Table of Contents
Can You Drink Tap Water in Odessa?
Yes, Odessa's tap water is generally considered safe to drink as Odessa has no active health based violations of the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) that we are aware of. Other factors such as lead piping in a home, or low levels of pollutants on immunocompromised individuals, should also be considered, however. To find more recent info we might have, you can check out our boil water notice page or the city's water provider website.
According the EPA’s ECHO database, from April 30, 2019 to June 30, 2022, Odessa's water utility, City of Odessa, had 2 health-based violations and 4 non-health-based violations of the Safe Drinking Water Act. For more details on the violations, please see our violation history section below. The last violation for Odessa was resolved on Feb. 28, 2021. There has been an active violation for Public Notice since Nov. 12, 2019. This assessment is based on the City of Odessa water system, other water systems in the city may have different results.
While tap water that meets the EPA health guidelines generally won’t make you sick to your stomach, it can still contain regulated and unregulated contaminants present in trace amounts that could potentially cause health issues over the long-run. These trace contaminants may also impact immunocompromised and vulnerable individuals.
The EPA is reviewing if it’s current regulations around pollutant levels in tap water are strict enough, and the health dangers posed by unregulated pollutants, like PFAS.
Water Quality Report for Odessa Tap Water
The most recent publicly available numbers for measured contaminant levels in Odessa tap water are in its 2020 Water Quality Report. As you can see, there are levels which the EPA considers to be acceptable, but being below the maximum allowable level doesn’t necessarily mean the water is healthy.
Lead in tap water, for example, is currently allowed at up to 15ppb by the EPA, but it has set the ideal goal for lead at zero. This highlights how meeting EPA standards doesn’t necessarily mean local tap water is healthy.
EPA regulations continue to change as it evaluates the long term impacts of chemicals and updates drinking water acceptable levels. The rules around arsenic, as well as, lead and copper are currently being re-evaluated.
There are also a number of "emerging" contaminants that are not currently. For example, PFAS (Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), for which the EPA has issued a health advisory. PFAS are called "forever chemicals" since they tend not to break down in the environment or the human body and can accumulate over time.
We recommend looking at the contaminants present in Odessa's water quality reports, or getting your home's tap water tested to see if you should be filtering your water.
Odessa Tap Water Safe Drinking Water Act Violation History - Prior 10 Years
Below is a ten year history of violations for the water system named City of Odessa for Odessa in Texas. For more details please see the "What do these Violations Mean?" section below.
From Feb. 1, 2021 to Feb. 28, 2021, Odessa had 2 non-health based Safe Drinking Water Act violations with the violation category being Monitoring and Reporting, more specifically, the violation code was Monitoring, Turbidity (Enhanced SWTR) which falls into the Microbials rule code group, and the Surface Water Treatment Rules rule code family for the following contaminant codes: Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule, Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule.
From Feb. 1, 2021 to Feb. 28, 2021, Odessa had 1 health-based Safe Drinking Water Act violation with the violation category being Treatment Technique Violation, more specifically, the violation code was Monthly Turbidity Exceed (Enhanced SWTR) which falls into the Microbials rule code group, and the Surface Water Treatment Rules rule code family for the following contaminant code: Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule.
For the compliance period beginning Dec. 1, 2019, Odessa had 1 non-health based Safe Drinking Water Act violation with the violation category being Other Violation, more specifically, the violation code was Public Notification Violation for NPDWR Violation which falls into the Other rule code group, and the Public Notice Rule rule code family for the following contaminant code: Public Notice.
For the compliance period beginning Nov. 12, 2019, Odessa had 1 non-health based Safe Drinking Water Act violation with the violation category being Other Violation, more specifically, the violation code was Public Notification Violation for NPDWR Violation which falls into the Other rule code group, and the Public Notice Rule rule code family for the following contaminant code: Public Notice.
From Oct. 1, 2019 to Oct. 31, 2019, Odessa had 1 health-based Safe Drinking Water Act violation with the violation category being Treatment Technique Violation, more specifically, the violation code was Monthly Turbidity Exceed (Enhanced SWTR) which falls into the Microbials rule code group, and the Surface Water Treatment Rules rule code family for the following contaminant code: Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule.
From Feb. 1, 2019 to Feb. 28, 2019, Odessa had 1 non-health based Safe Drinking Water Act violation with the violation category being Monitoring and Reporting, more specifically, the violation code was Monitoring, Turbidity (Enhanced SWTR) which falls into the Microbials rule code group, and the Surface Water Treatment Rules rule code family for the following contaminant code: Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule.
From Jan. 1, 2019 to Jan. 31, 2019, Odessa had 1 non-health based Safe Drinking Water Act violation with the violation category being Monitoring and Reporting, more specifically, the violation code was Monitoring, Turbidity (Enhanced SWTR) which falls into the Microbials rule code group, and the Surface Water Treatment Rules rule code family for the following contaminant code: Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule.
From Oct. 1, 2018 to Oct. 31, 2018, Odessa had 1 non-health based Safe Drinking Water Act violation with the violation category being Monitoring and Reporting, more specifically, the violation code was Monitoring, Turbidity (Enhanced SWTR) which falls into the Microbials rule code group, and the Surface Water Treatment Rules rule code family for the following contaminant code: Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule.
For the compliance period beginning July 1, 2018, Odessa had 1 non-health based Safe Drinking Water Act violation with the violation category being Other Violation, more specifically, the violation code was Consumer Confidence Report Complete Failure to Report which falls into the Other rule code group, and the Consumer Confidence Rule rule code family for the following contaminant code: Consumer Confidence Rule.
For the compliance period beginning Oct. 1, 2013, Odessa had 1 non-health based Safe Drinking Water Act violation with the violation category being Monitoring and Reporting, more specifically, the violation code was Follow-up Or Routine LCR Tap M/R which falls into the Chemicals rule code group, and the Lead and Copper Rule rule code family for the following contaminant code: Lead and Copper Rule.
For the compliance period beginning Oct. 1, 2012, Odessa had 1 non-health based Safe Drinking Water Act violation with the violation category being Monitoring and Reporting, more specifically, the violation code was Follow-up Or Routine LCR Tap M/R which falls into the Chemicals rule code group, and the Lead and Copper Rule rule code family for the following contaminant code: Lead and Copper Rule.
Is there Lead in Odessa Water?
Based on the EPA’s ECHO Database, 90% of the samples taken from the Odessa water system, City of Odessa, between sample start date and sample end date, were at or below, 0.0101 mg/L of lead in Odessa water. This is 67.3% of the 0.015 mg/L action level. This means 10% of the samples taken from Odessa contained more lead.
While Odessa water testing may have found 0.0101 mg/L of lead in its water, that does not mean your water source has the same amount. The amount of lead in water in a city can vary greatly from neighborhood to neighborhood, or even building to building. Many buildings, particularly older ones, have lead pipes or service lines which can be a source of contamination. To find out if your home has lead, we recommend getting you water tested.
No amount of lead in water is healthy, only less dangerous. As lead accumulates in our bodies over time, even exposure to relatively small amounts can have negative health effects. For more information, please check out our Lead FAQ page.
Are there PFAS in Odessa Tap Water?
Currently, testing tap water for PFAS isn’t mandated on a national level. We do have a list of military bases where there have been suspected or confirmed leaks. There appears to be no military bases near Odessa with suspected leaks.
With many potential sources of PFAS in tap water across the US, the best information we currently have about which cities have PFAS in their water is this ewg map, which you can check to see if Odessa has been evaluated for yet.
Our stance is better safe than sorry, and that it makes sense to try to purify the tap water just in case.
Odessa SDWA Violation History Table - Prior 10 Years
Compliance Period | Status | Health-Based? | Category Code | Code | Rule Code | Contaminant Code | Rule Group Code | Rule Family Code |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
02/01/2021 - 02/28/2021 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Turbidity (Enhanced SWTR) (38) | Long Term 1 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (122) | Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (0300) | Microbials (100) | Surface Water Treatment Rules (120) |
02/01/2021 - 02/28/2021 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Turbidity (Enhanced SWTR) (38) | Long Term 1 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (122) | Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (0300) | Microbials (100) | Surface Water Treatment Rules (120) |
02/01/2021 - 02/28/2021 | Resolved | Yes | Treatment Technique Violation (TT) | Monthly Turbidity Exceed (Enhanced SWTR) (44) | Long Term 1 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (122) | Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (0300) | Microbials (100) | Surface Water Treatment Rules (120) |
12/01/2019 - | Resolved | No | Other Violation (Other) | Public Notification Violation for NPDWR Violation (75) | Public Notice Rule (410) | Public Notice (7500) | Other (400) | Public Notice Rule (410) |
11/12/2019 - | Unaddressed | No | Other Violation (Other) | Public Notification Violation for NPDWR Violation (75) | Public Notice Rule (410) | Public Notice (7500) | Other (400) | Public Notice Rule (410) |
10/01/2019 - 10/31/2019 | Resolved | Yes | Treatment Technique Violation (TT) | Monthly Turbidity Exceed (Enhanced SWTR) (44) | Long Term 1 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (122) | Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (0300) | Microbials (100) | Surface Water Treatment Rules (120) |
02/01/2019 - 02/28/2019 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Turbidity (Enhanced SWTR) (38) | Long Term 1 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (122) | Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (0300) | Microbials (100) | Surface Water Treatment Rules (120) |
01/01/2019 - 01/31/2019 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Turbidity (Enhanced SWTR) (38) | Long Term 1 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (122) | Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (0300) | Microbials (100) | Surface Water Treatment Rules (120) |
10/01/2018 - 10/31/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Turbidity (Enhanced SWTR) (38) | Long Term 1 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (122) | Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (0300) | Microbials (100) | Surface Water Treatment Rules (120) |
07/01/2018 - | Resolved | No | Other Violation (Other) | Consumer Confidence Report Complete Failure to Report (71) | Consumer Confidence Rule (420) | Consumer Confidence Rule (7000) | Other (400) | Consumer Confidence Rule (420) |
10/01/2013 - | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Follow-up Or Routine LCR Tap M/R (52) | Lead and Copper Rule (350) | Lead and Copper Rule (5000) | Chemicals (300) | Lead and Copper Rule (350) |
10/01/2012 - | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Follow-up Or Routine LCR Tap M/R (52) | Lead and Copper Rule (350) | Lead and Copper Rule (5000) | Chemicals (300) | Lead and Copper Rule (350) |
What do these Violations Mean?
Safe Drinking Water Act Violations categories split into two groups, health based, and non-health based. Generally, health based violations are more serious, though non-health based violations can also be cause for concern.
Health Based Violations
- Maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) - maximum allowed contaminant level was exceeded.
- Maximum residual disinfectant levels (MRDLs) - maximum allowed disinfectant level was exceeded.
- Other violations (Other) - the exact required process to reduce the amounts of contaminants in drinking water was not followed.
Non-Health Based Violations
- Monitoring and reporting violations (MR, MON) - failure to conduct the required regular monitoring of drinking water quality, and/or to submit monitoring results on time.
- Public notice violations (Other) - failure to immediately alert consumers if there is a serious problem with their drinking water that may pose a risk to public health.
- Other violations (Other) - miscellaneous violations, such as failure to issue annual consumer confidence reports or maintain required records.
SDWA Table Key
Field | Description |
---|---|
Compliance Period | Dates of the compliance period. |
Status |
Current status of the violation.
|
Health-Based? | Whether the violation is health based. |
Category Code |
The category of violation that is reported.
|
Code | A full description of violation codes can be accessed in the SDWA_REF_CODE_VALUES (CSV) table. |
Contaminant Code | A code value that represents a contaminant for which a public water system has incurred a violation of a primary drinking water regulation. |
Rule Code |
Code for a National Drinking Water rule.
|
Rule Group Code |
Code that uniquely identifies a rule group.
|
Rule Family Code |
Code for rule family.
|
For more clarification please visit the EPA's data dictionary.
Odessa Water - Frequently Asked Questions
By Mail: | PO BOX 4398 ODESSA, TX, 79760-4398 |
Existing customers can login to their City of Odessa account to pay their Odessa water bill by clicking here.
If you want to pay your City of Odessa bill online and haven't made an account yet, you can create an account online. Please click here to create your account to pay your Odessa water bill.
If you don't want to make an account, or can't remember your account, you can make a one-time payment towards your Odessa water bill without creating an account using a one time payment portal with your account number and credit or debit card. Click here to make a one time payment.
Moving to a new house or apartment in Odessa means you will often need to put the water in your name with City of Odessa. In order to put the water in your name, please click the link to the start service form below. Start service requests for water bills typically take two business days.
Leaving your house or apartment in Odessa means you will likely need to take your name off of the water bill with City of Odessa. In order to take your name off the water bill, please click the link to the stop service form below. Stop service for water bills requests typically take two business days.
The estimated price of bottled water
$1.67 in USD (1.5-liter)
USER SUBMITTED RATINGS
- Drinking Water Pollution and Inaccessibility
- Water Pollution
- Drinking Water Quality and Accessibility
- Water Quality
The above data is comprised of subjective, user submitted opinions about the water quality and pollution in Odessa, measured on a scale from 0% (lowest) to 100% (highest).
Related FAQS
Odessa Water Quality Report (Consumer Confidence Report)
The EPA mandates that towns and cities consistently monitor and test their tap water. They must report their findings in an annual Consumer Confidence Report. Below is the most recent water quality report from Odessa's Water. If you would like to see the original version of the report, please click here.
Ector County Utility District
2020 Water Quality Report PWS No. TX0680235
This annual report provides information on the Ector County Utility District’s drinking water. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requires that all drinking water suppliers in the country provide a water quality report to their customers on an annual basis.
Ector County Utility District receives all of its water by
contract from the City of Odessa.
Drinking water, including bottled water, may reasonably be expected to contain at least small amounts of some contaminants. The presence of contaminants does not necessarily indicate that water poses a health risk. More information about contaminants and potential health effects can be obtained by calling the EPAs Safe Drinking Water Hotline at (800)
sobre el agua potable. Si tiene preguntas o comentarios sobre este informe en español, favor de llamar al tel. (432)
The Ector County Utility District is currently in the construction phase of the TCEQ Compliance Projects. These include a new 42nd St. Pump Station with 4 MG ground storage, two elevated storage tanks located on Knox Ave. and Tripp Ave. for a combined storage capacity of 2.5 MG, and 30”, 24”, and 16” water transmission lines designed to improve our water system.
Where Do We Get Our Drinking Water? The City purchases all of its water, untreated, from the Colorado River Municipal Water District (CRMWD). The majority of the water is surface water from Lake Ivie (Runnels County), Lake Thomas (Scurry County), and Lake Spence (Coke County). Groundwater or wells are also sources for our drinking water supply. The City may receive water from Ward and Martin Counties wells as needed to meet water system demands. The TCEQ completed an assessment of our source water and results indicate that some of our sources are susceptible to certain contaminants. The sampling requirements for our water system are based on this susceptibility and previous sample data. Any detection of these contaminants may be found in this Consumer Confidence Report. For more information on source water assessments and protection efforts at our system, please contact us.
Water Sources: The sources of drinking water (both tap water and bottled water) include rivers, lakes, streams, ponds, reservoirs, springs, and wells. As water travels over
the surface of the land or through the ground, it dissolves naturally occurring minerals and, in some cases, radioactive material, and can pick up substances resulting from the presence of Contaminants that may be present in the source:
Microbial contaminants, such as viruses and bacteria, which may come from sewage treatment plants, septic systems, agricultural livestock operations.
Inorganic contaminants, such as salts and metals, which can be
Pesticides and herbicides, which may come from a variety of sources such as agriculture & urban storm water runoff. Organic chemical contaminants, including synthetic and volatile organic chemicals, which are
Radioactive contaminants, which can be
Special Notice for the ELDERLY, INFANTS, CANCER PATIENTS, and people with HIV/AIDS or other immune problems: You may be more vulnerable than the general population to certain microbial contaminants, such as Cryptosporidium, in drinking water. Infants, some elderly, or immunocompromised persons such as those undergoing treatment with steroids; and people with HIV/AIDS or other immune system disorders can be particularly at risk from infections. You should seek advice about drinking water from your physician or health care provider. Additional guidelines on appropriate means to lessen the risk of infection by Cryptosporidium are available from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline at (800)
If present, elevated levels of lead can cause serious health problems, especially for pregnant women and young children. Lead in drinking water is primarily from materials and components associated with service lines and home plumbing. The Ector County Utility District is responsible for providing high quality drinking water, but cannot control the variety of materials used in plumbing components. When your water has been sitting for several hours, you can minimize the potential for lead exposure by flushing your tap for 30 seconds to 2 minutes before using water for drinking or cooking. If you are concerned about lead in your water, you may wish to have your water
tested. Information on lead in drinking water, testing methods, and steps you can take to minimize exposure is available from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline or at http://www.epa.gov/safewater/lead.
About the Tables Contained In This Report. The tables in this report list all of the federally regulated or monitored constituents, which have been found in Odessa’s water.
The EPA requires testing of up to 97 constituents. The concentrations (MCL and MCLG) of these standards are set by the EPA based on the potential health effects of the regulated constituent in the public water supply. The data presented in the report is from the most recent testing done in accordance with regulations. The following abbreviations/definitions are used in the tables:
Action level – The concentration of a contaminant which, if exceeded, triggers treatment or other requirements which a water system must follow
Action Level Goal (ALG) – The level of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is no know or expected risk to health. ALGs allow for a margin of safety.
Avg – Regulatory compliance with some MCLs are based on running annual average of monthly samples.
Level 1 Assessment – a Level 1 assessment is a study of the water system to identify potential problems and determine (if possible) why total coliform bacteria have been found in our water system.
Level 2 Assessment – a Level 2 assessment is a very detailed study of the water system to identify potential problems and determine (if possible) why an E. coli MCL violation has occurred and/or why total coliform bacteria have been found in our water system on multiple occasion.
MFL – million fibers per liter (a measure of asbestos)
Mrem – millirems per year (a measure of radiation absorbed by the body
NTU - Nephelometric Turbidity Units (a measure of turbidity)
ppb - parts per billion, or micrograms per liter (µg/L). pCi/L - picocuries per liter (a measure of radioactivity). ppt – parts per trillion, or nanograms per liter.
ppm - parts per million, or milligrams per liter (mg/L)
ppq – parts per quadrillion, or pictograms per liter na – not applicable
Maximum Contaminant Level Goal (MCLG) - The level of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected health risk to health. MCLG’s allow for a margin of safety.
Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) - The highest level of a containment that is allowed in drinking water. MCL’s are
set as close to the MCLG as feasible using the best available treatment technology.
Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level Goal (MRDLG) – The level of a drinking water disinfectant below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MRDLGs do not reflect the benefits of the use of disinfectants to control microbial contamination.
Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level (MRDL) – The highest level of disinfectant allowed in drinking water. There is convincing evidence that addition of a disinfectant is necessary for control of microbial contaminants
The table below lists all of the federally regulated or monitored constituent which have been found in the drinking water.
Substance |
Highest Level |
Range of |
MCLG |
MCL |
Units |
Violation |
Likely Source of |
|
Detected |
Individual |
|
|
|
|
Contamination |
|
|
Samples |
|
|
|
|
|
Barium (ppm) |
0.16 |
2 |
2 |
Ppm |
N |
Drilling waste; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
erosion of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
natural deposits |
Cyanide (ppb) |
108 |
108 – 108 |
200 |
200 |
Ppb |
N |
Discharge from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
manufacturing |
Fluoride (ppm) |
0.3 |
0.291 – 0.291 |
4 |
4.0 |
Ppm |
N |
Natural geology; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
supplement |
Nitrate (ppm, |
1 |
0.396 – 0.93 |
10 |
10 |
Ppm |
N |
Runoff from |
measured as |
|
|
|
|
|
|
fertilizer use. |
Nitrogen) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nitrate Advisory – Nitrate in drinking water at levels above 10 ppm is a health risk for infants of less than six months of age. High nitrate levels in drinking water can cause blue baby syndrome. Nitrate levels may rise quickly for short periods of time, because of rainfall or agricultural activity. If you are caring for an infant, you should ask advice from your health care provider.
Turbidity is a measurement of the cloudiness of the water caused by suspended particles. We monitor it because it is a good indicator of water quality and the effectiveness of our filtration.
Description |
Level Detected |
Limit (Treatment |
Unit of |
Violation |
Source of |
|
|
Techniques) |
Measurement |
|
Contamination |
Highest Single |
0.8 |
1 |
NTU |
N |
Soil runoff |
Measurement |
|
|
|
|
|
Lowest Monthly % |
97% |
0.3 |
NTU |
N |
Soil runoff |
Meeting Limit |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Coliform bacteria are used as indicators of microbial contamination of drinking water because testing for them is easy. While not disease- causing organisms themselves, they are often found in association with other microbes that are capable of causing disease. Coliform bacteria are more hardy than many
Maximum |
Total Coliform |
Highest No. of |
Fecal Coliform or E. |
Total No. of |
Violation |
Source of |
Contaminant |
Maximum |
Positive |
Coli Maximum |
Positive E. |
|
Contamination |
Level Goal |
Contaminant |
|
Contaminant Level |
Coli or Fecal |
|
|
|
Level |
|
|
Coliform |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Samples |
|
|
0 |
1 Positive |
2 |
|
0 |
N |
Naturally present in |
|
Monthly Sample |
|
|
|
|
environment. |
Lead and Copper - Lead and copper is analyzed once every three years by rule. Samples are collected from 50 sites in the system based on age of area associated with plumbing codes of the time.
Year |
Constituent |
The 90th |
# of Sites |
Action Level |
MCLG |
Unit of |
Violation |
Source of |
|
|
Percentile |
Exceeding |
|
|
Measure |
|
Contamination |
|
|
|
Action Level |
|
|
|
|
|
2019 |
Lead |
0 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
Ppb |
N |
Household |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plumbing |
2019 |
Copper |
0.0594 |
0 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
Ppm |
N |
Household |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plumbing |
Radioactive Contaminants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*EPA considers 50 pCi/L to be the level of concern for beta particles |
|
|||||||||||||||
Year |
|
Constituent |
Highest |
|
Range of |
|
MCL |
|
MCLG |
|
Unit of |
|
Violation |
|
Source of |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level |
|
Levels |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measure |
|
|
|
|
Constituent |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Detected |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
2017 |
|
|
Beta/photon |
|
6.1 |
|
|
6.1 – 6.1 |
|
50 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
pCi/L |
|
N |
|
|
Decay of |
|
|||||
|
|
|
Emitters |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
natural and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
deposits |
|
2017 |
|
|
Uranium |
|
1.5 |
|
|
1.5 – 1.5 |
|
30 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
ug/l |
|
N |
|
Erosion of |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
natural |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
deposits |
|
Disinfectant Residuals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Constituent |
|
|
|
Annual |
Range of Detected Levels |
|
MRDL for |
|
|
MRDLG |
|
Unit of |
|
Violation |
|
|
Source of |
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
Average |
|
from Single Sample |
|
|
Annual |
|
|
|
|
Measure |
|
|
|
|
Constituent |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum |
|
|
Maximum |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Chloramines |
|
|
3.22 |
|
0.39 |
|
|
4.18 |
|
|
4.10 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
ppm |
|
N |
|
Disinfectant |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
used to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
control |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
microbes |
|
Disinfection Byproducts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Constituent |
|
Highest Level |
|
Range of |
|
|
MCLG |
|
MCL |
|
Units |
|
Violation |
|
Source of |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Detected Avg. |
|
Individual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Constituent |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Samples |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total |
|
49 |
|
|
3.66 – 56.6 |
|
No Goal for |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Trihalomethanes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the Total |
|
|
|
|
Ppb |
|
|
N |
|
|
||||||||
(TTHM) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
drinking water |
|
|||
Total Haloacetic |
|
20 |
|
|
2 – 20.5 |
|
No Goal for |
|
|
60 |
|
Ppb |
|
|
N |
|
|
chlorination. |
|
||||||||
Acids (HAA5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water Loss
Water loss and accountability is reported annually to the Texas Water Development Board. Water loss is based on the amount of water metered for delivery exiting the Water Treatment Plant less the amount of water accounted for as metered to the customers throughout the system. Numerous factors account for the ‘loss’ of water including line breaks, filter backwash, weeping mains, theft, water quality flushing, and meter inaccuracy.
Description |
Produced Water |
Metered Water |
Water Losses |
Lost Water |
10 Year Target |
|
(Gallons) |
(Gallons) |
(Gallons) |
GPCD |
GPCD |
Water |
7,278,071,000 |
568,926,000 |
79,240,306 |
39.06 |
10.0 |
Accountability |
|
|
|
|
|
Questions or Comments? The Ector County Utility District values your comments on the Water Quality Report as well as on other issues relating to water quality or provision of water service. No meetings concerning this report are scheduled. If you have any comments or questions or would like additional conservation information, please contact us by calling
Violations
Public Notification Rule
The Public Notification Rule helps to ensure that consumers will always know if there is a problem with their drinking water. These notices immediately alert consumers if there is a serious problem with their drinking water (e.g., a boil water emergency).
Violation Type |
Violation Begin |
Violation End |
Violation Explanation |
|
|
|
|
PUBLIC NOTICE RULE LINKED TO VIOLATION |
01/12/2020 |
04/27/2020 |
We failed to adequately notify you, our drinking water consumers, about a violation of the drinking water regulations. |
|
|
|
|
Contaminants
City of Odessa
EWG's drinking water quality report shows results of tests conducted by the water utility and provided to the Environmental Working Group by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, as well as information from the U.S. EPA Enforcement and Compliance History database (ECHO). For the latest quarter assessed by the U.S. EPA (January 2019 - March 2019), tap water provided by this water utility was in compliance with federal health-based drinking water standards.
Utility details
- Serves: 97802
- Data available: 2012-2017
- Data Source: Surface water
- Total: 30
Contaminants That Exceed Guidelines
- Arsenic
- Bromodichloromethane
- Bromoform
- Chloroform
- Chromium (hexavalent)
- Dibromochloromethane
- Dichloroacetic acid
- Nitrate
- Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)
- Trichloroacetic acid
- Uranium
Other Detected Contaminants
- Aluminum
- Antimony
- Atrazine
- Barium
- Bromochloroacetic acid
- Chlorate
- Chromium (total)
- Cyanide
- Dibromoacetic acid
- Dibromomethane
- Fluoride
- Haloacetic acids (HAA5)
- Manganese
- Molybdenum
- Monobromoacetic acid
- Monochloroacetic acid
- Selenium
- Strontium
- Vanadium
Reminder
Always take extra precautions, the water may be safe to drink when it leaves the sewage treatment plant but it may pick up pollutants during its way to your tap. We advise that you ask locals or hotel staff about the water quality. Also, note that different cities have different water mineral contents.
Sources and Resources
Sources Cited
Additional Resources
The City of Odessa has initiated a project that could potentially provide RO water to all citywide. This means better quality water, longer-lasting appliances, and equipment, & cost savings.
The City buys all of its water, untreated, from the Colorado River Municipal Water District (CRMWD). The majority of the water is surface water from Lake Ivie (Runnels County), Lake Thomas (Scurry County), and Lake Spence (Coke County). Groundwater or wells are also sources for our drinking water supply.
The City may get water from Ward and Martin Counties’ wells to meet water system needs. The TCEQ performed an assessment of our source water, and results show that some of our sources are susceptible to specific contaminants.