Table of Contents
Can You Drink Tap Water in Spartanburg?
Yes, Spartanburg's tap water is generally considered safe to drink as Spartanburg has no active health based violations of the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) that we are aware of. Other factors such as lead piping in a home, or low levels of pollutants on immunocompromised individuals, should also be considered, however. To find more recent info we might have, you can check out our boil water notice page, the city's water provider website, or Spartanburg's local Twitter account.
According the EPA’s ECHO database, from April 30, 2019 to June 30, 2022, Spartanburg's water utility, Spartanburg Water System (4210001), had 2 health-based violations of the Safe Drinking Water Act. For more details on the violations, please see our violation history section below. The last violation for Spartanburg was resolved on June 30, 2021. This assessment is based on the Spartanburg Water System (4210001) water system, other water systems in the city may have different results.
While tap water that meets the EPA health guidelines generally won’t make you sick to your stomach, it can still contain regulated and unregulated contaminants present in trace amounts that could potentially cause health issues over the long-run. These trace contaminants may also impact immunocompromised and vulnerable individuals.
The EPA is reviewing if it’s current regulations around pollutant levels in tap water are strict enough, and the health dangers posed by unregulated pollutants, like PFAS.
Water Quality Report for Spartanburg Tap Water
The most recent publicly available numbers for measured contaminant levels in Spartanburg tap water are in its 2020 Water Quality Report. As you can see, there are levels which the EPA considers to be acceptable, but being below the maximum allowable level doesn’t necessarily mean the water is healthy.
Lead in tap water, for example, is currently allowed at up to 15ppb by the EPA, but it has set the ideal goal for lead at zero. This highlights how meeting EPA standards doesn’t necessarily mean local tap water is healthy.
EPA regulations continue to change as it evaluates the long term impacts of chemicals and updates drinking water acceptable levels. The rules around arsenic, as well as, lead and copper are currently being re-evaluated.
There are also a number of "emerging" contaminants that are not currently. For example, PFAS (Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), for which the EPA has issued a health advisory. PFAS are called "forever chemicals" since they tend not to break down in the environment or the human body and can accumulate over time.
We recommend looking at the contaminants present in Spartanburg's water quality reports, or getting your home's tap water tested to see if you should be filtering your water.
Spartanburg Tap Water Safe Drinking Water Act Violation History - Prior 10 Years
Below is a ten year history of violations for the water system named Spartanburg Water System (4210001) for Spartanburg in South Carolina. For more details please see the "What do these Violations Mean?" section below.
From Jan. 1, 2021 to June 30, 2021, Spartanburg had 1 health-based Safe Drinking Water Act violation with the violation category being Treatment Technique Violation, more specifically, the violation code was WQP Entry Point/Tap Treatment Technique Non-Compliance which falls into the Chemicals rule code group, and the Lead and Copper Rule rule code family for the following contaminant code: Lead and Copper Rule.
From July 1, 2020 to Dec. 31, 2020, Spartanburg had 1 health-based Safe Drinking Water Act violation with the violation category being Treatment Technique Violation, more specifically, the violation code was WQP Entry Point/Tap Treatment Technique Non-Compliance which falls into the Chemicals rule code group, and the Lead and Copper Rule rule code family for the following contaminant code: Lead and Copper Rule.
Is there Lead in Spartanburg Water?
Based on the EPA’s ECHO Database, 90% of the samples taken from the Spartanburg water system, Spartanburg Water System (4210001), between sample start date and sample end date, were at or below, 0.0 mg/L of lead in Spartanburg water. This is 0% of the 0.015 mg/L action level. This means 10% of the samples taken from Spartanburg contained more lead.
While Spartanburg water testing may have found 0.0 mg/L of lead in its water, that does not mean your water source has the same amount. The amount of lead in water in a city can vary greatly from neighborhood to neighborhood, or even building to building. Many buildings, particularly older ones, have lead pipes or service lines which can be a source of contamination. To find out if your home has lead, we recommend getting you water tested.
No amount of lead in water is healthy, only less dangerous. As lead accumulates in our bodies over time, even exposure to relatively small amounts can have negative health effects. For more information, please check out our Lead FAQ page.
Are there PFAS in Spartanburg Tap Water?
Currently, testing tap water for PFAS isn’t mandated on a national level. We do have a list of military bases where there have been suspected or confirmed leaks. There appears to be at least one military base - AASF Upstate - near Spartanburg with suspected leaks.
With many potential sources of PFAS in tap water across the US, the best information we currently have about which cities have PFAS in their water is this ewg map, which you can check to see if Spartanburg has been evaluated for yet.
Our stance is better safe than sorry, and that it makes sense to try to purify the tap water just in case.
Spartanburg SDWA Violation History Table - Prior 10 Years
Compliance Period | Status | Health-Based? | Category Code | Code | Rule Code | Contaminant Code | Rule Group Code | Rule Family Code |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01/01/2021 - 06/30/2021 | Resolved | Yes | Treatment Technique Violation (TT) | WQP Entry Point/Tap Treatment Technique Non-Compliance (59) | Lead and Copper Rule (350) | Lead and Copper Rule (5000) | Chemicals (300) | Lead and Copper Rule (350) |
07/01/2020 - 12/31/2020 | Resolved | Yes | Treatment Technique Violation (TT) | WQP Entry Point/Tap Treatment Technique Non-Compliance (59) | Lead and Copper Rule (350) | Lead and Copper Rule (5000) | Chemicals (300) | Lead and Copper Rule (350) |
What do these Violations Mean?
Safe Drinking Water Act Violations categories split into two groups, health based, and non-health based. Generally, health based violations are more serious, though non-health based violations can also be cause for concern.
Health Based Violations
- Maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) - maximum allowed contaminant level was exceeded.
- Maximum residual disinfectant levels (MRDLs) - maximum allowed disinfectant level was exceeded.
- Other violations (Other) - the exact required process to reduce the amounts of contaminants in drinking water was not followed.
Non-Health Based Violations
- Monitoring and reporting violations (MR, MON) - failure to conduct the required regular monitoring of drinking water quality, and/or to submit monitoring results on time.
- Public notice violations (Other) - failure to immediately alert consumers if there is a serious problem with their drinking water that may pose a risk to public health.
- Other violations (Other) - miscellaneous violations, such as failure to issue annual consumer confidence reports or maintain required records.
SDWA Table Key
Field | Description |
---|---|
Compliance Period | Dates of the compliance period. |
Status |
Current status of the violation.
|
Health-Based? | Whether the violation is health based. |
Category Code |
The category of violation that is reported.
|
Code | A full description of violation codes can be accessed in the SDWA_REF_CODE_VALUES (CSV) table. |
Contaminant Code | A code value that represents a contaminant for which a public water system has incurred a violation of a primary drinking water regulation. |
Rule Code |
Code for a National Drinking Water rule.
|
Rule Group Code |
Code that uniquely identifies a rule group.
|
Rule Family Code |
Code for rule family.
|
For more clarification please visit the EPA's data dictionary.
Spartanburg Water - Frequently Asked Questions
By Mail: | SPARTANBURG WATER SYSTEM PO BOX 251 SPARTANBURG, SC, 29304 |
Existing customers can login to their Spartanburg Water System (4210001) account to pay their Spartanburg water bill by clicking here.
If you want to pay your Spartanburg Water System (4210001) bill online and haven't made an account yet, you can create an account online. Please click here to create your account to pay your Spartanburg water bill.
If you don't want to make an account, or can't remember your account, you can make a one-time payment towards your Spartanburg water bill without creating an account using a one time payment portal with your account number and credit or debit card. Click here to make a one time payment.
Moving to a new house or apartment in Spartanburg means you will often need to put the water in your name with Spartanburg Water System (4210001). In order to put the water in your name, please click the link to the start service form below. Start service requests for water bills typically take two business days.
Leaving your house or apartment in Spartanburg means you will likely need to take your name off of the water bill with Spartanburg Water System (4210001). In order to take your name off the water bill, please click the link to the stop service form below. Stop service for water bills requests typically take two business days.
The estimated price of bottled water
$1.29 in USD (1.5-liter)
USER SUBMITTED RATINGS
- Drinking Water Pollution and Inaccessibility
- Water Pollution
- Drinking Water Quality and Accessibility
- Water Quality
The above data is comprised of subjective, user submitted opinions about the water quality and pollution in Spartanburg, measured on a scale from 0% (lowest) to 100% (highest).
Related FAQS
Spartanburg Water Quality Report (Consumer Confidence Report)
The EPA mandates that towns and cities consistently monitor and test their tap water. They must report their findings in an annual Consumer Confidence Report. Below is the most recent water quality report from Spartanburg's Water. If you would like to see the original version of the report, please click here.
2020 WATER QUALITYREPORT |
|
|
|
SPARTANBURG WATER ID#4210001 |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Polk Co |
|
|
|
|
Rutherford Co |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Spartanburg Water is pleased |
|
LANDRUM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
11 Fingerville CHESNEE |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
SC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
SC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAMPOBELLO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
|||||
to present you with our 2020 |
|
|
|
LAKE BOWEN RESERVOIR 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cher |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
U |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LAKE BLALOCK |
|
kee |
|
||||||||
o |
|
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Co |
Cherokee Co. |
||||||||
7 |
176 |
|
|
|
|
|
SC |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
C |
35 |
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
e |
|
INMAN |
#$"! |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Water Quality Report. |
l |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
l |
C |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
i |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
v |
S |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
n |
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
COWPENS |
|
||||||||
e |
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#$"! |
85 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metro B#$"! |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
In order to protect you, our valued customer, the United States |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LYMANWELLFORD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the South Carolina |
|
|
|
|
|
SPARTANBURG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
GREER |
DUNCAN |
|
|
US 29 |
|
US |
176 |
|
|
|
Goucher |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC) have |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CENTRAL PACOLET |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
SC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PACOLET |
||||||
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
established strict standards for drinking water. These standards protect |
|
#$"! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REIDVILLE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
consumers from waterborne disease organisms and harmful chemicals. |
|
|
SC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|||
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
Jonesville |
|||||||
|
|
|
1 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S |
|
|
|
||
On an annual basis, the EPA requires all public water systems to provide |
|
|
|
|
S |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
SC |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
customers with information about water quality and compliance with |
le Co. |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SC |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
Co |
|
||||
environmental standards through Water Quality Reports. |
|
|
|
|
|
WOODRUFF |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#$"! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n |
Communities Served by |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
io |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U |
Spartamburg Water System |
|||
Spartanburg Water is committed to exceptional water quality. This dedication |
|
|
|
|
Laure |
|
|
|
|
SC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale Water Service |
|||||
includes our participation in the South Carolina |
|
|
|
ns |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Union Co. |
||||
|
|
|
|
Co |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail Water Service |
(AWOP), which focuses on treatment enhancements. R.B. Simms received an AWOP award |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
as well as the AWOP 10 Year Award for achieving the program goals. Spartanburg Water |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
continues to partner with the EPA and American Water Works Association (AWWA) as a member of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
the Partnership for Safe Water. R.B. Simms received the Director’s Award for this program. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source Water Assessment
The Safe Drinking Water Act Amendments of 1996 required DHEC to perform a source water assessment for all drinking water supplies in South Carolina. This assessment consists of the following key elements: determining the geographic boundaries for each water supply, preparing a list of potential contamination sources within each area and assessing the potential for pollutants to enter the water supply. DHEC has completed the source water assessment for our water system. Potential contaminants identified in the report include volatile organic compounds (VOCs), petroleum products, metals, nitrates, pesticides/herbicides, and pathogens. Potential sources of these contaminants include gas stations, dry cleaners, agricultural areas, automobile repair shops, septic systems, and facilities where potential contaminants are used or stored.
We test our drinking water for more than 150 substances. Most of the results show that contaminants are not present in our drinking water, but there are some exceptions. The tables on the following pages list all the regulated drinking water contaminants that were detected during the 2020 Calendar year, except if otherwise noted. Most samples were taken at the treatment plant at a point just before the water enters our distribution system, but trihalomethanes, haloacetic acids, and lead and copper compliance samples were monitored from customer taps throughout the distribution system. State and federal regulations do not require us to examine the water for all contaminants during each calendar year. The information provided in these tables represents the most recent samples taken in accordance with the applicable regulations.
For more information about the state’s source water assessment program or watersheds, visit
Where Does Our Water Come from?
Spartanburg Water draws water from three
Lake Bowen, formed by the South Pacolet River and its tributaries, flows into Municipal Reservoir #1. The entire watershed for these lakes lies in Spartanburg and Eastern Greenville Counties. The R.B. Simms Water Treatment Facility treats the water from these lakes.
The North Pacolet River and its tributaries combine with the Lake Bowen/Reservoir #1 system to form Lake Blalock. The watershed for this lake lies in South Carolina and North Carolina. The Myles W. Whitlock, Jr. Water Treatment Facility treats the water from Lake Blalock.
What’s in Our Water?
The sources of drinking water (both tap water and bottled water) include rivers, lakes, streams, ponds, reservoirs, springs and wells. As water travels over the surface of the land or through the ground,
it dissolves naturally occurring minerals, and in some cases, radioactive material, and can pick up substances resulting from the presence of animals or from human activity. These substances are called “contaminants.”
IMPORTANT
HEALTH INFORMATION
Certain individuals can be more vulnerable to contaminants in drinking
CONTAMINANTS THAT CAN BE PRESENT IN WATER INCLUDE:
- Microbial contaminants, such as viruses and bacteria, which may come from sewage treatment plants, septic systems, agricultural livestock operations and wildlife;
- Inorganic contaminants, such as salts and metals, which can be naturally occurring or result from urban storm water runoff, industrial or domestic wastewater discharges, oil and gas production, mining or farming;
- Pesticides and herbicides, which may come from a variety of sources such as agriculture, urban storm runoff and residential use;
-
Organic chemical contaminants, including synthetic and volatile organic chemicals, which are
by-products of industrial processes and petroleum production and can also
come from gas stations, urban storm water runoff and septic systems;
- Radioactive contaminants, which can be naturally occurring or be the result of oil and gas production and mining activities.
Drinking water, including bottled water, may reasonably be expected to contain at least small amounts of some contaminants. The presence of contaminants does not necessarily indicate that water poses a health risk. More information about contaminants and potential health effects can be obtained by calling the EPA’s Safe Drinking Water Hotline
water than the general population.
DISINFECTANTS AND DISINFECTION BYPRODUCTS MEASURED IN THE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
Substance |
|
MRDLG |
|
MRDL |
|
Highest |
|
Range of |
|
Date of |
|
Was MRDL or |
|
Typical |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
MCLG |
|
MCL |
|
Level Found |
|
Levels Found |
|
Sample |
|
MCL Exceeded? |
|
Source |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chlorine |
|
4 ppm |
|
4 ppm |
|
1.66 ppm |
|
0.78 |
– 1.66 |
|
2020 |
|
No |
|
Added for disinfection |
Chlorine Dioxide |
|
800 ppb |
|
800 ppb |
|
ND |
|
|
ND |
|
2020 |
|
No |
|
Added for disinfection |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chlorite |
|
0.8 ppm |
|
1 ppm |
|
0.67 ppm |
|
ND – 0.67 |
|
2020 |
|
No |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Trihalomethanes |
|
0 |
|
80 ppb* |
|
LRAA= 56 ppb |
|
18 |
– 86 |
|
2020 |
|
No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Haloacetic Acids |
|
0 |
|
60 ppb* |
|
LRAA= 31 ppb |
|
19 |
– 39 |
|
2020 |
|
No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Compliance for Trihalomethanes and Haloacetic Acids are based on Locational Running Annual Averages (LRAA), not individual sample values. The calculated LRAA may include data from 2019 not reported on this table while range of levels found represents samples collected during 2020 only.
Contaminant
Total Coliform
COLIFORM BACTERIA MEASURED IN THE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
MCLG |
TT |
Result |
Date of Sample |
Was TT exceeded? |
N/A |
TT* |
No positive E. coli results |
2020 |
No |
|
|
|
|
|
Typical Source
Naturally present in the environment
Units of Measurement
- ppm (Parts per Million): This is the same as milligrams per liter, or the equivalent of one penny out of ten thousand dollars.
- ppb (Parts per Billion): This is the same as micrograms per liter, or the equivalent of one penny out of ten million dollars.
- SU (Standard Units): Unit of measure to indicate how acidic or basic water is on the pH scale.
- NTU (Nephelometric Turbidity Units): Units of measure to indicate water clarity.
On April 1, 2016 SCDHEC required Public Water Systems to implement the Revised Total Coliform Rule (RTCR).
*Under RTCR a Treatment Technique (TT*) violation is defined as any of the following:
-
E.
Coli-positive repeat sample following a totalcoliform-positive routine sample -
Total
coliform-positive repeat sample following an E. coli routine sample -
Failure to take all required repeat samples following an E.
coli-positive routine sample - Failure to test for E. coli when any repeat sample tests positive for total coliform
PUBLIC NOTICE
To Our Spartanburg Water Customers:
Under the State Primary Drinking Water Regulation (SPDWR), Section
The Commission of Public Works of the City of Spartanburg, SC, dba “Spartanburg Water System” System ID# 4210001, is required to maintain a minimum pH of 6.5 measured at a number of pre- determined monitoring sites within the distribution system.
During 2020, Spartanburg Water System was required to test for pH at several
What does this mean?
Spartanburg Water System is issuing this notification as required by State Primary Drinking Water Regulation. All Spartanburg Water System customers should feel confident that their water is safe to drink. There are no adverse health effects associated with these pH levels.
What is being done?
Spartanburg Water System is taking steps to ensure that pH is maintained within optimal ranges. These steps will include more frequent measurement of pH at additional locations within the water transmission system and enhanced water distribution system monitoring and flushing practices.
For additional questions and information, please contact Bryan Bates, Director of Drinking Water Services, at (864)
Lead and Copper
If present, elevated levels of lead can cause serious health problems, especially for pregnant women and young children. Lead in drinking water is primarily from materials and components associated with service lines and home plumbing. Spartanburg Water is responsible for providing high quality drinking water, but cannot control the variety of materials used in plumbing components. When your water has been sitting for several hours, you can minimize the potential for lead exposure by flushing your tap for 30 seconds to two minutes before using water for drinking or cooking. If you are concerned about lead in your drinking water, you may want to consider having your water tested. Information on lead in drinking water, testing methods, and steps you can take to minimize exposure is available from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline
LEAD AND COPPER MEASURED IN THE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (REQUIRED EVERY 3 YEARS)
Contaminant |
|
Action Level (90%) |
|
SWS 2019 |
(90%) |
|
Number over Action Level |
|
Typical Source |
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper |
|
1.3 ppm |
|
0.163 ppm |
|
0 |
|
Corrosion of household plumbing and erosion of |
|
|
|
|
|
natural deposits; Leaching from wood preservatives |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lead |
|
15 ppb |
|
ND |
|
|
1 |
|
Corrosion of household plumbing and |
|
|
|
|
|
erosion of natural deposits |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The LEAD AND COPPER RULE (LCR) protects public health by minimizing lead and copper levels in drinking water, primarily by reducing water corrosivity. Lead and copper enter drinking water mainly from corrosion of lead and copper containing plumbing materials.
Violation Type
Water Quality Parameter (WQP) Level
Violation Begin
07/01/2020
Violation End
12/31/2020
Violation Explanation
Water samples showed that pH levels in certain parts of our water distribution system fell below optimum water quality parameters used to consistently control the natural corrosivity of our drinking water for the period indicated. Optimal water quality parameters are utilized to minimize the potential for lead and copper in our drinking water.
*Spartanburg Water System is taking steps to ensure that pH is maintained within optimal ranges. These steps will include more frequent measurement of pH at additional locations within the water transmission system and enhanced water distribution system monitoring and flushing practices.
REGULATED SUBSTANCES DETECTED IN SWS FINISHED DRINKING WATER/DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
(SAMPLES TAKEN AT THE R.B. SIMMS TREATMENT PLANT, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
Substance |
MCLG |
MCL |
Highest |
Range of |
Date of |
Was MCL |
Typical |
|
Level Found |
Levels Found |
Sample |
Exceeded? |
Source |
||||
|
|
|
||||||
Fluoride * |
4 ppm |
4 ppm |
0.78 ppm |
NA* |
2020 |
No |
Added to prevent tooth decay |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TT = 1 NTU |
0.14 NTU |
0.01 – 0.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turbidity |
NA |
TT = percentage of |
100% |
NA |
2020 |
No |
Soil runoff |
|
|
|
samples equal to or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
below 0.3 NTU |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nitrate |
10 ppm |
10 ppm |
0.11 |
NA |
2020 |
No |
Naturally occurring |
|
and fertilizer runoff |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
TT = removal |
Removal |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Organic Carbon |
NA |
ratio of 1 or |
Ratio Avg. = |
1.00 – 1.44 |
2020 |
No |
Naturally occurring |
|
|
|
greater |
1.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Only fluoride results from samples taken by DHEC are given in the table. Average Fluoride level detected by SWS’s certified laboratory during 2020 was 0.71 ppm for R.B. Simms.
SUBSTANCES MONITORED FOR THE SECONDARY DRINKING WATER STANDARDS
(SAMPLES TAKEN AT THE R.B. SIMMS TREATMENT PLANT)
Substance |
MCLG |
Secondary |
Average |
Range of |
Date of |
Was MCL |
Typical |
||
MCL |
Level Found |
Levels Found |
Sample |
Exceeded? |
Source |
||||
|
|
||||||||
Aluminum |
No M CLG |
50 – 200 ppb |
22 ppb |
11 |
– 58 |
2020 |
No |
Naturally occurring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Chloride |
No M CLG |
250 ppm |
10 ppm |
6 – 13 |
2020 |
No |
Naturally occurring |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Copper |
No MCLG |
1000 ppb |
ND |
ND – 5.3 |
2020 |
No |
Naturally occurring |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Manganese |
No M CLG |
50 ppb |
ND |
ND – 6 |
2020 |
No |
Naturally occurring |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pH |
No MCLG |
6.5 - 8.5 SU |
7.1 SU |
6.8 |
– 7.7 |
2020 |
No |
Naturally occurring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sulfate |
No MCLG |
250 ppm |
14 ppm |
12 |
– 16 |
2020 |
No |
Naturally occurring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Dissolved Solids |
No MCLG |
500 ppm |
37 ppm |
12 |
– 60 |
2020 |
No |
Naturally occurring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Zinc |
No MCLG |
5000 ppb |
58 ppb |
9.5 – 100 |
2020 |
No |
Added for corrosion control |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unregulated Contaminants
Unregulated contaminants are those that do not have a drinking water standard set by EPA. EPA is required by the Safe Drinking Water Act to identify every fve years a list of potential contaminants, make a rule for water systems to test for them, and then make a decision whether regulations is necessary. As part of the Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule 4 (UCMR4), SCDHEC performed testing on Spartanburg Water System for 10 Cyanotoxins and 20 additional contaminants. SCDHEC began testing in 2019 and completed UCMR4 testing in 2020. Assessment Monitoring detected no Cyanotoxins. Seventeen of the contaminants under review were not detected, but three were detected in 2020 and are reported in the table below. The Total Organic Carbon as measured within the source water has been provided in the below table. The average levels measured as well as the range of the levels found are included in this report. If you have any question about these results or are interested in the full list of contaminants that were monitored, please contact Bryan Bates at
UNREGULATED CONTAMINANTS MONITORING RULE 4 (UCMR4)
Substance |
Sample |
Average Level |
Range of |
Date of |
Typical |
|
Location |
Found |
Levels Found |
Sample |
Source |
||
|
||||||
HAA5 |
Distribution System |
19 ppb |
14 – 23 |
2020 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HAA6Br |
Distribution System |
4 ppb |
3 – 4.6 |
2020 |
||
HAA9 |
Distribution System |
23 ppb |
17 – 27 |
2020 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Organic Carbon |
Source Water |
2 ppm |
NA |
2020 |
Naturally Occurring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNREGULATED INORGANIC SUBSTANCES MONITORED
Substance |
|
MCLG |
|
Secondary |
|
Level |
|
Range of |
|
Date of |
|
Was MCL |
|
Typical |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
MCL |
|
Found |
|
Levels Found |
|
Sample |
|
Exceeded? |
|
Source |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sodium |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
8.8 ppm |
|
NA |
|
2020 |
|
No |
|
Naturally occurring |
Nickel |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
0.068 ppm |
|
NA |
|
2020 |
|
No |
|
Erosion of natural deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WATER QUALITY TERMS AND ABBREVIATIONS:
- AL (Action Level): The concentration of a contaminant which, if exceeded, triggers treatment or other requirements that a water system must follow.
- MCL (Maximum Contaminant Level): The highest level of a contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. MCLs are set as close to the MCLGs as feasible using the best available treatment technology.
- MCLG (Maximum Contaminant Level Goal): The level of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MCLGs allow for a margin of safety.
- MRDL (Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level): The highest level of a disinfectant allowed in drinking water. There is convincing evidence that addition of a disinfectant is necessary for control of microbial contaminants.
- MRDLG (Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level Goal): The level of a disinfectant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MRDLGs do not reflect the benefits of the use of disinfectants to control microbial contamination.
- LRAA (Locational Running Annual Average): The average concentration at a particular location for four consecutive quarters.
- NA (Not Applicable): Does not apply.
- ND (Not Detected): Not detected or below detection limits.
- TT (Treatment Technique): A required process intended to reduce the level of a contaminant in drinking water.
OUR MISSION is to provide quality water and wastewater services to our region in a reliable manner.
CUSTOMER SERVICE
Please contact the Spartanburg Water Customer Service Department at
COMMISSION MEETINGS
The Commissioners of Public Works of the City of Spartanburg, SC, meet regularly throughout the year. The meetings are held at: Spartanburg Water Main Offce, 200 Commerce Street, Spartanburg, SC 29306. For more information and a meeting schedule, please contact Trish Heatherington at
OTHER SOURCES OF INFORMATION ON DRINKING WATER
EPA Safe Drinking Water Hotline
National Sanitation Foundation
SCDHEC
ESTE INFORME CONTIENE INFORMACION ACERCA DEL AGUA POTABLE.
Si usted desea recibir una copia de este informe en idioma español, communiqués con Atencion al Cliente at
SPARTANBURG WATER
P.O. Box 251, Spartanburg, SC 29304
Contaminants
Spartanburg Water System
EWG's drinking water quality report shows results of tests conducted by the water utility and provided to the Environmental Working Group by the South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental Control, as well as information from the U.S. EPA Enforcement and Compliance History database (ECHO). For the latest quarter assessed by the U.S. EPA (January 2019 - March 2019), tap water provided by this water utility was in compliance with federal health-based drinking water standards.
Utility details
- Serves: 130929
- Data available: 2012-2017
- Data Source: Surface water
- Total: 15
Contaminants That Exceed Guidelines
- Bromodichloromethane
- Chloroform
- Chromium (hexavalent)
- Dibromochloromethane
- Dichloroacetic acid
- Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)
- Trichloroacetic acid
Other Detected Contaminants
- Chlorate
- Dibromoacetic acid
- Fluoride
- Haloacetic acids (HAA5)
- Monochloroacetic acid
- Nitrate
- Strontium
- Vanadium
Reminder
Always take extra precautions, the water may be safe to drink when it leaves the sewage treatment plant but it may pick up pollutants during its way to your tap. We advise that you ask locals or hotel staff about the water quality. Also, note that different cities have different water mineral contents.
Sources and Resources
Sources Cited
Additional Resources
You''ve probably heard about how polluted our tap water in the United States is. If you don''t know, then you probably should. And if you are a resident of Spartanburg, South Carolina, then you have the right to know more about your local water sources.
You have probably heard that tap water isn''t safe to drink. You probably know that it can cause headaches and even affect your body weight. And what many people may not know is that many types of contaminants can come from your tap. In fact, if you know where to look, you will be surprised at some of the chemicals found in your local water supply. Most of us don''t have a problem with the chemicals found in tap water, but there are some who have serious issues with them.
You will find that chlorine can come from the water when it comes out of your faucet. It is a chemical that is used in order to disinfect water so that it can be used for drinking, cooking, showering, laundry, etc. But because chlorin