Table of Contents
Can You Drink Tap Water in High Point?
Yes, High Point's tap water is generally considered safe to drink as High Point has no active health based violations of the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) that we are aware of. Other factors such as lead piping in a home, or low levels of pollutants on immunocompromised individuals, should also be considered, however. To find more recent info we might have, you can check out our boil water notice page or the city's water provider website.
According the EPA’s ECHO database, from April 30, 2019 to June 30, 2022, High Point's water utility, City of High Point, had 0 violations of the Safe Drinking Water Act. For more details on the violations, please see our violation history section below. This assessment is based on the City of High Point water system, other water systems in the city may have different results.
While tap water that meets the EPA health guidelines generally won’t make you sick to your stomach, it can still contain regulated and unregulated contaminants present in trace amounts that could potentially cause health issues over the long-run. These trace contaminants may also impact immunocompromised and vulnerable individuals.
The EPA is reviewing if it’s current regulations around pollutant levels in tap water are strict enough, and the health dangers posed by unregulated pollutants, like PFAS.
Water Quality Report for High Point Tap Water
The most recent publicly available numbers for measured contaminant levels in High Point tap water are in its 2020 Water Quality Report. As you can see, there are levels which the EPA considers to be acceptable, but being below the maximum allowable level doesn’t necessarily mean the water is healthy.
Lead in tap water, for example, is currently allowed at up to 15ppb by the EPA, but it has set the ideal goal for lead at zero. This highlights how meeting EPA standards doesn’t necessarily mean local tap water is healthy.
EPA regulations continue to change as it evaluates the long term impacts of chemicals and updates drinking water acceptable levels. The rules around arsenic, as well as, lead and copper are currently being re-evaluated.
There are also a number of "emerging" contaminants that are not currently. For example, PFAS (Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), for which the EPA has issued a health advisory. PFAS are called "forever chemicals" since they tend not to break down in the environment or the human body and can accumulate over time.
We recommend looking at the contaminants present in High Point's water quality reports, or getting your home's tap water tested to see if you should be filtering your water.
High Point Tap Water Safe Drinking Water Act Violation History - Prior 10 Years
Below is a ten year history of violations for the water system named City of High Point for High Point in North Carolina. For more details please see the "What do these Violations Mean?" section below.
Is there Lead in High Point Water?
Based on the EPA’s ECHO Database, 90% of the samples taken from the High Point water system, City of High Point, between sample start date and sample end date, were at or below, 0.0 mg/L of lead in High Point water. This is 0% of the 0.015 mg/L action level. This means 10% of the samples taken from High Point contained more lead.
While High Point water testing may have found 0.0 mg/L of lead in its water, that does not mean your water source has the same amount. The amount of lead in water in a city can vary greatly from neighborhood to neighborhood, or even building to building. Many buildings, particularly older ones, have lead pipes or service lines which can be a source of contamination. To find out if your home has lead, we recommend getting you water tested.
No amount of lead in water is healthy, only less dangerous. As lead accumulates in our bodies over time, even exposure to relatively small amounts can have negative health effects. For more information, please check out our Lead FAQ page.
Are there PFAS in High Point Tap Water?
Currently, testing tap water for PFAS isn’t mandated on a national level. We do have a list of military bases where there have been suspected or confirmed leaks. There appears to be at least one military base - Tarheel Army Missile Plant - near High Point with suspected leaks.
With many potential sources of PFAS in tap water across the US, the best information we currently have about which cities have PFAS in their water is this ewg map, which you can check to see if High Point has been evaluated for yet.
Our stance is better safe than sorry, and that it makes sense to try to purify the tap water just in case.
What do these Violations Mean?
Safe Drinking Water Act Violations categories split into two groups, health based, and non-health based. Generally, health based violations are more serious, though non-health based violations can also be cause for concern.
Health Based Violations
- Maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) - maximum allowed contaminant level was exceeded.
- Maximum residual disinfectant levels (MRDLs) - maximum allowed disinfectant level was exceeded.
- Other violations (Other) - the exact required process to reduce the amounts of contaminants in drinking water was not followed.
Non-Health Based Violations
- Monitoring and reporting violations (MR, MON) - failure to conduct the required regular monitoring of drinking water quality, and/or to submit monitoring results on time.
- Public notice violations (Other) - failure to immediately alert consumers if there is a serious problem with their drinking water that may pose a risk to public health.
- Other violations (Other) - miscellaneous violations, such as failure to issue annual consumer confidence reports or maintain required records.
SDWA Table Key
Field | Description |
---|---|
Compliance Period | Dates of the compliance period. |
Status |
Current status of the violation.
|
Health-Based? | Whether the violation is health based. |
Category Code |
The category of violation that is reported.
|
Code | A full description of violation codes can be accessed in the SDWA_REF_CODE_VALUES (CSV) table. |
Contaminant Code | A code value that represents a contaminant for which a public water system has incurred a violation of a primary drinking water regulation. |
Rule Code |
Code for a National Drinking Water rule.
|
Rule Group Code |
Code that uniquely identifies a rule group.
|
Rule Family Code |
Code for rule family.
|
For more clarification please visit the EPA's data dictionary.
High Point Water - Frequently Asked Questions
By Mail: | PO BOX 230 HIGH POINT, NC, 27261 |
Existing customers can login to their City of High Point account to pay their High Point water bill by clicking here.
If you want to pay your City of High Point bill online and haven't made an account yet, you can create an account online. Please click here to create your account to pay your High Point water bill.
If you don't want to make an account, or can't remember your account, you can make a one-time payment towards your High Point water bill without creating an account using a one time payment portal with your account number and credit or debit card. Click here to make a one time payment.
Moving to a new house or apartment in High Point means you will often need to put the water in your name with City of High Point. In order to put the water in your name, please click the link to the start service form below. Start service requests for water bills typically take two business days.
Leaving your house or apartment in High Point means you will likely need to take your name off of the water bill with City of High Point. In order to take your name off the water bill, please click the link to the stop service form below. Stop service for water bills requests typically take two business days.
The estimated price of bottled water
$1.95 in USD (1.5-liter)
USER SUBMITTED RATINGS
- Drinking Water Pollution and Inaccessibility
- Water Pollution
- Drinking Water Quality and Accessibility
- Water Quality
The above data is comprised of subjective, user submitted opinions about the water quality and pollution in High Point, measured on a scale from 0% (lowest) to 100% (highest).
Related FAQS
High Point Water Quality Report (Consumer Confidence Report)
The EPA mandates that towns and cities consistently monitor and test their tap water. They must report their findings in an annual Consumer Confidence Report. Below is the most recent water quality report from High Point's Water. If you would like to see the original version of the report, please click here.
T H E C I T Y O F H I G H P O I N T
WATER
QUALITY
2020 ANNUAL DRINKING WATER QUALITY REPORT
The City of High Point has a state and federally certified testing program for your water that met or exceeded all State and Federal (EPA) standards in 2020!
HighPointNC.gov/PublicServices -
2020
ANNUAL DRINKING WATER QUALITY REPORT
The City of High Point has a state and federally certified testing program for your water that met or exceeded all State and Federal (EPA) standards in 2020.
The City of High Point is pleased to present the 2020 Annual Drinking Water Quality Report (Consumer Confidence Report) as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). This report is designed to provide details about where your water comes from, what it contains, and how it compares to standards set by regulatory agencies. This report is a snapshot of last year’s water quality.
Included in the report are details about your source(s) of water, what it contains, and how it compares to standards set by regulatory agencies. Our constant goal is to provide you with a safe and dependable supply of drinking water. We want you to understand the efforts we make to continually improve the water treatment process and protect our water resources. We are committed to ensuring the quality of your water and to providing you with this information because informed customers are our best allies. If you have any questions about this report or concerning your water, please contact The City of High Point, customer service center at (336)
Drinking water, including bottled water, may reasonably be expected to contain at least small amounts of some contaminants. The presence of contaminants does not necessarily indicate that water poses a health risk. More information about contaminants and potential health effects can be obtained by calling the Environmental Protection Agency’s Safe Drinking Water Hotline
available from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline
If present, elevated levels of lead can cause serious health problems, especially for pregnant women and young children. Lead in drinking water is primarily from materials and components associated with service lines and home plumbing. The City of High Point is responsible for providing high quality drinking water, but cannot control the variety of materials used in plumbing components. When your water has been sitting for several hours, you can minimize the potential for lead exposure by flushing your tap for 30 seconds to 2 minutes before using water for drinking or cooking. If you are concerned about lead in your water, you may wish to have your water tested. Information on lead in drinking water, testing methods, and steps you can take to minimize exposure is available from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline or at www.epa.gov/safewater/lead.
The sources of drinking water (both tap water and bottled water) include rivers, lakes, streams, ponds, reservoirs, springs, and wells. As water travels over the surface of the land or through the ground, it dissolves naturally- occurring minerals and, in some cases, radioactive material, and can pick up substances resulting from the presence of animals or from human activity. Contaminants that may be present in source water include microbial contaminants, such as viruses and bacteria, which may come from sewage treatment plants, septic systems, agricultural livestock operations, and wildlife; inorganic contaminants, such as salts and metals, which can be
In order to ensure that tap water is safe to drink, EPA prescribes regulations which limit the amount of certain contaminants in water provided by public water systems. FDA regulations establish limits for contaminants in bottled water, which must provide the same protection for public health.
HIGH POINT’S
WATER SOURCES
High Point’s water comes from a
Our water comes from rainfall and runoff in an area roughly bordered by U.S. Highway 421 to the north (above
GETTING WATER TO YOU
Most of the water consumers use is pumped from Arnold Koonce City Lake and processed into drinking water at the Ward Water Plant on Pendleton Street. We have a
There are four basic steps to treating water. First, we add alum (aluminum sulfate), speeding the removal of most dirt and other large particulate matter. This step is known as “settling”. Once completed, water is filtered to remove smaller pieces of debris and bacteria. The water is chemically treated to kill any remaining bacteria.
Next, fluoride is added to protect teeth, and chemicals to protect pipes are included. Federal, State and local health laws require these additives during treatment. Then water is stored in elevated storage tanks at the plant. Finally, it is pumped into homes and businesses in High Point and the surrounding areas.
CHANGES IN
PROCESS
On July 25, 2011, High Point, Greensboro, Piedmont Triad Regional Water Authority, Burlington and Reidsville changed their method of disinfection from free chlorine to a two- stage process. Primary disinfection is still achieved by free chlorine, but we are now using chloramines (combined chlorine and ammonia) as our secondary disinfection. This change is to help us comply with the Stage 2 disinfectant/ disinfectant
HighPointNC.gov/PublicServices
HOW WATER
GETS TO OUR CONSUMERS
The North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), Public Water Supply (PWS) Section, Source Water Assessment Program (SWAP) conducted assessments for all drinking water sources across North Carolina. The purpose of the assessments was to determine the susceptibility of each drinking water source (well or surface water intake) to Potential Contaminant Sources (PCSs). The results of the assessment are available in SWAP Assessment Reports that include maps, background information and a relative susceptibility rating of Higher, Moderate or Lower.
The relative susceptibility rating of each source for the City of High Point was determined by combining the contaminant rating (number and location of PCSs within the assessment area) and the inherent vulnerability rating (i.e., characteristics or existing conditions of the well or watershed and its delineated assessment area). The assessment findings are summarized in the table.
Susceptibility of Sources to Potential Contaminant Sources (PCSs)
Source Name |
Susceptibility Rating |
SWAP Report Date |
City Lake |
Higher |
September 2019 |
|
|
|
Oak Hollow Lake |
Higher |
September 2019 |
It is important to understand that a susceptibility rating of “higher” does not imply poor water quality, only the system’s potential to become contaminated by PCSs in the assessment area.
The complete SWAP Assessment report for the City of High Point may be viewed on the Web at: https://www.ncwater.org/?page=600 Note that because SWAP results and reports are periodically updated by the PWS Section, the results available on this web site may differ from the results that were available at the time this CCR was prepared. If you are unable to access your SWAP report on the web, you may mail a written request for a printed copy to: Source Water Assessment Program – Report Request, 1634 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC
NTU |
- |
turbidity units, used only to define this measerment |
DEFINITIONS: |
mg/L |
- |
milligrams per liter or parts per million (ppm) |
|
pCi/L |
- |
picocurries per liter, used only for radioactivity measurements |
|
< |
- |
less than |
|
- - greater than, both ara applied to numbers to indicate a bounty such as, “The number should not exceed” or “The value cannot be measured below this number”
MCL |
- |
(Maximum Contaminant Level) the greatest amount allowed in your water by law that determines whether it is safe or not. |
TT |
- |
TT: Treatment Technique: A required process inended to reduce the level of a contaminant in drinking water. |
MCLG |
- |
(Maximum Contaminant Level Goal) This would be the ideal situation. This may or may not exist anywhere on earth, |
|
|
but it is the best we wish we could achieve. |
Variances |
|
|
& Exemptions |
- |
Variances and Exemptions: State or EPA permission not to meet an MCL or a treatmetn technique under certain conditions. |
MFL |
- |
measurable fiber length. |
Heterotrophic - |
a group of bacteria that is a general indicator of many bacteria but are not health threating. |
|
Coliform |
- |
a group of very resistant bacteria usually associated with disease. |
ND |
- |
Not detected |
LRAA |
- |
The average of sample analytical results for samples taken at a particular monitoring |
|
|
location during the previous four calendar quarters under the Stage 2 Disinfection |
|
|
and Disinfection Byproducts Rule. |
MPL |
- |
State assigned Maximum Permissible Limit |
Action Level (AL) |
The concentration of a contaminant which, if exceeded, triggers treatmeent or other |
|
|
|
requirements which a water system must follow. |
MNR |
- |
MNR: Monitored not regulated |
ppm |
- |
ppm: parts per million, or milligrams per liter (mg/l) |
ppb |
- |
ppb: parts per billion, or micrograms per liter (ug/l) |
ug/l |
- |
ug/l: number of micrograms of a substance in one liter of water |
N/A |
- |
not applicable |
NR |
- |
Monitoring not required, but recommended |
MRDL |
- |
Maximum residual disinfectant level. The highest level of a disinfectant allowed |
|
|
in drinking water. There is convincing evidence that addition of a disinfectant is |
|
|
necessary for control of microbial contaminants. |
MRDLG MRDLG: - |
Maximum residual disinfection goal. The level of a drinking water disinfectant below |
|
|
|
which there is no known or expected risk to health. MRDLGs do no reflect the |
|
|
benefits of the use of disinfectants to control microbial contaminants. |
UCMR |
- |
Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule. |
ug/l |
- |
microgram per liter |
SMCL |
- |
Secondary MCL |
N/R |
- |
Not regulated |
WARD UNREGULATED CONTAMINENTS |
PTRWA UNREGULATED CONTAMINANTS |
UCMR Sampling Data |
Range of Detection |
Average |
|
|
|
PTRWA Unregulated Contaminants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source Water |
Low |
High |
|
|
|
Contaminant (units) |
Your water |
Sample Date |
Range |
|
Bromide (ug/l) |
0 |
21.089 |
2.63 |
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Total Organic Carbon (ug/l) |
3840.1 |
6968.2 |
5259.7 |
|
|
Quinoline (ppb) |
0.05 |
8/29/2018 |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
4/15/2020 |
N/A |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At the Plant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manganese (ug/l) |
0 |
1.291 |
0.7337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution System |
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 1996 Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) amendments require that once every five years EPA issue a new list of no more than 30 unregulated |
||||
HAA5 (ug/l) |
15.977 |
73.151 |
33.9832 |
|
|
|||||
HAA6Br (ug/l) |
3.18 |
10.671 |
5.56 |
|
|
contaminants to be monitored by public water systems (PWSs). |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HAA9 (ug/l) |
19.02 |
82.16 |
38.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fourth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR 4) was published in the Federal Register on December 20, 2016. UCMR 4 |
||||
Fourth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule |
|
|
|
|
|
requires monitoring for 30 chemical contaminants between 2018 and 2020 using analytical methods developed by EPA and consensus organizations. |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
This monitoring provides a basis for future regulatory actions to protect public health. |
|
|||
The 1996 Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) amendments require that once every five years EPA issue a new list of no more than 30 unregulated |
|
|
The following is a list of results detected under the UCMR4 sampling period: |
|
||||||
contaminants to be monitored by public water systems (PWSs). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fourth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR 4) was published in the Federal Register on December 20, 2016. UCMR 4
requires monitoring for 30 chemical contaminants between 2018 and 2020 using analytical methods developed by EPA and consensus organizations. This monitoring provides a basis for future regulatory actions to protect public health.
The following is a list of results detected under the UCMR4 sampling period:
HighPointNC.gov/PublicServices |
HighPointNC.gov/PublicServices |
WARD WATER PLANT REQUIRED SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT
REGULATED CONSTITUENTS TESTED OR DETECTED - JAN - DEC 2020
|
Constituent |
last found |
Last tested |
MCLG |
Potential health effect |
Likely Source of Contamination |
||
|
pH (std units) |
7.89 |
10/27/2020 |
6.5 - 8.5 |
None |
None |
||
|
Fluoride (mg/L) |
0.76 |
10/27/2020 |
4.00 |
Skeletal and dental |
Erosion of natural deposits; discharge from fertilizer & |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
aluminum factories. Water additive which promotes dental health. |
|
|
Sulfate (mg/L) |
21 |
10/27/2020 |
250 |
Diarrhea |
Natural deposits, water production |
||
|
Nitrate (mg/L) |
<1.0 |
10/27/2020 |
10 |
Methemoblobulinemia |
Animal waste, fertilizer, natural deposits, septic tanks, sewage |
||
|
Nitrite (mg/L) |
<0.10 |
10/27/2020 |
10 |
|
|
||
|
Total Coliform (/100ml) |
<1 |
12/15/2020 |
5% of Monthly |
Indicator other, potentially harmful |
Naturally present in the environment |
||
|
|
|
|
|
samples are |
bacteria may be present |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
posative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Total Trihalomethanes |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
(8 sites with a 4 quarter Local Running Annual Average) (mg/L) |
MCLG |
Potential health effect |
Likely Source of Contamination |
||||
|
|
Low= 0.016 |
High=0.060 |
|
0.80 |
Cancer, problems with liver, |
||
|
|
Last found |
LLRA |
|
|
kidneys and central nerous system |
|
|
|
B01 |
0.036 |
0.037 |
11/10/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
B02 |
0.033 |
0.035 |
11/10/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
B03 |
0.032 |
0.035 |
11/10/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
B04 |
0.031 |
0.032 |
11/10/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
B05 |
0.031 |
0.024 |
11/10/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
B06 |
0.036 |
0.039 |
11/10/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
B07 |
0.035 |
0.036 |
11/10/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
B08 |
0.035 |
0.036 |
11/10/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Total Haloacetic Acids |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
(8 sites with a 4 quarter Local Running Annual Average) (mg/L) |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Low= 0.018 |
High= 0.043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last found |
LLRA |
|
0.60 |
Cancer |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B01 |
0.031 |
0.031 |
11/10/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
B02 |
0.025 |
0.026 |
11/10/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
B03 |
0.026 |
0.029 |
11/10/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
B04 |
0.023 |
0.023 |
11/10/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
B05 |
0.023 |
0.031 |
11/10/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
B06 |
0.031 |
0.033 |
11/10/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
B07 |
0.030 |
0.030 |
11/10/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
B08 |
0.030 |
0.029 |
11/10/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last Found |
|
|
|
|
||
|
SILICA Avg. (mg/l) |
11.2 |
12/28/2020 |
4 to 14.0 |
|
|
||
|
Lead mg/L |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
(53 samples collected) |
<0.003 |
8/1/2018 |
AL=0.015 |
Infants and children can experience |
Corrosion of household plumbing, erosion of natural deposits |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
delays in mental or physical development |
|
|
HighPointNC.gov/PublicServices |
Copper mg/l |
|
|
|
|
|
||
(53 samples collected) |
0.076 |
8/7/2018 |
AL=1.3 |
Stomach distress, liver or kidney damage |
Corrosion of household plumbing, erosion of natural deposits |
|||
|
PTRWA REQUIRED SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT REGULATED
CONSTITUENTS TESTED OR DETECTED - JAN - DEC 2020
Contaminants |
MCLG or MRDLG |
MCL, TT or MRDL |
Your Water |
Low |
High |
Sample date |
Violation |
Typical Source |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chlorine (ppm) |
4 |
4 |
2.98 |
2.86 |
3.10 |
|
2020 |
No |
Water additive used to control microbes |
Chloramine (ppm) |
4 |
4 |
2.56 |
2.61 |
3.04 |
|
2020 |
No |
Water additive used to control microbes |
Fluoride (ppm) |
4 |
4 |
0.72 |
0.68 |
0.76 |
|
2020 |
No |
Erosion of natural deposits; discharge from fertilizer and aluminum factories. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water additive which promotes dental health. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turbidity |
4 |
4 |
100% samples below |
N/A |
|
|
2020 |
No |
Soil runoff |
|
|
|
TT value of 0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contaminants |
TT Violation |
Compliance Method |
Your Water |
Range Monthly Removal Ratio |
MCLG |
TT |
Typical Source |
||
|
|
|
|
Low |
High |
|
|
|
|
Total Organic Carbon |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Removal |
No |
Step 1 |
1.6 |
1.45 |
1.76 |
|
N/A |
TT |
Naturally present in the environment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contaminants |
MCLG or MRDLG |
MCL, TT or MRDL |
Your Water |
Low |
High |
Sample date |
Violation |
Typical Source |
|
Synthetic Organic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chemical Contaminants |
|
|
|
Low |
High |
|
|
Naturally present in the environment |
|
Simazine |
4 |
4 |
0.215 |
0.17 |
0.26 |
|
2020 |
No |
Herbicide runoff, aquatic weed treatmetn |
HighPointNC.gov/PublicServices |
HighPointNC.gov/PublicServices |
SAMPLES COLLECTED AT THE PTRWA WATER AT TRANSFER STATION |
|
|
SAMPLES COLLECTED AT THE WARD WATER PLANT |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Constituent |
Average found |
Range of Detection |
|
|
Constituent |
Average found |
Range of Detection |
||
|
|
Low |
High |
|
|
|
Low |
High |
|
Turbidity (NTU) |
0.279 |
0.17 |
0.78 |
|
Turbidity (NTU) |
0.041 |
0.02 |
0.12 |
|
Total Organic Carbon (mg/L) |
1.57 |
1.28 |
1.7 |
|
Total Organic Carbon (mg/L) |
2.2 |
1.83 |
2.69 |
|
Dissolved Oxygen |
93.8 |
82.1 |
103.9 |
|
Dissolved Organic Carbon (mg/L) |
2.53 |
1.9 |
4.4 |
|
UV |
N/A |
N/A |
|
|
UV |
0.05 |
0.039 |
0.082 |
|
pH (std units) |
8.01 |
6.93 |
8.51 |
|
pH (std units) |
8.37 |
7.3 |
9.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chlorine (mg/L) (Total) |
3.48 |
2.24 |
4.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alkalinity (mg/L) |
23 |
15 |
34 |
|
Chlorine (mg/L) (Total) |
2.70 |
2.65 |
3.22 |
||||||
Alkalinity (mg/L) |
32.00 |
24 |
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hardness (mg/L) |
29 |
22 |
36 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
Fluoride (mg/L) |
0.77 |
0.41 |
1.18 |
|
Hardness (mg/L) |
42 |
30 |
55 |
||||||
Fluoride (mg/L) |
0.71 |
0.45 |
1.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron (mg/L) |
<.06 |
|
<.06 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
Manganese (mg/L) |
<.01 |
|
<.01 |
|
Iron (mg/L) |
0.013 |
0.00 |
0.11 |
|
|
|
|||
Manganese (mg/L) |
0.02 |
0.02 |
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sodium (mg/L) |
15.60 |
|
15.60 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sodium (mg/L) |
35.50 |
12.0 |
25.6 |
|
Nitrate+Nitrate as Nitrogen (mg/L) |
<1 |
|
<1 |
|
Nitrate+Nitrate as Nitrogen (mg/L) |
0.22 |
0.03 |
0.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Phosphorus as Phosphorus (mg/L) |
1.05 |
|
3.1 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
Total Coliform (/100ml) |
<1 |
|
<1 |
|
Phosphate, Ortho as PO4 |
0.61 |
0.51 |
0.72 |
|
|
|
|||
Total Coliform (/100ml) |
<1 |
<1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heterotrophic Plate Count |
N/A |
|
N/A |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
Chlorine (mg/L) (Free) |
|
0.41 |
4.10 |
|
Heterotrophic Plate Count |
11.7 |
0 |
84 |
|
|
|
|||
Chlorine (mg/L) (Free) |
2.95 |
2.69 |
3.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MICROBIOLOGICAL CONTAMINANTS FROM THE PTRWA TRANSFER STATION |
|
Microbiological Contaminants in the Ward |
Distribution System |
|
|
|
|||
|
Contaminant (units) |
MCL violation |
Your water |
Likely Source of Contamination |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
Total Coliform Bacteria |
N |
* 1% |
Naturally present in the enivironment |
|
MCLG |
MCL |
Likely Source of Contamination |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fecal Coliform or E. coli |
N |
0 |
Human and animal fecal waste |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
5% of monthly samples are positive |
Naturally present in the enivironment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0(Note: The MCL is exceeded if a routine |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
sample and repeat sample are total coilform |
Human and animal fecal waste |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
postive, and one is also fecal or E. coli postive) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HighPointNC.gov/PublicServices |
HighPointNC.gov/PublicServices |
QUESTIONS ABOUT YOUR WATER?
Call the Customer Service
Phone Center at
-
883-3111 24 hours a day seven days a week.
The City of High Point
P.O. Box 230
High Point, NC 27261
Visit us: HighPointNC.gov
Created by:
The City of High Point
Communications and Public Engagement Department
211 South Hamilton St. | High Point, NC 27260
HighPointNC.gov
FOLLOW
US:
/CityofHighPoint
@CityofHighPoint
@CityofHighPoint /CityofHighPointGov
Contaminants
City of High Point
EWG's drinking water quality report shows results of tests conducted by the water utility and provided to the Environmental Working Group by the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, as well as information from the U.S. EPA Enforcement and Compliance History database (ECHO). For the latest quarter assessed by the U.S. EPA (January 2019 - March 2019), tap water provided by this water utility was in compliance with federal health-based drinking water standards.
Utility details
- Serves: 108000
- Data available: 2012-2017
- Data Source: Surface water
- Total: 17
Contaminants That Exceed Guidelines
- Bromodichloromethane
- Chloroform
- Chromium (hexavalent)
- Dibromochloromethane
- Dichloroacetic acid
- Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)
- Trichloroacetic acid
Other Detected Contaminants
- 1%2C4-Dioxane
- Chlorate
- Chromium (total)
- Dibromoacetic acid
- Fluoride
- Haloacetic acids (HAA5)
- Monobromoacetic acid
- Monochloroacetic acid
- Strontium
- Vanadium
Reminder
Always take extra precautions, the water may be safe to drink when it leaves the sewage treatment plant but it may pick up pollutants during its way to your tap. We advise that you ask locals or hotel staff about the water quality. Also, note that different cities have different water mineral contents.