sampled |
(highest LRAA) |
Low |
High |
|
|
||||
|
Y/N |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
TTHM (ppb) |
2020 |
No |
58.8 |
20.2 – 63.6 |
N/A |
80 |
Byproduct of drinking |
||
water disinfection |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
HAA5 (ppb) |
2020 |
No |
45.0 |
20.6 – 54.9 |
N/A |
60 |
Byproduct of drinking |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
water disinfection |
For TTHM: Some people who drink water containing trihalomethanes in excess of the MCL over many years may experience problems with their liver, kidneys, or central nervous systems, and may have an increased risk of getting cancer.
For HAA5: Some people who drink water containing haloacetic acids in excess of the MCL over many years may have an increased risk of getting cancer.
Other Miscellaneous Water Characteristics Contaminants
Contaminant (units) |
Sample Date |
Your |
Range |
|
SMCL |
|
Water |
Low |
High |
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron (ppm) |
1/7/20 |
ND |
N/A |
|
0.3 mg/L |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manganese (ppm) |
1/7/20 |
ND |
N/A |
|
0.05 mg/L |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel (ppm) |
1/7/20 |
ND |
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sodium (ppm) |
1/7/20 |
12 |
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sulfate (ppm) |
1/7/20 |
ND |
N/A |
|
250 mg/L |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pH |
1/7/20 |
7.1 |
N/A |
|
6.5 to 8.5 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cryptosporidium
Our system monitored for Cryptosporidium in 2017 none were detected.
Cryptosporidium is a microbial pathogen found in surface water throughout the U.S. Although filtration removes Cryptosporidium, the most
Additional Monitoring of Other Contaminants
Unregulated Contaminants Monitoring – UCMR 4 Study. Monitoring was conducted during 2018, 2019 and 2020.
*Unregulated Contaminants monitoring helps EPA to determine where certain contaminants occur and whether it needs to regulate those contaminants.
Cyanotoxins
Analyte (units) |
MCL |
Year Sampled |
Your Water |
Range |
MRL† |
Likely Source of |
|
Violation |
(Highest) |
Low - High |
Contamination |
||||
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No |
2018 |
ND |
N/A |
0.0300 |
Cyanobacterial algal |
||
|
|
blooms |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cylindrospermopsin µg/L |
|
|
|
|
0.0900 |
Cyanobacterial algal |
|
|
No |
2018 |
ND |
N/A |
|||
|
|
blooms |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Microcystins & Nodularins µg/L |
No |
2018 |
ND |
N/A |
0.300 |
Cyanobacterial algal |
|
|
|
blooms |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Percent CV µg/L |
No |
2018 |
9.5 |
0.4 – 9.5 |
N/A |
Cyanobacterial algal |
|
|
blooms |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unregulated Disinfection Byproducts
Contaminant (units) |
MCL |
Year |
Your Water |
Range |
MRL† |
Likely Source of |
||
Violation |
Sampled |
(Highest) |
Low |
High |
Contamination |
|||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.300 |
Byproduct of drinking water |
|
Bromochloroacetic acid (ug/L) |
No |
4.19 |
1.99 – 4.19 |
disinfection |
||||
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.48 |
|
|
0.500 |
Byproduct of drinking water |
||
Bromodichloroacetic acid (ug/L) |
No |
|
1.1 - 4.48 |
disinfection |
||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chlorodibromoacetic acid (ug/L) |
No |
1.43 |
<0.3 – 1.43 |
0.300 |
Byproduct of drinking water |
|||
|
|
disinfection |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Dibromoacetic acid (ug/L) |
No |
0.441 |
<0.3 – 0.441 |
0.300 |
Byproduct of drinking water |
|||
|
|
disinfection |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Dichloroacetic acid (ug/L) |
No |
24.1 |
8.63 – 24.1 |
0.200 |
Byproduct of drinking water |
|||
|
|
disinfection |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Monobromoacetic acid (ug/L) |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
0.300 |
Byproduct of drinking water |
||
|
|
|
disinfection |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Monochloroacetic acid (ug/L) |
No |
3.85 |
<2.0 – 3.85 |
2.00 |
Byproduct of drinking water |
|||
|
|
disinfection |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Tribromoacetic acid (ug/L) |
No |
ND |
N/A |
|
2.00 |
Byproduct of drinking water |
||
|
|
|
disinfection |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Trichloroacetic acid (ug/L) |
No |
25.6 |
9.34 – 25.6 |
0.500 |
Byproduct of drinking water |
|||
|
|
disinfection |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- EEA has demonstrated it can achieve these report limits in reagent water, but cannot document them in all sample matrices.
Unregulated Contaminants
Contaminant (units) |
MCL |
Year |
|
Range Low |
|
|
Violation |
Sampled |
Your Water (Highest) |
High |
MRL† |
||
|
||||||
Germanium (ug/L) |
No |
ND |
N/A |
0.3 |
||
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manganese (ug/L) |
No |
0.731 |
<0.4 – 0.731 |
0.4 |
||
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No |
ND |
N/A |
0.01 |
|||
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chlorpyrifos (ug/L) |
No |
ND |
N/A |
0.03 |
||
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dimethipin (ug/L) |
No |
ND |
N/A |
0.2 |
||
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ethoprop (ug/L) |
No |
ND |
N/A |
0.03 |
||
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oxyfluorfen (ug/L) |
No |
ND |
N/A |
0.05 |
||
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profenofos (ug/L) |
No |
ND |
N/A |
0.3 |
||
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tebuconazole (ug/L) |
No |
ND |
N/A |
0.2 |
||
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Permethrin, cis & trans (ug/L) |
No |
ND |
N/A |
0.04 |
||
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tribufos (ug/L) |
No |
ND |
N/A |
0.07 |
||
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Butylated hydroxyanisole (ug/L) |
No |
ND |
N/A |
0.03 |
||
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No |
ND |
N/A |
0.007 |
|||
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quinoline (ug/L) |
No |
ND |
N/A |
0.02 |
||
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No |
ND |
N/A |
2 |
|||
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No |
0.4 |
<0.4 – 0.4 |
0.4 |
|||
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No |
ND |
N/A |
0.5 |
|||
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
- EEA has demonstrated it can achieve these report limits in reagent water, but cannot document them in all sample matrices.
Source Water Contaminants – Mountain Island Lake
Contaminant (units) |
MCL |
Year |
Your Water (Highest) |
Range Low |
MRL† |
|
Violation |
Sampled |
High |
||||
|
|
|
||||
Bromide (ug/L) |
No |
29.2 |
<20 – 29.2 |
20 |
||
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Organic Carbon (TOC) (ug/L) |
No |
1730 |
<1000 - 1730 |
1000 |
||
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
† EEA has demonstrated it can achieve these report limits in reagent water, but cannot document them in all sample matrices
Contaminants
Two Rivers Utilities
EWG's drinking water quality report shows results of tests conducted by the water utility and provided to the Environmental Working Group by the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, as well as information from the U.S. EPA Enforcement and Compliance History database (ECHO). For the latest quarter assessed by the U.S. EPA (January 2019 - March 2019), tap water provided by this water utility was in compliance with federal health-based drinking water standards.
Utility details
- Serves: 80510
- Data available: 2012-2017
- Data Source: Surface water
- Total: 16
Contaminants That Exceed Guidelines
- Bromodichloromethane
- Bromoform
- Chloroform
- Chromium (hexavalent)
- Dibromochloromethane
- Dichloroacetic acid
- Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)
- Trichloroacetic acid
Other Detected Contaminants
- Chlorate
- Dibromoacetic acid
- Fluoride
- Haloacetic acids (HAA5)
- Monobromoacetic acid
- Monochloroacetic acid
- Strontium
- Vanadium
Reminder
Always take extra precautions, the water may be safe to drink when it leaves the sewage treatment plant but it may pick up pollutants during its way to your tap. We advise that you ask locals or hotel staff about the water quality. Also, note that different cities have different water mineral contents.
Sources and Resources
Sources Cited
Additional Resources
You might have never even heard of Gastonia, North Carolina, but if you live in the country you should have at least heard of this small town in the middle of the woods. The city is located off a main road and is easy to find with an Internet search.
If you are concerned about the quality of your tap water, you will want to learn as much as you can about Gastonia. The area has become a popular vacation spot for many who enjoy the peace and quiet of nature and the local restaurants that serve local, fresh produce. There is also a quaint little chapel that is part of the historical history of the area.
It is important that you know exactly what you are drinking when you use tap water in Gastonia, North Carolina. If you do not know the contaminants in the water that you use to take a bath or shower, you may not realize that they are there. While you may not be aware of it, the contaminants that are in the water will affect you.
Most people do