Table of Contents
Can You Drink Tap Water in Odessa?
Yes, Odessa's tap water is generally considered safe to drink as Odessa has no active health based violations of the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) that we are aware of. Other factors such as lead piping in a home, or low levels of pollutants on immunocompromised individuals, should also be considered, however. To find more recent info we might have, you can check out our boil water notice page, the city's water provider website, or Odessa's local Twitter account.
According the EPA’s ECHO database, from April 30, 2019 to June 30, 2022, Odessa's water utility, City of St Petersburg, had 0 violations of the Safe Drinking Water Act. For more details on the violations, please see our violation history section below. This assessment is based on the City of St Petersburg water system, other water systems in the city may have different results.
While tap water that meets the EPA health guidelines generally won’t make you sick to your stomach, it can still contain regulated and unregulated contaminants present in trace amounts that could potentially cause health issues over the long-run. These trace contaminants may also impact immunocompromised and vulnerable individuals.
The EPA is reviewing if it’s current regulations around pollutant levels in tap water are strict enough, and the health dangers posed by unregulated pollutants, like PFAS.
Water Quality Report for Odessa Tap Water
The most recent publicly available numbers for measured contaminant levels in Odessa tap water are in its 2020 Water Quality Report. As you can see, there are levels which the EPA considers to be acceptable, but being below the maximum allowable level doesn’t necessarily mean the water is healthy.
Lead in tap water, for example, is currently allowed at up to 15ppb by the EPA, but it has set the ideal goal for lead at zero. This highlights how meeting EPA standards doesn’t necessarily mean local tap water is healthy.
EPA regulations continue to change as it evaluates the long term impacts of chemicals and updates drinking water acceptable levels. The rules around arsenic, as well as, lead and copper are currently being re-evaluated.
There are also a number of "emerging" contaminants that are not currently. For example, PFAS (Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), for which the EPA has issued a health advisory. PFAS are called "forever chemicals" since they tend not to break down in the environment or the human body and can accumulate over time.
We recommend looking at the contaminants present in Odessa's water quality reports, or getting your home's tap water tested to see if you should be filtering your water.
Odessa Tap Water Safe Drinking Water Act Violation History - Prior 10 Years
Below is a ten year history of violations for the water system named City of St Petersburg for Odessa in Florida. For more details please see the "What do these Violations Mean?" section below.
Is there Lead in Odessa Water?
Based on the EPA’s ECHO Database, 90% of the samples taken from the Odessa water system, City of St Petersburg, between sample start date and sample end date, were at or below, 0.0016 mg/L of lead in Odessa water. This is 10.7% of the 0.015 mg/L action level. This means 10% of the samples taken from Odessa contained more lead.
While Odessa water testing may have found 0.0016 mg/L of lead in its water, that does not mean your water source has the same amount. The amount of lead in water in a city can vary greatly from neighborhood to neighborhood, or even building to building. Many buildings, particularly older ones, have lead pipes or service lines which can be a source of contamination. To find out if your home has lead, we recommend getting you water tested.
No amount of lead in water is healthy, only less dangerous. As lead accumulates in our bodies over time, even exposure to relatively small amounts can have negative health effects. For more information, please check out our Lead FAQ page.
Are there PFAS in Odessa Tap Water?
Currently, testing tap water for PFAS isn’t mandated on a national level. We do have a list of military bases where there have been suspected or confirmed leaks. There appears to be at least one military base - Brooksville RC, AASF #2 - near Odessa with suspected leaks.
With many potential sources of PFAS in tap water across the US, the best information we currently have about which cities have PFAS in their water is this ewg map, which you can check to see if Odessa has been evaluated for yet.
Our stance is better safe than sorry, and that it makes sense to try to purify the tap water just in case.
What do these Violations Mean?
Safe Drinking Water Act Violations categories split into two groups, health based, and non-health based. Generally, health based violations are more serious, though non-health based violations can also be cause for concern.
Health Based Violations
- Maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) - maximum allowed contaminant level was exceeded.
- Maximum residual disinfectant levels (MRDLs) - maximum allowed disinfectant level was exceeded.
- Other violations (Other) - the exact required process to reduce the amounts of contaminants in drinking water was not followed.
Non-Health Based Violations
- Monitoring and reporting violations (MR, MON) - failure to conduct the required regular monitoring of drinking water quality, and/or to submit monitoring results on time.
- Public notice violations (Other) - failure to immediately alert consumers if there is a serious problem with their drinking water that may pose a risk to public health.
- Other violations (Other) - miscellaneous violations, such as failure to issue annual consumer confidence reports or maintain required records.
SDWA Table Key
Field | Description |
---|---|
Compliance Period | Dates of the compliance period. |
Status |
Current status of the violation.
|
Health-Based? | Whether the violation is health based. |
Category Code |
The category of violation that is reported.
|
Code | A full description of violation codes can be accessed in the SDWA_REF_CODE_VALUES (CSV) table. |
Contaminant Code | A code value that represents a contaminant for which a public water system has incurred a violation of a primary drinking water regulation. |
Rule Code |
Code for a National Drinking Water rule.
|
Rule Group Code |
Code that uniquely identifies a rule group.
|
Rule Family Code |
Code for rule family.
|
For more clarification please visit the EPA's data dictionary.
Odessa Water - Frequently Asked Questions
By Phone: | 727-893-7261 |
By Mail: | 1650 THIRD AVE. NORTH ST PETERSBURG, FL, 33713 |
Existing customers can login to their City of St Petersburg account to pay their Odessa water bill by clicking here.
If you want to pay your City of St Petersburg bill online and haven't made an account yet, you can create an account online. Please click here to create your account to pay your Odessa water bill.
If you don't want to make an account, or can't remember your account, you can make a one-time payment towards your Odessa water bill without creating an account using a one time payment portal with your account number and credit or debit card. Click here to make a one time payment.
Moving to a new house or apartment in Odessa means you will often need to put the water in your name with City of St Petersburg. In order to put the water in your name, please click the link to the start service form below. Start service requests for water bills typically take two business days.
Leaving your house or apartment in Odessa means you will likely need to take your name off of the water bill with City of St Petersburg. In order to take your name off the water bill, please click the link to the stop service form below. Stop service for water bills requests typically take two business days.
USER SUBMITTED RATINGS
- Drinking Water Pollution and Inaccessibility
- Water Pollution
- Drinking Water Quality and Accessibility
- Water Quality
The above data is comprised of subjective, user submitted opinions about the water quality and pollution in Odessa, measured on a scale from 0% (lowest) to 100% (highest).
Related FAQS
Odessa Water Quality Report (Consumer Confidence Report)
The EPA mandates that towns and cities consistently monitor and test their tap water. They must report their findings in an annual Consumer Confidence Report. Below is the most recent water quality report from Odessa's Water. If you would like to see the original version of the report, please click here.
2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT
This report contains important information about St. Pete’s drinking water. The City of St. Petersburg strives to provide high-quality drinking water that meets or exceeds Federal and State standards.
The City of St. Petersburg Water Resources Department routinely monitors for contaminants in your drinking water according to Federal and State laws, rules and regulations. Except where indicated otherwise, this report is based on the results of our monitoring for the period of January 1 through December 31, 2020.
As authorized and approved by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the State has reduced monitoring requirements for certain contaminants to less often than once per year because the concentrations of these contaminants are not expected to vary significantly from year to year. Some of our data (e.g., for inorganic contaminants), though representative, is more than one year old. This report shows our water quality results, and you will notice that we had no maximum contaminant level (MCL) violations.
Unless otherwise indicated, the data provided in this report are results from testing of treated water from the Cosme Water Treatment Plant. However, if you would like to request a copy of our wholesaler’s annual water quality report, please contact Tampa Bay Water at
This report can be mailed to customers only upon request by calling the Water Resources Department at
PROVIDING
In 2020, about 9.7 billion gallons of water were treated at the Cosme Water Treatment Plant, which is located in northwest Hillsborough County. This treatment includes aeration, lime softening to help with corrosion control, disinfection with chloramines and filtration. Sodium hydroxide is utilized to maintain a stable pH for enhancement of disinfection and corrosion control in the distribution system and fluoride is added to benefit dental health.
OUR DRINKING WATER SOURCES
The City of St. Petersburg is one of six member governments that formed Tampa Bay Water (TBW), the regional water utility which supplies all of our drinking water. The water is a dynamic blend of groundwater, surface water and desalinated water. Groundwater is supplied by six different well fields (TBW controls fourteen well fields in total), pumping water from the Floridan Aquifer. Surface water is drawn from the Alafia River, the Hillsborough River, the C. W. Bill Young Regional Reservoir and the Tampa Bypass Canal. Hillsborough Bay is the primary supply for the Tampa Bay Seawater Desalination facility.
The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) performs source water assessments to provide information about potential sources of contamination to water systems. In 2020, the FDEP performed assessments for Tampa
Bay Water.
The assessment results are available on the FDEP Source Water Assessment and Protection Program website at fldep.dep.state.fl.us/swapp/ or they can be obtained from Tampa Bay Water by calling
SPECIAL PRECAUTIONS
Some people may be more vulnerable to contaminants in drinking water than the general population. Immuno- compromised persons such as persons with cancer undergoing chemotherapy, persons who have undergone organ transplants, people with HIV/AIDS or other immune system disorders, some elderly and infants can be particularly at risk from infections. These people should seek advice about drinking water from their health care providers. Guidelines from the EPA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on appropriate means to lessen the risk of infection
by Cryptosporidium and other microbiological contaminants are available from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline at
LEAD IN DRINKING WATER
In the summer of 2020, the City performed lead and copper testing of tap water collected at residences throughout the City. Results of these analyses indicated very low levels of lead in all the household taps tested. Although these tests indicate that our corrosion control measures are successful in preventing leaching of lead in household plumbing, the EPA would like you to know that, if present, elevated levels of lead can cause serious health problems, especially for pregnant women and young children. Lead in drinking water is primarily from materials and components associated with service lines and home plumbing. The City of St. Petersburg is responsible for providing
UNREGULATED CONTAMINANTS
The City of St. Petersburg has been monitoring for unregulated contaminants (UCs) as part of a study to help the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) determine the occurrence in drinking water of UCs and whether or not these contaminants need to be regulated. At present, no health standards (for example, maximum contaminant levels) have been established for UCs. However, we are required to publish the analytical results of our UC monitoring in our annual water quality report. If you would like more information on the EPA’s Unregulated Contaminants Monitoring Rule, please call the Safe Drinking Water Hotline at
POSSIBLE SOURCES OF DRINKING WATER CONTAMINATION
The sources of drinking water (both tap water and bottled water) include rivers, lakes, streams, ponds, reservoirs, springs and wells. As water travels over the surface of the land or through the ground, it dissolves
Contaminants that may be present in source water include:
- Microbial contaminants, such as viruses and bacteria, which may come from sewage treatment plants, septic systems, agricultural livestock operations and wildlife.
- Inorganic contaminants, such as salts and metals, which may occur naturally or result from urban stormwater runoff, industrial or domestic wastewater discharges, oil and gas production, mining or farming.
- Pesticides and herbicides, which may come from a variety of sources such as agriculture, urban stormwater runoff and residential uses.
-
Organic chemical contaminants, including synthetic and volatile organic chemicals, which are
by-products
of industrial processes and petroleum production, and can also come from gas stations, urban stormwater runoff and septic systems. - Radioactive contaminants, which can be naturally- occurring or be the result of oil and gas production and mining activities.
To ensure that tap water is safe to drink, the EPA prescribes regulations, which limit the amount of certain contaminants in water provided by public water systems. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations establish limits for contaminants in bottled water, which must provide the same protection for public health.
Drinking water, including bottled water, may reasonably be expected to contain at least small amounts of some contaminants. The presence of contaminants does not necessarily indicate that the water poses a health risk. More information about contaminants and potential health effects can be obtained by calling the EPA’s Safe Drinking Water Hotline at
FOR MORE INFORMATION
This report is available online at stpete.org/WaterQuality.
For questions regarding this report: Operations Specialist •
To request a physical copy of this report:
Water Resources Department •
To report leaks or other water quality problems (answered 24 hrs): Water Resources Dept. •
Questions regarding your utility bill: Customer Service •
For questions regarding water treatment: Operations Specialist •
Questions about watering restrictions and conservation: Water Watch Info Line •
To request speakers for your neighborhood association meetings: Water Resources Dept. •
Online drinking water information from EPA: epa.gov/drink
GET INVOLVED
The City of St. Petersburg encourages public interest and participation in our community’s decisions affecting drinking water. The public is welcome at City Council meetings which occur regularly on Thursdays. Find the Council meeting schedule at stpete.org/meetings. Other ways to become involved include contacting elected officials and participating in your neighborhood association.
The following results are the averages of monthly samples taken in 2020.
pH • 8.0 Hardness • 161 mg/L Alkalinity • 120 mg/L Calcium • 55.7 mg/L Magnesium • 5.41 mg/L Sulfate • 54.8 mg/L
INORGANIC CONTAMINANTS
Contaminant and |
Dates of |
MCL Violation |
Level |
Range of |
MCLG |
MCL |
Likely Source of Contamination |
|
Unit of Measurement |
Sampling (mo/yr) |
Y/N |
Detected |
Results |
||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barium (ppm) |
9/20 |
N |
0.0107 |
N/A |
2 |
2 |
Discharge of drilling wastes; discharge from |
|
metal refineries; erosion of natural deposits |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Erosion of natural deposits; discharge from |
|
Fluoride (ppm) |
6/20 |
N |
0.73 |
N/A |
4 |
4.0 |
fertilizer and aluminum factories. Water |
|
additive which promotes strong teeth when |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at the optimum level of 0.7 ppm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nitrate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Runoff from fertilizer use; leaching from |
|
6/20, 11/20 |
N |
0.42 |
0.34 – 0.42 |
10 |
10 |
septic tanks, sewage; erosion of |
||
(as Nitrogen) (ppm) |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
natural deposits |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sodium (ppm) |
6/20, 11/20 |
N |
19.9 |
19.9 - 30.7 |
N/A |
160 |
Salt water intrusion; leaching from soil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DISINFECTANTS AND DISINFECTION BYPRODUCTS
Disinfectant or Contaminant |
Dates of |
MCL or MRDL |
Level Detected |
Range of |
MCLG or |
MCL or |
Likely Source of Contamination |
|
and Unit of Measurement |
Sampling (mo/yr) |
Violation (Y/N) |
Highest RAA |
Results |
MRDLG |
MRDL |
||
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chloramines (ppm) |
1/20 - 12/20 |
N |
3.91 |
0.60 – 6.00 |
MRDLG = |
MRDL = 4.0 |
Water additive used to |
|
4 |
control microbes |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Haloacetic Acids |
1/19, 5/19, |
N |
32.01 |
9.21 - 32.01 |
N/A |
MCL = 60 |
||
(HAA5) (ppb) |
7/19, 10/19 |
water disinfection |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total Trihalomenthanes |
1/19, 4/19, 5/19, |
N |
27.8 |
11.3 - 27.8 |
N/A |
MCL = 80 |
||
(TTHM) (ppb) |
7/19, 10/19 |
water disinfection |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
LEAD AND COPPER (TAP WATER)
Contaminant and |
Dates of |
AL Exceeded |
90th Percentile |
No. of |
|
AL (Action |
|
|
sampling |
MCLG |
Likely Source of Contamination |
||||||
Unit of Measurement |
Sampling (mo/yr) |
(Y/N) |
Result |
sites |
Level) |
|||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
exceeding AL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corrosion of household plumbing systems; |
|
06/20 - 09/20 |
N |
0.38 |
0 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
erosion of natural deposits; leaching from |
||
(Tap water) (ppm) |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
wood preservatives |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lead (Tap water) (ppb) |
06/20 - 09/20 |
N |
1.6 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
Corrosion of household plumbing systems; |
|
erosion of natural deposits |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNREGULATED CONTAMINANTS
Special monitoring to help the EPA to determine where certain contaminants occur and whether the Agency should consider regulating those contaminants in the future
AM1: METALS, PESTICIDES, ALCOHOLS, SVOCs
Contaminant and |
Dates of |
Level Detected |
Range of |
Likely Source of Contamination |
|
Unit of Measurement |
Sampling (mo/yr) |
(Average) |
Results |
||
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manganese (ppb) |
05/19, 8/19, |
|
|
||
1.31 |
ND - 02.50 |
elements and minerals; used in steel production, fertilizer, batteries and fireworks; |
|||
11/19 |
|||||
|
|
|
drinking water and wastewater treatment chemical; essential nutrient |
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
AM2: HAA GROUPS |
|
|
|
||
HAA5 (ppb) |
04/19, 7/19, |
19 |
15 - 27 |
||
10/19 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
||
HAA6Br (ppb) |
04/19, 7/19, |
6.8 |
5.1 - 9.8 |
||
10/19 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
HAA9 (ppb) |
04/19, 7/19, |
25 |
19 - 36 |
||
10/19 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
Overseen by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, the City of St. Petersburg routinely monitors for over 80 drinking water contaminants. If a contaminant was not detected in any of your system’s annual water samples, it will not be included in the contaminant tables. For a full list of contaminants monitored under Chapter
dep.state.fl.us/water/drinkingwater/standard.htm.
RESULTS OF TAMPA BAY WATER MONITORING
MICROBIOLOGICAL CONTAMINANTS
Contaminant and |
|
MCL Violation |
Highest Single |
Lowest monthly % |
|
|
Likely Source of |
|
Dates of Sampling |
of samples meeting |
MCLG |
MCL |
|||||
Unit of Measurement |
(Y/N) |
Measurement |
Contamination |
|||||
|
regulatory limits |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Desal WTP |
N |
0.08 |
100 |
|
|
|
|
Turbidity (NTU) |
1/20, 12/20 |
N/A |
TT |
Soil runoff |
||||
|
|
|
||||||
Surface WTP |
N |
0.122 |
100 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
1/20, 12/20 |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DISINFECTANTS AND DISINFECTION BYPRODUCTS
Disinfectant or |
|
MCL Violation |
|
|
MCLG or |
MCL or |
Likely Source of |
|
Contaminant and |
Dates of Sampling |
Level Detected |
Range of Results |
|||||
(Y/N) |
MRDLG |
MRDL |
Contamination |
|||||
Unit of Measurement |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bromate (ppb) |
Surface WTP |
N |
3.04 Highest |
ND – 5.66 |
MCLG = 0 |
MCL = |
||
1/20 - 12/20 |
RAA |
10 |
water disinfection |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
Acute Violations |
Level Detected |
MRDLG = |
MDRL = |
Water additive used to |
||
Chlorine Dioxide (ppb) |
Desal WTP 4/19* |
(Y/N) |
Violations (Y/N) |
|||||
0.50 |
800 |
800 |
control microbes |
|||||
|
|
N |
N |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Highest |
Highest Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
MCL Violation |
following an MCL |
|
|
|
||
|
Desal WTP |
Monthly |
MCLG = |
MCL = |
||||
Chlorite (ppm) |
(Y/N) |
exceedance at the |
||||||
1/20 - 12/20 |
Average |
0.8 |
1.0 |
water disinfection |
||||
|
N |
ETDS |
||||||
|
|
0.00559 |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Desal WTP |
TT Violations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/20 - 6/20, |
LRAAMRR |
RANGE OF MRR |
|
|
|
||
Total Organic |
(Y/N) |
N/A |
TT |
Naturally present in |
||||
12/20 |
3.37 |
|||||||
Carbon ratio |
N |
N/A |
TT |
the environment |
||||
Surface WTP |
2.24 |
|||||||
|
N |
|
|
|
||||
|
1/20 - 12/20 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Chlorine Dioxide not used at the Desal WTP in 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
DISINFECTION
Disinfectant or Contaminant |
Dates of |
MCL Violation |
Level Detected |
Range of |
MCLG or |
MCL or |
Likely Source of Contamination |
|
and Unit of Measurement |
Sampling (mo/yr) |
(Y/N) |
Results |
MRDLG |
MRDL |
|||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Desal WTP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/20, 4/20, 7/20, |
|
14.18 Highest |
|
|
|
|
|
HAA5 (ppb) |
10/20, 12/20 |
N |
LRAA |
N/A |
60 |
|||
Surface WTP |
14.18 Highest |
disinfection |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
1/20, 4/20, 7/20, |
|
LRAA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10/20, 12/20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Desal WTP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/20, 4/20, 7/20, |
|
20.69 Highest |
|
|
|
|
|
TTHM (ppb) |
10/20, 12/20 |
N |
LRAA |
N/A |
80 |
|||
Surface WTP |
N |
20.69 Lowest |
water disinfection |
|||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
1/20, 4/20, 7/20, |
|
LRAA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10/20, 12/20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
RADIOACTIVE CONTAMINANTS
Compound and Unit |
Dates of |
MCL Violation |
Highest Single |
Range of |
MCLG |
MCL |
Likely Source of Contamination |
|
of Measurement |
Sampling (mo/yr) |
(Y/N) |
Measurement |
Results |
||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alpha Emitters (pCi/L) |
Desal WTP 4/20 |
N |
1.3 |
N/A |
0 |
15 |
Erosion of natural deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INORGANIC CONTAMINANTS
Compound and Unit of |
Dates of Sampling |
MCL Violation |
Level |
Range of |
MCLG or |
MCL or |
Likely Source of Contamination |
|
Measurement |
(mo/yr) |
Y/N |
Detected |
Results |
MRDLG |
MDRL |
||
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Desal 4/20 |
N |
0.110 |
N/A |
|
|
Erosion of natural deposits; runoff |
|
Arsenic (ppb) |
0 |
10 |
from orchards; runoff of glass and |
|||||
Surface WTP 4/20 |
N |
0.230 |
N/A |
|||||
|
|
|
electronic production wastes |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Desal 4/20 |
N |
0.004 |
N/A |
|
|
Discharge of drilling waste; discharge |
|
Barium (ppm) |
2 |
2 |
from metal refineries; erosion of |
|||||
Surface WTP 4/20 |
N |
0.007 |
N/A |
|||||
|
|
|
natural deposits |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sodium (ppm) |
Desal 4/20 |
N |
60.5 |
N |
160 |
N/A |
Salt Water Intrusion; |
|
Surface WTP 4/20 |
N |
22.8 |
N |
leaching from soil |
||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Erosion of natural deposits; |
|
|
Surface WTP |
|
|
|
|
|
discharge from fertilizer and |
|
Fluoride (ppm) |
N |
0.567 |
N/A |
4 |
4 |
aluminum factories. Water additive |
||
4/20 |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
which promotes strong teeth when at |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the optimum level of 0.7 ppm. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Surface WTP |
|
|
|
|
|
esidue from |
|
Lead (point of entry) (ppb) |
1/20, 4/20, 7/20, |
N |
4 |
ND – 4 |
15 |
0 |
as auto emissions and paint; lead |
|
|
10/20 |
|
|
|
|
|
pipe, casing, and solder. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Surface WTP |
|
|
|
|
|
Pollution from mining and |
|
Nickel (ppb) |
N |
3 |
N/A |
100 |
N/A |
refining operations. Natural |
||
4/20 |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
occurrence in soil. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Surface WTP |
|
|
0.209- |
|
|
Runoff from fertilizer use; leaching |
|
Nitrate (as Nitrogen) (ppm) |
1/20, 4/20, 7/20, |
N |
0.395 |
10 |
10 |
from septic tanks, sewage; |
||
0.395 |
||||||||
|
10/20 |
|
|
|
|
erosion of natural deposits. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LEGEND
AL or Action Level • The concentration of a contaminant which, if exceeded, triggers treatment or other requirements that a water system must follow.
ETDS • Entrance to the distribution system.
LRAAMRR • Lowest running annual average, compiled quarterly, of monthly removal ratios.
MCL or Maximum Contaminant Level • The highest level of a contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. MCLs are set as close to the MCLGs as feasible using the best available treatment technology.
MCLG or Maximum Contaminant Level Goal • The level of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MCLGs allow for a margin of safety. MRDL or Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level • The highest level of a disinfectant allowed in drinking water. There is convincing evidence that addition of a disinfectant is necessary for control of microbial contaminants.
MRDLG or Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level Goal • The level of a drinking water disinfectant below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MRDLGs do not reflect the benefits of the use of disinfectants to control microbial contaminants.
MRR • Monthly removal ratios.
N/A • not applicable.
ND • Means not detected and indicates that the substance was not found by laboratory analysis.
NTU (Nephelometric Turbidity Unit) • Turbidity is a measure of the cloudiness of the water. Turbidity in excess of 5 NTU is just noticeable to the average person. It is monitored it because it is a good indicator of the effectiveness of filtration systems. High turbidity can hinder the effectiveness of disinfectants.
PPB (Parts Per Billion) or μg/L (Micrograms Per Liter) • one part by weight of analyte to 1 billion parts by weight of the water sample.
PPM (Parts Per Million) or mg/L (Milligrams Per Liter) • one part by weight of analyte to 1 million parts by weight of the water sample.
RAA – Running annual average (computed quarterly) of monthly averages.
- or Treatment Technique • A required process intended to reduce the level of a contaminant in drinking water.
Water Resources Department 1650 3rd Ave. N. stpete.org/waterquality
Contaminants
City of St. Petersburg
EWG's drinking water quality report shows results of tests conducted by the water utility and provided to the Environmental Working Group by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, as well as information from the U.S. EPA Enforcement and Compliance History database (ECHO). For the latest quarter assessed by the U.S. EPA (January 2019 - March 2019), tap water provided by this water utility was in compliance with federal health-based drinking water standards.
Utility details
- Serves: 300075
- Data available: 2012-2017
- Data Source: Purchased surface water
- Total: 13
Contaminants That Exceed Guidelines
- Arsenic
- Chromium (hexavalent)
- Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)
Other Detected Contaminants
- Aluminum
- Barium
- Chlorate
- Chromium (total)
- Cyanide
- Fluoride
- Haloacetic acids (HAA5)
- Nitrate
- Strontium
- Vanadium
Reminder
Always take extra precautions, the water may be safe to drink when it leaves the sewage treatment plant but it may pick up pollutants during its way to your tap. We advise that you ask locals or hotel staff about the water quality. Also, note that different cities have different water mineral contents.