Table of Contents
Can You Drink Tap Water in Florence?
Yes, Florence's tap water is generally considered safe to drink as Florence has no active health based violations of the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) that we are aware of. Other factors such as lead piping in a home, or low levels of pollutants on immunocompromised individuals, should also be considered, however. To find more recent info we might have, you can check out our boil water notice page or the city's water provider website.
According the EPA’s ECHO database, from April 30, 2019 to June 30, 2022, Florence's water utility, Florence Water-Wastewater Department, had 0 violations of the Safe Drinking Water Act. For more details on the violations, please see our violation history section below. This assessment is based on the Florence Water-Wastewater Department water system, other water systems in the city may have different results.
While tap water that meets the EPA health guidelines generally won’t make you sick to your stomach, it can still contain regulated and unregulated contaminants present in trace amounts that could potentially cause health issues over the long-run. These trace contaminants may also impact immunocompromised and vulnerable individuals.
The EPA is reviewing if it’s current regulations around pollutant levels in tap water are strict enough, and the health dangers posed by unregulated pollutants, like PFAS.
Water Quality Report for Florence Tap Water
The most recent publicly available numbers for measured contaminant levels in Florence tap water are in its 2020 Water Quality Report. As you can see, there are levels which the EPA considers to be acceptable, but being below the maximum allowable level doesn’t necessarily mean the water is healthy.
Lead in tap water, for example, is currently allowed at up to 15ppb by the EPA, but it has set the ideal goal for lead at zero. This highlights how meeting EPA standards doesn’t necessarily mean local tap water is healthy.
EPA regulations continue to change as it evaluates the long term impacts of chemicals and updates drinking water acceptable levels. The rules around arsenic, as well as, lead and copper are currently being re-evaluated.
There are also a number of "emerging" contaminants that are not currently. For example, PFAS (Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), for which the EPA has issued a health advisory. PFAS are called "forever chemicals" since they tend not to break down in the environment or the human body and can accumulate over time.
We recommend looking at the contaminants present in Florence's water quality reports, or getting your home's tap water tested to see if you should be filtering your water.
Florence Tap Water Safe Drinking Water Act Violation History - Prior 10 Years
Below is a ten year history of violations for the water system named Florence Water-Wastewater Department for Florence in Alabama. For more details please see the "What do these Violations Mean?" section below.
Is there Lead in Florence Water?
Based on the EPA’s ECHO Database, 90% of the samples taken from the Florence water system, Florence Water-Wastewater Department, between sample start date and sample end date, were at or below, 0.0037 mg/L of lead in Florence water. This is 24.7% of the 0.015 mg/L action level. This means 10% of the samples taken from Florence contained more lead.
While Florence water testing may have found 0.0037 mg/L of lead in its water, that does not mean your water source has the same amount. The amount of lead in water in a city can vary greatly from neighborhood to neighborhood, or even building to building. Many buildings, particularly older ones, have lead pipes or service lines which can be a source of contamination. To find out if your home has lead, we recommend getting you water tested.
No amount of lead in water is healthy, only less dangerous. As lead accumulates in our bodies over time, even exposure to relatively small amounts can have negative health effects. For more information, please check out our Lead FAQ page.
Are there PFAS in Florence Tap Water?
Currently, testing tap water for PFAS isn’t mandated on a national level. We do have a list of military bases where there have been suspected or confirmed leaks. There appears to be no military bases near Florence with suspected leaks.
With many potential sources of PFAS in tap water across the US, the best information we currently have about which cities have PFAS in their water is this ewg map, which you can check to see if Florence has been evaluated for yet.
Our stance is better safe than sorry, and that it makes sense to try to purify the tap water just in case.
What do these Violations Mean?
Safe Drinking Water Act Violations categories split into two groups, health based, and non-health based. Generally, health based violations are more serious, though non-health based violations can also be cause for concern.
Health Based Violations
- Maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) - maximum allowed contaminant level was exceeded.
- Maximum residual disinfectant levels (MRDLs) - maximum allowed disinfectant level was exceeded.
- Other violations (Other) - the exact required process to reduce the amounts of contaminants in drinking water was not followed.
Non-Health Based Violations
- Monitoring and reporting violations (MR, MON) - failure to conduct the required regular monitoring of drinking water quality, and/or to submit monitoring results on time.
- Public notice violations (Other) - failure to immediately alert consumers if there is a serious problem with their drinking water that may pose a risk to public health.
- Other violations (Other) - miscellaneous violations, such as failure to issue annual consumer confidence reports or maintain required records.
SDWA Table Key
Field | Description |
---|---|
Compliance Period | Dates of the compliance period. |
Status |
Current status of the violation.
|
Health-Based? | Whether the violation is health based. |
Category Code |
The category of violation that is reported.
|
Code | A full description of violation codes can be accessed in the SDWA_REF_CODE_VALUES (CSV) table. |
Contaminant Code | A code value that represents a contaminant for which a public water system has incurred a violation of a primary drinking water regulation. |
Rule Code |
Code for a National Drinking Water rule.
|
Rule Group Code |
Code that uniquely identifies a rule group.
|
Rule Family Code |
Code for rule family.
|
For more clarification please visit the EPA's data dictionary.
What do people in Florence think about the tap water?
Despite the Florentine enthusiasm for consuming bottled mineral water with meals, tap water in the city is perfectly drinkable.
Florence Water - Frequently Asked Questions
By Phone: | 256-760-6637 |
By Mail: | P O BOX 1023 FLORENCE, AL, 35631 |
Existing customers can login to their Florence Water-Wastewater Department account to pay their Florence water bill by clicking here.
If you want to pay your Florence Water-Wastewater Department bill online and haven't made an account yet, you can create an account online. Please click here to create your account to pay your Florence water bill.
If you don't want to make an account, or can't remember your account, you can make a one-time payment towards your Florence water bill without creating an account using a one time payment portal with your account number and credit or debit card. Click here to make a one time payment.
Moving to a new house or apartment in Florence means you will often need to put the water in your name with Florence Water-Wastewater Department. In order to put the water in your name, please click the link to the start service form below. Start service requests for water bills typically take two business days.
Leaving your house or apartment in Florence means you will likely need to take your name off of the water bill with Florence Water-Wastewater Department. In order to take your name off the water bill, please click the link to the stop service form below. Stop service for water bills requests typically take two business days.
The estimated price of bottled water
$0.48 in USD (1.5-liter)
USER SUBMITTED RATINGS
- Drinking Water Pollution and Inaccessibility
- Water Pollution
- Drinking Water Quality and Accessibility
- Water Quality
The above data is comprised of subjective, user submitted opinions about the water quality and pollution in Florence, measured on a scale from 0% (lowest) to 100% (highest).
Related FAQS
Florence Water Quality Report (Consumer Confidence Report)
The EPA mandates that towns and cities consistently monitor and test their tap water. They must report their findings in an annual Consumer Confidence Report. Below is the most recent water quality report from Florence's Water. If you would like to see the original version of the report, please click here.
T H E C I T Y O F F L O R E N C E
WAT E R D E PA R T M E N T
2021 Annual
Water Quality
Report
The City of Florence Water/ Wastewater Department is pleased to provide you, our customer, our annual Water Quality Report. The City of Florence Water Department is committed to providing the residents of Florence and Lauderdale County with the safest and highest quality drinking water possible. Daily testing is done at our treatment facilities using sophisticated equipment and the most advanced procedures, and the water produced by the City of Florence Water Department meets or surpasses
both state and federal standards for both appearance and safety. This annual “Water Quality Report”, which is required by the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), tells you where your water comes from, what tests by independent laboratories show about it, and other information you should know about your drinking water.
But, most importantly:
The City of Florence’s drinking water met or surpassed all federal and state drinking water standards during 2020.
For information about how you can participate in decisions or for general information about your drinking water, call us at (256)
Overview
The City of Florence’s drinking water is supplied by surface water from the Tennessee River and Cypress Creek. Modern, state of the art surface water treatment facilities using the most up to date technology treats the water from these two sources. In addition, we pump ground water from two wells in the Killen and Center Star areas of Lauderdale County, which is blended with the treated surface water sources. The well sources supply these areas only in Killen.
The City of Florence utilizes coagulation, flocculation, sedimentation and filtration in their treatment process. Also, chlorine is used for disinfection, fluoride for dental protection, and lime for pH treatment.
New Treatment Process added in 2014
The MIEX system was added as a simple solution for meeting U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) disinfection
What do these tables mean?
It’s easy! Our water is tested to assure that it is safe and healthy. The Table of Primary Contaminants provides an overview of some primary contaminants that are known to pose a health risk to humans. In the Table of Detected Contaminants, the column marked Amount Detected shows the highest test results during the year. Sources of Contaminant Level show where this substance usually originates. The Table of Secondary Contaminants lists regulated contaminants that my cause cosmetic or aesthetic effects in drinking water. Columns headed MCL and MCLG refer to:
Action Level: the concentration of a contaminant that triggers treatment or other requirements which a water system must follow.
Maximum Contaminant Level or MCL: The highest level of a contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. MCLs are set as close to the MCLGs as feasible using the best available technology.
Maximum Contaminant Level Goal or MCLG: The level of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MCLGs allow for a margin of safety.
Tables of Primary Contaminants
|
Amount |
Contaminant |
MCL Detected |
|
|
Bacteriological
Total Coliform Bacteria |
< 5% |
5% |
Turbidity |
TT |
.21 |
Fecal Coliform and E. Coli |
0 |
0 |
Fecal Indicators (enterococci or coliphage) |
TT |
0 |
|
Amount |
Contaminant |
MCL Detected |
|
|
Radiological
Beta/photon emitters (mrem/yr) |
4 |
ND |
Alpha emitters (pCi/l) |
15 |
ND |
Combined radium (pCi/l) |
5 |
ND |
Uranium |
30 |
ND |
|
Amount |
Contaminant |
MCL Detected |
|
|
Inorganic
Antimony |
.006 |
ND |
Arsenic |
.01 |
ND |
Asbestos (MFL) |
7 |
ND |
Barium |
2 |
0.024 |
Beryllium |
.004 |
ND |
Bromate |
.010 |
ND |
Cadmium |
.005 |
ND |
Chloramines |
4 |
ND |
Chlorine |
4 |
1.6 |
Chlorine Dioxide |
.8 |
ND |
Chlorite |
1 |
ND |
Chromium |
.1 |
ND |
Copper |
1.3 |
0.10 |
Cyanide |
.2 |
ND |
Fluoride |
4 |
.73 |
Lead |
.015 |
*0.0035 |
Mercury |
.002 |
ND |
Nitrate |
10 |
.73 |
Nitrite |
1 |
ND |
Total Nitrate and Nitrite |
10 |
ND |
Selenium |
.05 |
ND |
Thallium |
.002 |
ND |
At high levels some primary contaminants are known to pose a health risks to humans. These tables provides a quick glance of any primary contaminant detections.
|
Amount |
|
Amount |
Contaminant |
MCL Detected |
Contaminant |
MCL Detected |
|
|
|
|
Organic Chemicals |
|
Ethylbenzene |
|
|
.7 |
ND |
|||||
Acrylamide |
|
TT |
ND |
Ethylene dibromide |
|
.00005 |
ND |
||||
|
Glyphosate |
|
|
.7 |
ND |
||||||
Alachlor |
|
|
.002 |
ND |
|
|
|||||
|
|
HAA5 |
|
|
60 |
15.0 |
|
||||
Atrazine |
|
|
.003 |
ND |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Heptachlor |
|
|
.0004 |
ND |
|||||
Benzene |
|
|
.005 |
ND |
|
|
|||||
|
|
Heptachlor epoxide |
|
.0002 |
ND |
||||||
Benzo(a)pyrene[PAHs] |
|
.0002 |
ND |
|
|||||||
|
Hexachlorobenzene |
|
.001 |
ND |
|||||||
Carbofuran |
|
.04 |
ND |
|
|||||||
|
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene |
.05 |
ND |
||||||||
Carbon Tetrachloride |
|
.005 |
ND |
||||||||
|
Lindane |
|
|
.0002 |
ND |
||||||
Chlordane |
|
.002 |
ND |
|
|
||||||
|
Methoxychlor |
|
|
.04 |
ND |
||||||
Chlorobenzene |
|
.1 |
ND |
|
|
||||||
|
Oxamyl [Vydate] |
|
.2 |
ND |
|||||||
|
|
.070 |
ND |
|
|||||||
|
|
Pentachlorophenol |
|
.001 |
ND |
||||||
Dalapon |
|
|
.2 |
ND |
|
||||||
|
|
Picloram |
|
|
.5 |
ND |
|||||
Dibromochloropropane |
|
.0002 |
ND |
|
|
||||||
|
Polychlorinated biphenyls PCBs |
.0005 |
ND |
||||||||
|
.6 |
ND |
|||||||||
|
Simazine |
|
|
.004 |
ND |
||||||
|
.075 |
ND |
|
|
|||||||
|
Styrene |
|
|
.1 |
ND |
||||||
|
.005 |
ND |
|
|
|||||||
|
Tetrachloroethylene |
|
.005 |
ND |
|||||||
|
.007 |
ND |
|
||||||||
|
Toluene |
|
|
1 |
ND |
||||||
|
.07 |
ND |
|
|
|||||||
|
TOC |
|
|
TT |
2.13 |
|
|||||
.1 |
ND |
|
|
|
|||||||
TTHM |
|
|
80 |
26.6 |
|
||||||
Dichloromethane |
|
.005 |
ND |
|
|
|
|||||
|
Toxaphene |
|
|
.003 |
ND |
||||||
|
.005 |
ND |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
.05 |
ND |
||||||||
|
.4 |
ND |
|
||||||||
|
.07 |
ND |
|||||||||
|
.006 |
ND |
|||||||||
|
.2 |
ND |
|||||||||
Dinoseb |
|
|
.007 |
ND |
|||||||
|
|
.005 |
ND |
||||||||
.00000003 |
ND |
||||||||||
Trichloroethylene |
|
.005 |
ND |
||||||||
Diquat |
|
|
.02 |
ND |
|
||||||
|
|
Vinyl Chloride |
|
|
.002 |
ND |
|||||
Endothall |
|
|
.1 |
ND |
|
|
|||||
|
|
Xylenes |
|
|
10 |
ND |
|||||
Endrin |
|
|
.002 |
ND |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Epichlorohydrin |
|
TT |
ND |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
*Florence Water Department had 1 Lead sample test result over the Action Level. |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
A resample was taken at the same site and that result was within the limits. |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Key to Tables |
|
ND |
= Not Detected |
TT |
= Treatment Technique, a |
|
|||||
AL = |
Action Level |
|
|
||||||||
MCL = |
Maximum |
|
pci/l = picocuries per liter (a |
|
required process intend- |
|
|||||
|
|
ed to reduce the level of |
|
||||||||
|
Contaminant Level |
|
measure of radioactivity) |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
a contaminant in drink- |
|
|||||||
MCLG = Maximum |
|
ppm = parts per million, milli- |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
ing water. |
|
|
|||||||
|
Contaminant Level |
|
grams pr liter (mg/l) |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Goal |
|
ppb = parts per billion, micro- |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
NTU = |
Nephelometric |
|
|
grams per liter (ug/l) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Turbidity Units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table of Secondary Contaminants
|
|
|
Amount |
Contaminant |
MCL |
Unit |
Detected |
Alkalinity, Total |
NA |
ppm |
70.2 |
Aluminum |
0.20 |
ppm |
0.073 |
Calcium |
NA |
ppm |
21.7 |
Carbon Dioxide |
NA |
ppm |
6.6 |
Chloride |
250 |
ppm |
45.9 |
Color |
15.0 |
units |
5.0 |
Surfactants (MBAs) |
0.50 |
ppm |
ND |
Hardness |
NA |
ppm |
70.3 |
Iron |
0.30 |
ppm |
ND |
Magnesium |
NA |
ppm |
3.9 |
Manganese |
0.05 |
ppm |
0.0077 |
Table of Detected Contaminants |
|
Contaminant |
MCLG |
MCL |
Range |
|
Bacteriological — 01/01/2020 - 12/31/2020 |
|
|
|
|
Total Coliform Bacteria |
0 |
<5% |
|
|
Turbidity |
0 |
TT |
0.01 |
- 0.21 |
Inorganic Chemicals — 01/01/2020 - 12/31/2020 |
|
|
||
Chlorine |
4 |
4 |
.2 |
- 1.6 |
Fluoride |
4 |
4 |
0.0 |
|
Nitrate |
10 |
10 |
0.0 |
- 0.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Contaminant |
MCL |
Unit |
Detected |
|
|
|
Nickel |
.01 |
ppm |
|
ND |
|
Odor |
3.0 |
threshold odor number |
ND |
|||
pH |
NA |
ppm |
|
7.4 |
|
|
Silver |
0.10 |
ppm |
|
ND |
||
Sodium, as Na |
NA |
ppm |
|
19.2 |
|
|
Sulfate |
500 |
ppm |
|
10.1 |
|
|
Specific Conductance |
|
umhos/cm |
|
239 |
|
|
Total Dissolved Solids |
500 |
ppm |
|
146 |
|
|
Zinc |
5.0 |
ppm |
|
ND |
||
Langelier Index |
NA |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
Likely Sources of |
||
Violation |
Detected |
Contaminant(s) |
||
No |
5% |
Present |
Naturally present in the environment |
|
|
or Absent |
|
||
|
|
|
||
No |
0.21 NTU |
Soil runoff |
||
|
|
|
||
|
1.6 ppm |
Disinfection |
||
No |
.73 ppm |
Erosion of natural deposits; water additive which |
||
promotes strong teeth; discharge from fertilizer |
||||
|
|
|
||
No |
.73 ppm |
and aluminum factories |
||
Runoff from fertilizer use; leaching from septic |
||||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
tanks, sewage; erosion of natural deposits |
Organic Chemicals — 01/01/2020 - 12/31/2020
HAA5 |
NA |
60 |
TOC |
NA |
TT |
TTHM |
NA |
80 |
8.9 – 30.00
.5 - 1.1
12.0 - 53.0
No
No
No
- ppb 1.1 ppb
- ppb
Naturally present in the environment
Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR4) - 2020 Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Contaminant |
Units |
Detected |
Contaminant |
Units |
Detected |
|
|
ppb |
ND |
Manganese |
ppb |
4.00 |
|
|
|
Chlorpyrifos |
ppb |
ND |
Bromide |
ppb |
28.5 |
|
|
Dimethipin |
ppb |
ND |
Total Organic Carbon |
ppb |
2140 |
|
|
Ethoprop |
ppb |
ND |
Bromochloroacetic Acid |
ppb |
4.7 |
|
|
ppb |
ND |
Bromodichloroacetic Acid |
ppb |
2.2 |
|
|
|
Oxyfluorfen |
ppb |
ND |
Chlorodibromoacetic Acid |
ppb |
0.86 |
|
|
Permethrin |
ppb |
ND |
Dibromoacetic Acid |
ppb |
1.7 |
|
|
Profenofos |
ppb |
ND |
Dichloroacedtic Acid |
ppb |
16.3 |
|
|
Tebuconazole |
ppb |
ND |
HAA9 Group |
ppb |
34.4 |
|
|
Butylated Hydroxyanisole |
ppb |
ND |
Total Brominated HAAs |
ppb |
10.1 |
|
|
Quinoline |
ppb |
ND |
Haloacetic Acids (Total) |
ppb |
32.00 |
|
|
ppb |
ND |
Monobromoacetic Acid |
ppb |
1.1 |
|
|
|
ppb |
ND |
Monochloroacetic Acid |
ppb |
ND |
||
|
ppb |
ND |
Tribromoacetic Acid |
ppb |
1.7 |
|
|
|
ppb |
ND |
Trichloroacetic Acid |
ppb |
16.6 |
|
|
|
Germanium |
ppb |
ND |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This year’s report features images of brass nozzles.
Photography is by L. Wray Dillard.
|
CRYPTOSPORIDIUM & GIARDIA Cryptosporidium and Giardia are microscopic |
|
Table of |
|||||||
|
organisms found in surface water throughout the United States. Although filtration |
|
||||||||
|
removes Cryptosporidium and Giardia, the most |
|
|
Florence Water Department tested for the following |
|
|||||
|
cannot guarantee 100 percent removal. Ingestion of may cause an abdominal infection. |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
substances in 2018 but none were detected. |
|
||||||
|
Symptoms of infection include nausea, diarrhea and abdominal cramps. Most |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
healthy individuals can overcome the disease within a few weeks. However, immuno- |
|
|
|
||||||
|
compromised individuals, infants and small children, and the elderly are at greater risk |
|
|
Bromobenzene |
|
|||||
|
of developing |
|
|
Bromochloromethane |
|
|||||
|
to consult their doctor regarding appropriate precautions to take to avoid infection. |
|
|
Bromoform |
|
|||||
|
Cryptosporidium and Giardia must be ingested to cause disease, and it may be spread |
|
|
Bromomethane |
Hexachlorobutadiene |
|
||||
|
through means other than drinking water. Cryptosporidium and Giardia in at Florence’s |
|
|
Isoprpylbenzene |
|
|||||
|
treatment plants are removed and/or treated by effective filtration and disinfection |
|
|
|
||||||
|
processes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Methylene Chloride |
|
|
|
We monitored the untreated source waters for both Cryptosporidium and Giardia in |
|
|
Chloroethane |
Methyl |
|
||||
|
|
|
Chloromethane |
Naphthalene |
|
|||||
|
2017. The results are below: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dibromomethane |
|
|||
|
Date |
Analysis Results |
Analysis Results |
|
|
|
||||
|
Analyzed |
Cypress Creek |
Wilson Lake |
|
|
1,2 |
Tetrachloroethene |
|
||
|
|
|
1,3 |
Trichlorfluoromethane |
|
|||||
|
Cryptosporidium |
Giardia |
Cryptosporidium Giardia |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
1,4 - Dichlorobenzene |
Trichloroethene |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
01/2017 |
0.20 organisms/L |
0.27 organisms/L |
0.27 organisms/L |
0.00 organisms/L |
|
|
Dichlorodifluoromethane |
|
|
|
02/2017 |
0.00 organisms/L |
1.60 organisms/L |
0.00 organisms/L |
0.00 organisms/L |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
03/2017 |
0.48 organisms/L |
1.80 organisms/L |
070 organisms/L |
0.00 organisms/L |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
04/2017 |
0.10 organisms/L |
0.29 organisms/L |
0.98 organisms/L |
0.00 organisms/L |
|
be viewed in the Water Department office between the hours of 8:00 am to 5:00 pm, |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
05/2017 |
0.00 organisms/L |
0.39 organisms/L |
0.27 organisms/L |
0.00 organisms/L |
|
Monday through Friday. Appointments for reviewing are recommended. |
|||
|
06/2017 |
0.00 organisms/L |
0.67 organisms/L |
0.27 organisms/L |
0.00 organisms/L |
|
Required Additional Health Information |
|||
|
07/2017 |
0.00 organisms/L |
1.00 organisms/L |
0.10 organisms/L |
0.00 organisms/L |
|
To ensure that tap water is safe to drink, EPA prescribes limits on the amount of certain |
|||
|
08/2017 |
0.00 organisms/L |
0.19 organisms/L |
0.00 organisms/L |
0.00 organisms/L |
|
contaminants in water provided by public water systems. FDA regulations establish limits |
|||
|
|
for contaminants in bottled water. |
|
|
||||||
|
09/2017 |
0.00 organisms/L |
0.19 organisms/L |
0.00 organisms/L |
0.00 organisms/L |
|
Drinking water, including bottled water, may reasonably be expected to contain at least |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
small amounts of some contaminants. The presence of contaminants does not necessarily |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
LEAD AND COPPER RULE MONITORING Lead and copper Rule (LCR) was |
|
indicate that water poses a health risk. More information about contaminants and |
|||||||
|
|
potential health effects can be obtained by calling the Environmental Protection Agency’s |
||||||||
|
developed to protect public health by minimizing lead and copper levels in drinking |
|
||||||||
|
|
Safe Drinking Water Hotline |
|
|
||||||
|
water. The LCR established an action level of 0.015 mg/l for lead and 1.3 mg/l for |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
copper based on the 90th percentile level of tap water samples collected. Lead and |
|
The sources of drinking water (both tap water and bottled water) include rivers, lakes, |
|||||||
|
copper are sampled on a mandated |
|
streams, ponds, reservoirs, springs, and wells. As water travels over the surface of the land |
|||||||
|
at customer’s tap. Our 90th percentile for lead was 0.0035 mg/L. Our 90th percentile |
|
or through the ground, it dissolves naturally occurring minerals and radioactive material, |
|||||||
|
for copper was 0.10 mg/L. |
|
|
|
|
and can pick up substances resulting from the presence of animals or from human activity. |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contaminants that may be present in source water include: |
|||
|
LEAD If present, elevated levels of lead can cause serious health problems, especially |
|
((A) Microbiological contaminants, such as viruses and bacteria, which may come from |
|||||||
|
for pregnant women and young children. Lead in drinking water is primarily from |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
sewage treatment plants, septic systems, agricultural livestock operations, and |
|||||||
|
materials and components associated with service lines and home plumbing. The |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
wildlife. |
|
|
|||||
|
City of Florence Water Department is responsible for providing high quality drinking |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
(B) Inorganic contaminants, such as salts and metals, which can be natural occurring or |
||||||||
|
water, but cannot control the variety of materials used in plumbing components. When |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
result from urban storm runoff, industrial or domestic wastewater discharges, oil and |
|||||||
|
your water has been sitting for several hours, you can minimize the potential for lead |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
gas production, mining, or farming. |
|
|
|||||
|
exposure by flushing your tap for 30 seconds to 2 minutes before using water for |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
drinking or cooking. If you are concerned about lead in your water, you may wish to |
|
(C) Pesticides and herbicides, which may come from a variety of sources such as |
|||||||
|
have your water tested. Information on lead in drinking water, testing methods and |
|
|
agricultural, storm water runoff, and residential uses. |
||||||
|
steps you can take to minimize exposure is available from the Safe Drinking Water |
|
(D) Organic chemical contaminants, including synthetic and volatile organics, which are |
|||||||
|
Hotline or at |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
from gas stations, urban storm water runoff and septic systems. |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
UNREGULATED CONTAMINANTS Radon is not a concern in water that comes from |
|
(E) Radioactive contaminants, which can be naturally occurring or be the result of oil |
|||||||
|
|
|
and gas production and mining activities. In order to ensure that tap water is safe |
|||||||
|
lakes, rivers, and reservoirs (called surface water), because the radon is released into |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
to drink, EPA prescribes regulations, which limit the amount of certain contaminants |
|||||||
|
the air before it arrives at your tap. The City of Florence is not required to test for radon, |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
in water provided by public water systems. FDA regulations establish limits for |
|||||||
|
and there is currently no |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
contaminants in bottled water, which must provide the same protection for public |
|||||||
|
there are other unregulated contaminants that were tested for in 2020 which can be |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
health. |
|
|
|||||
|
found in this annual report. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Some people may be more vulnerable to contaminants in drinking water |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
ASBESTOS and DIOXIN Based on a study conducted by ADEM with the approval of |
|
than is the general population. |
|||||||
|
the EPA, a statewide waiver for the monitoring of asbestos and dioxin was issued. Thus |
|
as persons with cancer undergoing chemotherapy, persons who have |
|||||||
|
monitoring for these contaminants is not required. |
|
|
|
undergone organ transplants, people with HIV/AIDS or other immune |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
system disorders, some elderly, and infants can be particularly at risk from |
|||
|
SOURCE WATER ASSESSMENTS The City of Florence Water Department has |
|
infections. These people should seek advice about drinking water from |
|||||||
|
performed source water assessments for the Wilson Lake Treatment Plant located |
|
their health care providers. EPA/CDC guidelines on appropriate means to |
|||||||
|
on the Wilson Lake (Tennessee River) and the Cypress Creek Treatment Plant located |
|
lessen the risk of infection by Cryptosporidium are available from the Safe |
|||||||
|
on Cypress Creek. In addition, assessments have been completed for Peck Lane and |
|
Drinking Water Hotline |
|
|
Houston Hill’s wells located in the Killen and Center Star areas. This information may2021 Annual Water Quality Report
National Primary Drinking Water
Regulation Compliance
This 2021 Annual Water Quality Report was prepared by Michael Doyle and Gina Hall of the City of Florence Water/Wastewater Department using technical assistance and guidance from the American Water Works Association (AWWA), the National Rural Water Association (NRWA), United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), and the Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM).
We will be pleased to answer any questions about the City of Florence Water Department and our water quality. Call our offices at (256)
Learn more about the City of Florence Water Department water system at…
https://florenceal.org/utilities/ |
florence_gas_&_water_depart- |
ment/. |
2021 Annual Water Quality Report
City of Florence, Alabama |
PRSRT STD |
U.S. POSTAGE PAID |
|
P.O. Box 1023, Florence, AL 35631 |
FLORENCE, AL |
Florence Water/Wastewater Department |
PERMIT NO. 152 |
|
2021 Annual Water Quality Report
Contaminants
Florence Water-Wastewater Department
EWG's drinking water quality report shows results of tests conducted by the water utility and provided to the Environmental Working Group by the Alabama Department of Environmental Management, as well as information from the U.S. EPA Enforcement and Compliance History database (ECHO). For the latest quarter assessed by the U.S. EPA (January 2019 - March 2019), tap water provided by this water utility was in compliance with federal health-based drinking water standards.
Utility details
- Serves: 66900
- Data available: 2012-2017
- Data Source: Surface water
- Total: 17
Contaminants That Exceed Guidelines
- Bromodichloromethane
- Chloroform
- Chromium (hexavalent)
- Dibromochloromethane
- Nitrate
- Nitrate and nitrite
- Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS)
- Radium%2C combined (-226 & -228)
- Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)
Other Detected Contaminants
- 1%2C4-Dioxane
- Aluminum
- Chlorate
- Fluoride
- Haloacetic acids (HAA5)
- Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
- Strontium
- Vanadium
Reminder
Always take extra precautions, the water may be safe to drink when it leaves the sewage treatment plant but it may pick up pollutants during its way to your tap. We advise that you ask locals or hotel staff about the water quality. Also, note that different cities have different water mineral contents.