Table of Contents
Can You Drink Tap Water in Chandler?
Yes, Chandler's tap water is generally considered safe to drink as Chandler has no active health based violations of the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) that we are aware of. Other factors such as lead piping in a home, or low levels of pollutants on immunocompromised individuals, should also be considered, however. To find more recent info we might have, you can check out our boil water notice page or the city's water provider website.
According the EPA’s ECHO database, from April 30, 2019 to June 30, 2022, Chandler's water utility, City of Chandler, had 0 violations of the Safe Drinking Water Act. For more details on the violations, please see our violation history section below. The last violation for Chandler was resolved on Dec. 31, 2020. This assessment is based on the City of Chandler water system, other water systems in the city may have different results.
While tap water that meets the EPA health guidelines generally won’t make you sick to your stomach, it can still contain regulated and unregulated contaminants present in trace amounts that could potentially cause health issues over the long-run. These trace contaminants may also impact immunocompromised and vulnerable individuals.
The EPA is reviewing if it’s current regulations around pollutant levels in tap water are strict enough, and the health dangers posed by unregulated pollutants, like PFAS.
Water Quality Report for Chandler Tap Water
The most recent publicly available numbers for measured contaminant levels in Chandler tap water are in its 2020 Water Quality Report. As you can see, there are levels which the EPA considers to be acceptable, but being below the maximum allowable level doesn’t necessarily mean the water is healthy.
Lead in tap water, for example, is currently allowed at up to 15ppb by the EPA, but it has set the ideal goal for lead at zero. This highlights how meeting EPA standards doesn’t necessarily mean local tap water is healthy.
EPA regulations continue to change as it evaluates the long term impacts of chemicals and updates drinking water acceptable levels. The rules around arsenic, as well as, lead and copper are currently being re-evaluated.
There are also a number of "emerging" contaminants that are not currently. For example, PFAS (Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), for which the EPA has issued a health advisory. PFAS are called "forever chemicals" since they tend not to break down in the environment or the human body and can accumulate over time.
We recommend looking at the contaminants present in Chandler's water quality reports, or getting your home's tap water tested to see if you should be filtering your water.
Chandler Tap Water Safe Drinking Water Act Violation History - Prior 10 Years
Below is a ten year history of violations for the water system named City of Chandler for Chandler in Arizona. For more details please see the "What do these Violations Mean?" section below.
From April 1, 2019 to June 30, 2019, Chandler had 1 health-based Safe Drinking Water Act violation with the violation category being Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, more specifically, the violation code was Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average which falls into the Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule rule code group, and the Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule rule code family for the following contaminant code: TTHM.
From Oct. 1, 2018 to Oct. 31, 2018, Chandler had 1 non-health based Safe Drinking Water Act violation with the violation category being Monitoring and Reporting, more specifically, the violation code was Monitoring of Treatment (SWTR-Filter) which falls into the Microbials rule code group, and the Surface Water Treatment Rules rule code family for the following contaminant code: Surface Water Treatment Rule.
From Oct. 1, 2018 to Dec. 31, 2018, Chandler had 1 non-health based Safe Drinking Water Act violation with the violation category being Monitoring and Reporting, more specifically, the violation code was Monitoring, Regular which falls into the Chemicals rule code group, and the Synthetic Organic Chemicals rule code family for the following contaminant code: Dalapon.
From Jan. 1, 2018 to Dec. 31, 2018, Chandler had 21 non-health based Safe Drinking Water Act violations with the violation category being Monitoring and Reporting, more specifically, the violation code was Monitoring, Regular which falls into the Chemicals rule code group, and the Volatile Organic Chemicals rule code family for the following contaminant codes: 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene, cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene, Xylenes, Total, o-Dichlorobenzene, Vinyl chloride, 1,1-Dichloroethylene, trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene, 1,1,1-Trichloroethane, 1,2-Dichloropropane, 1,1,2-Trichloroethane, Tetrachloroethylene, CHLOROBENZENE, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, Styrene, p-Dichlorobenzene, Benzene, Trichloroethylene, DICHLOROMETHANE, 1,2-Dichloroethane, Carbon tetrachloride.
From Jan. 1, 2018 to Dec. 31, 2020, Chandler had 3 non-health based Safe Drinking Water Act violations with the violation category being Monitoring and Reporting, more specifically, the violation code was Monitoring, Regular which falls into the Chemicals rule code group, and the Synthetic Organic Chemicals rule code family for the following contaminant codes: Chlordane, Dalapon, Toxaphene.
From July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018, Chandler had 20 non-health based Safe Drinking Water Act violations with the violation category being Monitoring and Reporting, more specifically, the violation code was Monitoring, Regular which falls into the Chemicals rule code group, and the Volatile Organic Chemicals rule code family for the following contaminant codes: Tetrachloroethylene, 1,1,1-Trichloroethane, DICHLOROMETHANE, Benzene, Ethylbenzene, Toluene, Carbon tetrachloride, 1,2-Dichloroethane, CHLOROBENZENE, 1,2-Dichloropropane, 1,1-Dichloroethylene, cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene, trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene, Styrene, 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene, 1,1,2-Trichloroethane, p-Dichlorobenzene, Trichloroethylene, Xylenes, Total, o-Dichlorobenzene.
From July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018, Chandler had 10 non-health based Safe Drinking Water Act violations with the violation category being Monitoring and Reporting, more specifically, the violation code was Monitoring, Regular which falls into the Chemicals rule code group, and the Radionuclides rule code family for the following contaminant codes: Combined Uranium, Radium-226, Radium-228, Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon and U, Combined Uranium, Combined Radium (-226 and -228), Radium-226, Radium-228, Combined Radium (-226 and -228), Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon and U.
From Jan. 1, 2017 to Dec. 31, 2017, Chandler had 1 non-health based Safe Drinking Water Act violation with the violation category being Monitoring and Reporting, more specifically, the violation code was Monitoring, Regular which falls into the Chemicals rule code group, and the Inorganic Chemicals rule code family for the following contaminant code: Nitrate.
From May 1, 2013 to May 31, 2013, Chandler had 1 non-health based Safe Drinking Water Act violation with the violation category being Monitoring and Reporting, more specifically, the violation code was Monitoring, Routine Minor (TCR) which falls into the Microbials rule code group, and the Total Coliform Rules rule code family for the following contaminant code: Coliform (TCR).
Is there Lead in Chandler Water?
Based on the EPA’s ECHO Database, 90% of the samples taken from the Chandler water system, City of Chandler, between sample start date and sample end date, were at or below, 0.0025 mg/L of lead in Chandler water. This is 16.7% of the 0.015 mg/L action level. This means 10% of the samples taken from Chandler contained more lead.
While Chandler water testing may have found 0.0025 mg/L of lead in its water, that does not mean your water source has the same amount. The amount of lead in water in a city can vary greatly from neighborhood to neighborhood, or even building to building. Many buildings, particularly older ones, have lead pipes or service lines which can be a source of contamination. To find out if your home has lead, we recommend getting you water tested.
No amount of lead in water is healthy, only less dangerous. As lead accumulates in our bodies over time, even exposure to relatively small amounts can have negative health effects. For more information, please check out our Lead FAQ page.
Are there PFAS in Chandler Tap Water?
Currently, testing tap water for PFAS isn’t mandated on a national level. We do have a list of military bases where there have been suspected or confirmed leaks. There appears to be at least one military base - Williams AFB - near Chandler with suspected leaks.
With many potential sources of PFAS in tap water across the US, the best information we currently have about which cities have PFAS in their water is this ewg map, which you can check to see if Chandler has been evaluated for yet.
Our stance is better safe than sorry, and that it makes sense to try to purify the tap water just in case.
Chandler SDWA Violation History Table - Prior 10 Years
Compliance Period | Status | Health-Based? | Category Code | Code | Rule Code | Contaminant Code | Rule Group Code | Rule Family Code |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
04/01/2019 - 06/30/2019 | Resolved | Yes | Maximum Contaminant Level Violation (MCL) | Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average (02) | Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule (220) | TTHM (2950) | Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule (200) | Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule (220) |
10/01/2018 - 10/31/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring of Treatment (SWTR-Filter) (36) | Surface Water Treatment Rule (121) | Surface Water Treatment Rule (0200) | Microbials (100) | Surface Water Treatment Rules (120) |
10/01/2018 - 12/31/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Synthetic Organic Chemicals (320) | Dalapon (2031) | Chemicals (300) | Synthetic Organic Chemicals (320) |
01/01/2018 - 12/31/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) | 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene (2378) | Chemicals (300) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) |
01/01/2018 - 12/31/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) | cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene (2380) | Chemicals (300) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) |
01/01/2018 - 12/31/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) | Xylenes, Total (2955) | Chemicals (300) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) |
01/01/2018 - 12/31/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) | o-Dichlorobenzene (2968) | Chemicals (300) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) |
01/01/2018 - 12/31/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) | Vinyl chloride (2976) | Chemicals (300) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) |
01/01/2018 - 12/31/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) | 1,1-Dichloroethylene (2977) | Chemicals (300) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) |
01/01/2018 - 12/31/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) | trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene (2979) | Chemicals (300) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) |
01/01/2018 - 12/31/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) | 1,1,1-Trichloroethane (2981) | Chemicals (300) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) |
01/01/2018 - 12/31/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) | 1,2-Dichloropropane (2983) | Chemicals (300) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) |
01/01/2018 - 12/31/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) | 1,1,2-Trichloroethane (2985) | Chemicals (300) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) |
01/01/2018 - 12/31/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) | Tetrachloroethylene (2987) | Chemicals (300) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) |
01/01/2018 - 12/31/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) | CHLOROBENZENE (2989) | Chemicals (300) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) |
01/01/2018 - 12/31/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) | Toluene (2991) | Chemicals (300) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) |
01/01/2018 - 12/31/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) | Ethylbenzene (2992) | Chemicals (300) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) |
01/01/2018 - 12/31/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) | Styrene (2996) | Chemicals (300) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) |
01/01/2018 - 12/31/2020 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Synthetic Organic Chemicals (320) | Chlordane (2959) | Chemicals (300) | Synthetic Organic Chemicals (320) |
01/01/2018 - 12/31/2020 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Synthetic Organic Chemicals (320) | Dalapon (2031) | Chemicals (300) | Synthetic Organic Chemicals (320) |
01/01/2018 - 12/31/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) | p-Dichlorobenzene (2969) | Chemicals (300) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) |
01/01/2018 - 12/31/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) | Benzene (2990) | Chemicals (300) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) |
01/01/2018 - 12/31/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) | Trichloroethylene (2984) | Chemicals (300) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) |
01/01/2018 - 12/31/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) | DICHLOROMETHANE (2964) | Chemicals (300) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) |
01/01/2018 - 12/31/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) | 1,2-Dichloroethane (2980) | Chemicals (300) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) |
01/01/2018 - 12/31/2020 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Synthetic Organic Chemicals (320) | Toxaphene (2020) | Chemicals (300) | Synthetic Organic Chemicals (320) |
01/01/2018 - 12/31/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) | Carbon tetrachloride (2982) | Chemicals (300) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) |
07/01/2017 - 06/30/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) | Tetrachloroethylene (2987) | Chemicals (300) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) |
07/01/2017 - 06/30/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) | 1,1,1-Trichloroethane (2981) | Chemicals (300) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) |
07/01/2017 - 06/30/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) | DICHLOROMETHANE (2964) | Chemicals (300) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) |
07/01/2017 - 06/30/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) | Benzene (2990) | Chemicals (300) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) |
07/01/2017 - 06/30/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) | Ethylbenzene (2992) | Chemicals (300) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) |
07/01/2017 - 06/30/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) | Toluene (2991) | Chemicals (300) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) |
07/01/2017 - 06/30/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) | Carbon tetrachloride (2982) | Chemicals (300) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) |
07/01/2017 - 06/30/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) | 1,2-Dichloroethane (2980) | Chemicals (300) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) |
07/01/2017 - 06/30/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) | CHLOROBENZENE (2989) | Chemicals (300) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) |
07/01/2017 - 06/30/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Radionuclides (340) | Combined Uranium (4006) | Chemicals (300) | Radionuclides (340) |
07/01/2017 - 06/30/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Radionuclides (340) | Radium-226 (4020) | Chemicals (300) | Radionuclides (340) |
07/01/2017 - 06/30/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Radionuclides (340) | Radium-228 (4030) | Chemicals (300) | Radionuclides (340) |
07/01/2017 - 06/30/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) | 1,2-Dichloropropane (2983) | Chemicals (300) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) |
07/01/2017 - 06/30/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) | 1,1-Dichloroethylene (2977) | Chemicals (300) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) |
07/01/2017 - 06/30/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) | cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene (2380) | Chemicals (300) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) |
07/01/2017 - 06/30/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) | trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene (2979) | Chemicals (300) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) |
07/01/2017 - 06/30/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) | Styrene (2996) | Chemicals (300) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) |
07/01/2017 - 06/30/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) | 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene (2378) | Chemicals (300) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) |
07/01/2017 - 06/30/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Radionuclides (340) | Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon and U (4000) | Chemicals (300) | Radionuclides (340) |
07/01/2017 - 06/30/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Radionuclides (340) | Combined Uranium (4006) | Chemicals (300) | Radionuclides (340) |
07/01/2017 - 06/30/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Radionuclides (340) | Combined Radium (-226 and -228) (4010) | Chemicals (300) | Radionuclides (340) |
07/01/2017 - 06/30/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Radionuclides (340) | Radium-226 (4020) | Chemicals (300) | Radionuclides (340) |
07/01/2017 - 06/30/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Radionuclides (340) | Radium-228 (4030) | Chemicals (300) | Radionuclides (340) |
07/01/2017 - 06/30/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) | 1,1,2-Trichloroethane (2985) | Chemicals (300) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) |
07/01/2017 - 06/30/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) | p-Dichlorobenzene (2969) | Chemicals (300) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) |
07/01/2017 - 06/30/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) | Trichloroethylene (2984) | Chemicals (300) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) |
07/01/2017 - 06/30/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) | Xylenes, Total (2955) | Chemicals (300) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) |
07/01/2017 - 06/30/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) | o-Dichlorobenzene (2968) | Chemicals (300) | Volatile Organic Chemicals (310) |
07/01/2017 - 06/30/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Radionuclides (340) | Combined Radium (-226 and -228) (4010) | Chemicals (300) | Radionuclides (340) |
07/01/2017 - 06/30/2018 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Radionuclides (340) | Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon and U (4000) | Chemicals (300) | Radionuclides (340) |
01/01/2017 - 12/31/2017 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Regular (03) | Nitrates (331) | Nitrate (1040) | Chemicals (300) | Inorganic Chemicals (330) |
05/01/2013 - 05/31/2013 | Resolved | No | Monitoring and Reporting (MR) | Monitoring, Routine Minor (TCR) (24) | Total Coliform Rule (110) | Coliform (TCR) (3100) | Microbials (100) | Total Coliform Rules (110) |
What do these Violations Mean?
Safe Drinking Water Act Violations categories split into two groups, health based, and non-health based. Generally, health based violations are more serious, though non-health based violations can also be cause for concern.
Health Based Violations
- Maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) - maximum allowed contaminant level was exceeded.
- Maximum residual disinfectant levels (MRDLs) - maximum allowed disinfectant level was exceeded.
- Other violations (Other) - the exact required process to reduce the amounts of contaminants in drinking water was not followed.
Non-Health Based Violations
- Monitoring and reporting violations (MR, MON) - failure to conduct the required regular monitoring of drinking water quality, and/or to submit monitoring results on time.
- Public notice violations (Other) - failure to immediately alert consumers if there is a serious problem with their drinking water that may pose a risk to public health.
- Other violations (Other) - miscellaneous violations, such as failure to issue annual consumer confidence reports or maintain required records.
SDWA Table Key
Field | Description |
---|---|
Compliance Period | Dates of the compliance period. |
Status |
Current status of the violation.
|
Health-Based? | Whether the violation is health based. |
Category Code |
The category of violation that is reported.
|
Code | A full description of violation codes can be accessed in the SDWA_REF_CODE_VALUES (CSV) table. |
Contaminant Code | A code value that represents a contaminant for which a public water system has incurred a violation of a primary drinking water regulation. |
Rule Code |
Code for a National Drinking Water rule.
|
Rule Group Code |
Code that uniquely identifies a rule group.
|
Rule Family Code |
Code for rule family.
|
For more clarification please visit the EPA's data dictionary.
Chandler Water - Frequently Asked Questions
By Phone: | 480-782-3730 |
By Email: | lori.mccallum@chandleraz.gov |
By Mail: | PO BOX 4008 CHANDLER, AZ, 85244-4008 |
Existing customers can login to their City of Chandler account to pay their Chandler water bill by clicking here.
If you want to pay your City of Chandler bill online and haven't made an account yet, you can create an account online. Please click here to create your account to pay your Chandler water bill.
If you don't want to make an account, or can't remember your account, you can make a one-time payment towards your Chandler water bill without creating an account using a one time payment portal with your account number and credit or debit card. Click here to make a one time payment.
Moving to a new house or apartment in Chandler means you will often need to put the water in your name with City of Chandler. In order to put the water in your name, please click the link to the start service form below. Start service requests for water bills typically take two business days.
Leaving your house or apartment in Chandler means you will likely need to take your name off of the water bill with City of Chandler. In order to take your name off the water bill, please click the link to the stop service form below. Stop service for water bills requests typically take two business days.
The estimated price of bottled water
$1.67 in USD (1.5-liter)
USER SUBMITTED RATINGS
- Drinking Water Pollution and Inaccessibility
- Water Pollution
- Drinking Water Quality and Accessibility
- Water Quality
The above data is comprised of subjective, user submitted opinions about the water quality and pollution in Chandler, measured on a scale from 0% (lowest) to 100% (highest).
Related FAQS
Chandler Water Quality Report (Consumer Confidence Report)
The EPA mandates that towns and cities consistently monitor and test their tap water. They must report their findings in an annual Consumer Confidence Report. Below is the most recent water quality report from Chandler's Water. If you would like to see the original version of the report, please click here.
City of Chandler
2020 DRINKING WATER QUALITY CONSUMER CONFIDENCE REPORT
Public Water System AZ04-07-090
.bien entienda lo que alguien con hable ó Tradúzcalo .beber agua su sobre importante muy información contiene informe Este
4008 Box .O.P
803 Stop Mail
Quality Water
Utilities & Works Public
The City of Chandler Public
Works & Utilities Department is committed to providing a safe and sustainable supply of drinking water for our val- ued customers. Due to our strong commitment, the City of Chandler employs a team of chemists, technicians, and specialists to collect and per-
form more tests on the water served than is required by law. This report provides valuable material concerning your drink- ing water including information about its sources, results from water quality testing, and how to interpret the data provided.
About your Water Supply
The drinking water supplied by the City of Chandler to its cus- tomers comes from three sources:
- The Chandler Surface Water Treatment Plant (SWTP) treats and distributes water from the Salt River, Verde River, Central Arizona Project (Colorado River), and Salt River Project (SRP) wells whose water is transported to Chandler via the Consolidated Canal.
- 32 active wells supply groundwater from aquifers underlying Chandler. Groundwater is disinfected with chlorine prior to being introduced into the City’s distribution system.
-
The City of Chandler and the Town of Gilbert jointly own the Santan Vista Water Treatment Plant (SVWTP) located in the Town of Gilbert. This facility currently treats and distributes up to 24 million gallons per day of Colorado River water from the Central Arizona Project to each city. We have included compliance information supplied by the SVWTP. The Town of Gilbert’s annual Water Quality Report can also be accessed at
www.gilbertaz.gov/departments/public-works/water/reports.
City of Chandler Water Supply Statistics
• 23.3 billion gallons of drinking water were supplied to Chandler water users in 2020. (A daily average of 64 million gallons.)
• Chandler’s SWTP produced 13 billion gallons, or 56% of the City’s total drinking water.
• Groundwater |
wells produced 5.2 |
|
|
56% Chandler WPT |
|
|
|||
billion gallons, |
or 22% of the City’s |
|
|
22% Wells |
|
total drinking water. |
22% Santan WTP |
|
- The SVWTP supplied 5.2 billion gallons, or 22% of the City’s total drinking water.
Drinking Water and your Health
Drinking water, including bottled water, may reasonably be expected to contain at least small amounts of some contami- nants. The presence of contaminants does not necessarily indi- cate that water poses a health risk. Some people may be more vulnerable to contaminants in drinking water than the general population.
For more information about contaminants and potential health effects, or to receive a copy of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines on appropriate means to lessen the risk of infection by Cryptosporidium and microbiological contaminants call the
EPA Safe Drinking Water Hotline at
The sources of drinking water (both tap and bottled water) include rivers, lakes, streams, ponds, reservoirs, springs, and wells. As water travels over the surface of the land or through the ground, it dissolves
- Microbial Contaminants: Such as viruses and bacteria that may come from sewage treatment plants, septic systems, agricultural livestock operations, and wildlife
-
Inorganic Contaminants: Such as salts and metals that can be
naturally-occurring or result from urban storm water run- off, industrial or domestic wastewater discharges, oil and gas production, mining, or farming - Pesticides and Herbicides: Such as agriculture, urban storm water runoff, and residential uses that may come from a vari- ety of sources
-
Organic Chemical Contaminants: Such as synthetic and volatile organic chemicals, which are
by-products of industrial processes and petroleum production, and also may come from gas stations, urban storm water runoff, and septic sys- tems - Radioactive contaminants: That can be naturally occurring or be the result of oil and gas production and mining activi- ties.
In order to ensure tap water is safe to drink, the EPA prescribes regulations limiting the amount of certain contaminants in water provided by public water systems. The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations establish limits for contaminants in bottled water providing the same level of protection for public health. Information on these regulations may be obtained by calling
Chandler Detected Regulated Contaminants 2018, 2019 and 2020
|
MCL |
Highest Level |
Range of All |
|
|
Sample |
|
|
Radionuclides |
Violation |
Samples |
MCL |
MCLG |
Month & |
Likely Source of Contamination |
||
Detected |
||||||||
|
Y or N |
|
|
|
Year |
|
||
Alpha Emitters (pCi/L) |
N |
2.3 |
< 1.0 - 2.3 |
15 |
0 |
1/2019 |
Erosion of natural deposits |
|
Combined Radium |
N |
0.8 |
< 0.6 – 0.8 |
5 |
0 |
10/2018 |
Erosion of natural deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Uranium (ug/L) |
N |
6.9 |
<0.8 – 6.9 |
30 |
0 |
7/2020 |
Erosion of natural deposits |
|
|
MCL |
Running Annual |
Range of All |
|
|
Sample |
|
|
Inorganic Chemicals |
Average (RAA) |
|
|
|
||||
Violation |
Samples |
MCL |
MCLG |
Month & |
Likely Source of Contamination |
|||
(IOC) |
OR Highest Level |
|||||||
|
Y or N |
Detected |
|
|
Year |
|
||
Antimony (ppb) |
N |
1.2 |
<1.0 – 1.2 |
6 |
6 |
1/2020 |
Discharge from petroleum refineries; fire retardants; ceramics, |
|
electronics and solder |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Arsenic1 (ppb) |
N |
9.4 |
<1.0 – 9.4 |
10 |
0 |
1/2020 |
Erosion of natural deposits, runoff from orchards, runoff from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
glass and electronics production wastes |
|
Barium (ppm) |
N |
0.17 |
0.02 - 0.17 |
2 |
2 |
1/2020 |
Discharge of drilling wastes; discharge from metal refineries; |
|
Erosion of natural deposits |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Chromium (ppb) |
N |
24 |
< 1.0 - 24 |
100 |
100 |
1/2020 |
Discharge from steel and pulp mills; Erosion of natural deposits |
|
Fluoride (ppm) |
N |
1.4 |
0.22 - 1.4 |
4 |
4 |
1/2020 |
Erosion of natural deposits; water additive which promotes strong |
|
teeth; discharge from fertilizer and aluminum factories |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Nitrate2 (ppm) |
N |
6.9 |
< 0.05– 6.9 |
10 |
10 |
10/2020 |
Runoff from fertilizer use; leaching from septic tanks, sewage; ero- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sion of natural deposits |
|
Selenium (ppb) |
N |
4.5 |
<0.5 – 4.5 |
50 |
50 |
3/2018 |
Discharge from petroleum and metal refineries; erosion of natural |
|
deposits; discharge from mines |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Sodium (ppm) |
NA |
270 |
92 – 270 |
N/A |
N/A |
1/2020 |
Erosion of natural deposits |
- is a mineral known to cause cancer in humans at high concentration and is linked to other health effects, such as skin damage and circulatory problems. If arsenic is less than or equal to the MCL, your drinking water meets EPA’s standards. EPA’s standard balances the current understanding of arsenic’s possible health effects against the costs of removing arsenic from drinking water, and continues to research the health effects of low levels of arsenic.
- in drinking water at levels above 10 ppm is a health risk for infants of less than six months of age. High nitrate levels in drinking water can cause “blue baby syndrome.” Nitrate levels may rise quickly for short periods of time because of rainfall or agricultural activity. If you are caring for an infant, and detected nitrate levels are above 5 ppm, you should ask advice from your health care provider.
Synthetic Organic |
MCL |
Highest Level |
|
Range of All |
|
|
|
|
Sample |
|
|
|
Violation |
|
Samples |
|
MCL |
|
MCLG |
Month & |
Likely Source of Contamination |
||||
Chemicals (SOC) |
Detected |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Y or N |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
|
|
N |
0.34 |
|
|
< 0.1 – 0.34 |
|
70 |
|
70 |
1/2019 |
Runoff from herbicide used on row crops |
||
Dalapon (ppb) |
N |
2.1 |
|
|
< 1.0 – 2.1 |
|
200 |
|
200 |
4/2019 |
Runoff from herbicide used on rights of way |
|
Di |
N |
1.4 |
|
|
< 0.58 – 1.4 |
|
6 |
|
0 |
10/2018 |
Discharge from rubber and chemical factories |
|
phthalate (ppb) |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Surface Water Monitoring 2020: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TT |
|
|
RAA Range |
|
Sample |
||||
Surface Water Treatment Rule |
|
Violation |
Lowest RAA |
TT |
Month & Likely Source of Contamination |
|||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
Y or N |
|
|
|
Year |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Total Organic Carbon1 Removal Ratio |
N |
1.09 |
|
|
>1 RAA |
10/2020 Naturally present in the environment |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
Highest Level |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Detected |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turbidity2 (NTU) |
|
|
N |
0.28 |
|
100% |
|
|
>95% |
10/2020 Soil runoff |
|
- Total organic carbon (TOC) has no health effects. However, total organic carbon provides a medium for the formation of disinfection byproducts. These byproducts include trihalomethanes (THM) and haloacetic acids (HAA). Drinking water containing these byproducts in excess of the MCL may lead to adverse health effects, liver, or kidney problems, or nervous system effects, and may lead to an increased risk of getting cancer.
-
Turbidity is a measure of the cloudiness of water and is an indication of the effectiveness of our filtration system. We monitor it because it is a good indicator of the quality of water. High turbidity can hinder the effectiveness of disinfectants. Turbidity has no health effects. However, turbidity can interfere with disinfection and provide a medium for microbial growth. Turbidity may indicate the presence of
disease-causing organisms. These organisms include bacteria, viruses, and parasites that can cause symptoms such as nausea, cramps, diarrhea, and associated headaches.
Distribution System Detections 2020:
|
MCL |
Running Annual Average |
Range of All |
|
|
Sample |
|
|
Disinfectants |
Violation |
Samples |
MRDL |
MRDLG |
Month & |
Likely Source of Contamination |
||
(RAA) |
||||||||
|
Y or N |
|
|
|
Year |
|
||
Chlorine (ppm) |
N |
0.89 |
0.09 - 1.98 |
4 |
0 |
1/2020 |
Water additive used to control microbes |
|
Disinfection |
MCL |
Running Annual Average |
Range of All |
|
|
Sample |
|
|
Violation |
(RAA) OR Highest Level |
Samples |
MCL |
MCLG |
Month & |
Likely Source of Contamination |
||
Y or |
Detected |
|
|
Year |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Haloacetic Acids |
N |
31.7 |
<1 - 52 |
60 |
N/A |
10/2020 |
Byproduct of drinking water disinfection |
|
(HAA5)1 (ppb) |
0 |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Total Trihalomethanes |
N |
67.25 |
1.4 - 120 |
80 |
N/A |
1/2020 |
Byproduct of drinking water disinfection |
|
(TTHM)2 (ppb) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1Total Trihalomethanes (TTHMs) Some people who drink water containing trihalomethanes in excess of the MCL over many years may experience problems with their liver, kidneys, or central nervous systems, and may have an increased risk of getting cancer.
2Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) Some people who drink water containing haloacetic acids in excess of the MCL over many years may have an increased risk of getting cancer.
Lead and Copper Testing
Federal regulations require all cities to test for lead and cop- per at selected customer’s taps at least once every three years. The City of Chandler conducted lead and copper tap sampling in the summer of 2019, with the concentrations of lead and copper well below regulatory limits. The next round of lead and copper sampling will be in 2022.
Lead, in drinking water, is primarily from materials and components associated with service lines and home plumb- ing. If present, elevated levels of lead can cause serious health problems, especially for pregnant women and young
Lead and Copper Study 2019:
children. The City of Chandler is responsible for providing high quality drinking water, but cannot control the variety of materials used in household plumbing components. When your water has been sitting for several hours, you can mini- mize the potential for lead exposure by flushing your tap for 30 seconds to 2 minutes before using water for drinking or cooking. Information on lead in drinking water, testing meth- ods, and steps you can take to minimize exposure is available from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline
|
MCL |
|
Number of |
|
|
Sample Month |
|
|
Lead & Copper |
Violation |
90th Percentile |
Samples |
AL |
ALG |
Likely Source of Contamination |
||
& Year |
||||||||
|
Y or N |
|
Exceeds AL |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Copper (ppm) |
N |
0.16 |
0 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
9/2019 |
Corrosion of household plumbing systems; |
|
erosion of natural deposits |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Lead (ppb) |
N |
2.5 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
9/2019 |
Corrosion of household plumbing systems; |
|
erosion of natural deposits |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Regulation
The 1996 amendments to the Safe Drinking Water Act required the EPA to establish criteria for a program to moni- tor unregulated contaminants and publish a list of up to 30 contaminants to be monitored every five years. The intent of this rule is to provide baseline occurrence data that the
Detected Unregulated Contaminant (UCMR4):
EPA can combine with the toxicological research to make decisions about potential future drinking water regulations. The EPA published the final rule for the Fourth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Regulation Cycle (UCMR4) to meet this requirement in the Federal Register on December 20, 2016; Chandler’s assigned sampling period began in July 2018 and continued through July 2019. As of the end of testing, 23 of the 30 compounds were not detected in our system.
|
Detected |
|
Range of All |
|
|
|
Contaminant |
Average |
Samples |
MRL |
Likely Source of Contamination |
||
(Y/N) |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
||
Germanium (ppb) |
Y |
0.314 |
< 0.3 – 0.84 |
0.3 |
||
and minerals; a byproduct of zinc ore processing; used in infrared optics, |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
systems, electronics and solar applications |
|
Manganese (ppb) |
Y |
4.177 |
<0.4 – 170 |
0.4 |
||
and minerals; used in steel production, fertilizer, batteries and fireworks; drinking water |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
and wastewater treatment chemical; essential nutrient |
|
Y |
0.005 |
<0.007 – 0.016 |
0.007 |
Used in the production of dyes, rubber, pharmaceuticals and pesticides |
||
HAA6Br (ppb) |
Y |
18.42 |
0.73 - 44 |
0.2 |
||
HAA9 (ppb) |
Y |
36.46 |
0.73 - 100 |
0.2 |
||
Total Organic Carbon (ppm) |
Y |
3.3 |
2.2 - 4.5 |
0.3 |
Naturally Present in the Environment |
|
SWTP Intake1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bromide (ppb) |
Y |
86.5 |
<5 - 180 |
5 |
||
SWTP Intake1 |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
1 SWTP Intake – Connection from the consolidated canal into Chandler’s Surface Water Treatment Plant. The water samples had not been treated or disinfected before testing.
Some average values could be less than the low range due to substituting
Public Notification of failure to report Synthetic Organic Chemical (SOC) results on time
The City of Chandler is required to report analytical results for the monitoring and reporting schedules established by the Safe Drinking Water Act. The results from SOC sampling at one of the City’s well sites, conducted during the first quarter of 2018, were incompletely reported. The City was returned to compliance once the missing forms were provided. As the data reported no detections of SOC’s at the well site, Chandler has no reason to believe that the late reporting had any impact on public health. The City is working with Regulators to ensure their agencies receive timely and complete reports.
Protecting Chandler’s Water Supply
Source Water Assessment and Protection Program (SWAP)
The Arizona Department of
Environmental Quality (ADEQ) completed a source water assessment for drinking water wells and surface water sources for Chandler’s public water system in 2005. The assessment reviewed adjacent land uses that may pose a potential risk to water
sources. These risks include, but are not limited to, gas stations, landfills, dry cleaners, agriculture fields, wastewater treatment plants, and mining activities. Once ADEQ identified the adjacent land uses, they were ranked on their potential to affect the water source.
All surface water sources are considered high risk due to their exposure to open air. The overall risk posed to surface water is addressed by EPA through its increased monitoring requirements for surface water sources.
Two of Chandler’s drinking water wells were considered high risk based on adjacent land use criteria. The Chandler public water system conducts regular monitoring of drinking water entering the distribution system from all wells to ensure land uses have not impacted the source water.
Based on the information currently available on the hydrogeological settings and the adjacent land uses that are in the specified proximity of the drinking water source(s) of this public water system, ADEQ has given a high risk designation for the degree to which this public water system drinking water source(s) are protected. A designation of high risk indicates there may be additional source water protection measures which can be implemented on the local level. This does not imply that the source water is contaminated nor does it mean that contamination is imminent. Rather, it simply states that land use activities or hydrogeological conditions exist that make the source water susceptible to possible future contamination. Further source water assessment documentation can be obtained by contacting ADEQ at
Backflow Prevention
The City of Chandler prevents contamination of the public water supply by requiring the installation, maintenance and inspection of thousands of backflow devices throughout the City. These devices ensure hazards originating on customer’s property and from temporary connections do not impair or alter the water in the City’s distribution system. Backflow pre- vention devices range from vacuum breakers on household hose bibs to large commercial
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Tips
“Be the solution to storm water pollution” – common storm water pollutants include sediment, motor oil and other vehicle fluids, pet waste, yard debris, metals, pesti- cides, fertilizers and herbicides, to name a few. For more information on storm water pollution prevention, please go to www.chandleraz.gov and
search “stormwater”.
Guidelines for Everyday Pollution Prevention – “Only Rain In the Storm Drain”
- Sweep yard debris and properly dispose of in the trash, rather than blowing or hosing into the street.
-
Contain pool or spa water on pri- vate property or dispose of it in the sanitary sewer cleanout asso- ciated with your home. Draining pool water into the street or other City
right-of-way is prohibited by City Code. For more information call480-782-3507 or search “pool drainage” at www.chandleraz.gov. - Use fertilizers and pesticides sparingly and as directed by the manufacturer.
- Pick up after your pet and properly dispose of the waste in the trash.
- Wash your car on a lawn or other unpaved surface, or use a commercial car wash.
- Always use a nozzle on your garden hose around the home. Do not let the water free flow into the street.
- Maintain vehicles to be free of leaks and do not park leaking vehicles on the street.
-
Do not
over-water your lawn. -
Report illegal dumping into streets and storm drains by call- ing
480-782-3503 or at www.chandleraz.gov. -
Minimize your purchase and use of hazardous products. Dispose of unused quantities properly. Please contact Solid Waste Services at
480-782-3510 for proper disposal guide- lines of hazardous waste materials such as used motor oil and other similar fluids.
Taste, Odor and Hardness
The EPA’s National Secondary Drinking Water Regulations are
Substance |
Guideline |
Range of Results (low – high) |
|
Alkalinity (ppm) |
NA |
77 - 230 |
|
Iron (ppm) |
0.3 mg/L |
0.09 – 0.93 |
|
pH |
6.5 – 8.5 |
7.2 – 8.5 |
|
Total Dissolved Solids (ppm) |
500 mg/L |
324 |
- 1350 |
Total Hardness (ppm; grains/gallon) |
NA |
104 |
– 381 mg/L / 6 |
Seasonal Changes in Flavor
The flavor of Chandler’s drinking water may change at certain times of the year, depending on the source. Chandler works with SRP to minimize algae in the canal system and to provide treatment at the SWTP to reduce
Arizona State University and the City of Chandler have partnered to routinely monitor for taste and odor precursors in the Consolidated Canal. This allows the treatment plant to have more precise control over taste and odor events and to better utilize resources and manage cost.
Santan Vista System Compliance Data 2020:
Who do I contact with questions about Chandler’s Drinking Water?
If you have any questions about your tap water or the infor- mation in this report, please call
Citizens who wish to address the City Council about water issues may do so at regularly scheduled City Council meetings normally held the 2nd and 4th Thursday of each month. The meetings are held at Chandler City Hall Council Chambers, 88 E. Chicago Street. For information about specific meeting times and agenda items, please contact the City Clerk’s office at
Inorganic Chemicals |
MCL |
Highest Level |
Range of All |
|
|
Sample |
|
|
Violation |
Samples |
MCL |
MCLG |
Month & |
Likely Source of Contamination |
|||
(IOC) |
Detected |
|||||||
Y or N |
|
|
Year |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Nitrate (ppm) |
N |
0.174 |
< 0.1 – 0.174 |
10 |
10 |
1/2020 |
Runoff from fertilizer use; leaching from septic tanks, |
|
sewage; erosion of natural deposits |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Synthetic Organic Chemicals |
MCL |
Highest Level |
Range of All |
|
|
Sample |
|
|
Violation |
Samples |
MCL |
MCLG |
Month & |
Likely Source of Contamination |
|||
(SOC) |
Detected |
|||||||
Y or N |
|
|
Year |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
N |
<0.0001 |
<0.0001 |
70 |
70 |
9/2020 |
Runoff from herbicide used on row crops |
||
|
MCL |
Highest Level |
Range of All |
|
|
Sample |
|
|
Disinfection |
Violation |
Samples |
MCL |
MCLG |
Month & |
Likely Source of Contamination |
||
Detected |
||||||||
|
Y or N |
|
|
Year |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Bromate (ppb) |
N |
7 |
1.2 - 7 |
10 |
N/A |
5/2020 |
Byproduct of drinking water disinfection |
|
Total Trihalomethanes (TTHM) |
N |
12 |
12 |
80 |
N/A |
1/2019 |
Byproduct of drinking water disinfection |
|
(ppb) |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
TT |
|
Range of All |
|
|
Sample |
|
|
Surface Water Treatment Rule |
Violation |
Average |
Samples |
TT |
MCLG |
Month & |
|
|
|
Y or N |
|
|
|
Year |
|
||
Total Organic Carbon Removal |
N |
19.92 |
11.80 – 30.00 |
15% - |
N/A |
9/2020 |
Naturally Present in the Environment |
|
Ratio % Removal |
25% |
Definitions:
Action Level (AL): The concentration of a contaminant, which if exceeded, triggers treatment or other requirements Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): The highest level of a con- taminant that is allowed in drinking water
Maximum Contaminant Level Goal (MCLG): The level of a con- taminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health
Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level (MRDL): The level of dis- infectant added for water treatment that may not be exceeded at the consumer’s tap
Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level Goal (MRDLG): The level of disinfectant added for treatment at which no known or anticipated adverse effect on health of persons would occur Minimum Reporting Limit (MRL): The smallest measured con-
centration of a substance that can be reliably measured by a given analytical method
Nephelometric Turbidity Units (NTU): A measure of water clarity
ppm: Parts per million or Milligrams per liter (mg/L). One ppm is equivalent to one gallon in one million gallons.
ppb: Parts per billion or Micrograms per liter (µg/L). One ppb is one thousand times smaller than a ppm.
Picocuries per liter (pCi/L): Measure of the radioactivity in water
Treatment Technique (TT): A required process intended to reduce the level of a contaminant in drinking water
Reminder
Always take extra precautions, the water may be safe to drink when it leaves the sewage treatment plant but it may pick up pollutants during its way to your tap. We advise that you ask locals or hotel staff about the water quality. Also, note that different cities have different water mineral contents.
Sources and Resources
Sources Cited
Chandler Tap Water
One of the most popular ways to get water in Chandler is by using a water bottle. These bottles can be found in all convenience stores and gas stations. The only problem with these is that you will probably end up having to carry several around with you all day long. Also, because it’s so easy to get, people will try to sell you water bottles at the pump and gas station. This means you need to be careful when walking around with one, as someone could try to sell you something else.
Another option for getting water in Chandler is by getting a bottled water delivery service. This way, you don’t have to worry about carrying around bottles all day long, and you don’t have to worry about getting in someone’s way. The downside to this is that the delivery person will likely know where you live, so you won’t get the same water you would have gotten if you simply went to the store. You also don’t know if they are using the freshest water available. It’s definitely a good way to get nice water, but you have to consider it an option versus just staying home and getting your own.
Finally, the best way to get great-tasting, local Arizona tap water is by going to your favorite filtration company. Most of these companies offer an entire range of water services, including both filtered and bottled water. And because they filter everything, you know that you’re getting the freshest water possible. It’s just a good way to go, and you can trust these guys to give you great-tasting water all the time.
Chandler Drinking Water
There are many places around the country where the quality of their drinking water is not of the highest standard, and in these situations the quality of the drinking water supplied by the municipality is questionable. In some instances, this includes the drinking water that is supplied by your local water treatment plant. When looking for a good water filter system, one of the main things that you will want to consider is whether or not it is certified by the Arizona Department of Health. This will ensure that it meets all standards, as well as having met all standards and regulations set by the state.
Another thing that you will want to consider when shopping for a drinking water filter system is whether or not it carries a guarantee. While you will find many manufacturers that will guarantee their products to be completely free of any type of defect or error, there will always be times when this is simply not the case. If you are buying a product that you cannot stand to not have to work at the least, then you may not be as willing to give up the money for it.
Of course, the biggest thing that you will want to look for in any drinking water filter is whether or not it is certified by the Environmental Protection Agency. This agency works closely with health officials and organizations such as the National Health and Wellness Club to test and certify any product that they carry. If a company does not meet these stringent requirements, then you should move on to another vendor. You should also keep in mind that not every water filter system will remove every type of impurity from your drinking water, so you should make sure that you have read all of the details and specifications about the system that you are considering. If it does not meet all of the requirements that you have, then it probably isn’t the right product for you.
Chandler Water Quality
Residents of Chandler have a lot to be concerned about when it comes to the quality of the water that is used for drinking, cooking, bathing, and other non-heated functions within their home. While there are many sources of this highly regarded natural resource, there are also some sources that will not pass quality control standards and can do damage to your home. There are two main water supply sources in Chandler, both of which serve to threaten the health and well-being of the residents of this Arizona community. These include the Waste Treatment Center (WTC) in downtown Chandler, and the Arizona Municipal Utility Authority (APS) itself.
The Waste Treatment Center has long had problems with its ability to treat dangerous levels of bacteria in the water, but despite this, continues to allow the water to be used in thousands of homes throughout the city. With such poor quality water in order to cook with, bathe in, and drink, many residents have expressed concerns over the years that they cannot turn on a faucet to bathe in or even to wash their hands in. This is the same center that also handles the testing and treatment of all of the general public’s water in the Chandler area.
Unfortunately, the APS doesn’t always test the quality of the local water that it provides, which makes it particularly hard for residents to know whether or not their water is acceptable to use. The APS is also responsible for maintaining the city’s water quality by testing it periodically and by making sure that all aspects of the water distribution system are kept in working order. However, with such poor water quality in the area, and with APS handling the majority of the water distribution for the city, there is little reason why Chandler water should be any different from the water distributed around the rest of the United States. All consumers need to do is invest a little bit of time to learn more about the quality of water in Chandler and then make the decision of whether or not it is worth it to purchase water from this source or to wait until a better quality alternative becomes available.
Chandler Safe Drinking Water
If you have lived in the desert for any length of time, you know that there is a special magic about “Chandler Safe Drinking Water”. The drinking water that comes from the underground aquifers of Chandler, Arizona is one of the purest available anywhere. In fact, it is considered to be one of the purest in the world. This is not by accident; it is the result of a long, hard process by the City of Chandler and its contractors.
This water supply was chosen as the source of the City’s drinking water because it was deemed the safest by the Arizona Corporation Commission. It is a filtered water supply, so we do not need to buy bottles or worry about leaving them out in the sun. They are delivered to your home through an underground tank system, which is like a large watertight bag. There is no chance of the water becoming contaminated since the water is filtered and then carefully transported.
A water softener is also added to this water to prevent it from becoming too hard. This process also removes any of the minerals that are naturally found in water. If you do not drink enough water, you will begin to experience symptoms such as headaches and stomachaches. If you have had cancer or other conditions, you should try to increase your water intake instead of decreasing it. All of these facts help make Chandler Safe Drinking Water a great choice for all of your drinking water needs.
Chandler Water Treatment
The city of Chandler, Arizona, is home to a large number of businesses and homeowners, making it a hot tourist locale for visitors. Although many of these establishments are aware that they can take advantage of water treatment systems in order to filter their own water, not everyone is aware of the fact that they can also get a great deal of help from a company such as Chandler Water Treatment. These companies are experts in providing both bottled water and whole house water filtration systems, so no one needs to worry about getting sick or risking the health of their family while they are away from home. These water treatment systems can be installed by any individual with ease, allowing them to enjoy safe, great-tasting water without worrying about the cleanliness of the water.
Of course, not everyone can afford to get a large water filtering system in their home. This is why many people turn to bottled water, which is still quite effective and quite affordable. However, many people who choose to bottle water in this fashion also fail to realize that these bottles are taking up valuable space in their homes, which they could be using to store more necessities. By filtering their own water at home, the family will not only save space but will also save money. Not only that but having a water treatment system in your home will also help make you much more aware of the chemicals that are present in the water that you drink, allowing you to make better choices the next time around.
Another advantage to these water treatment systems is the fact that they will help ensure that you are protecting your family from water-containing lead. Lead can cause a number of health problems in people of all ages, so it is always important to filter the water that you drink in order to avoid these problems. If you do not currently filter your water, then you should consider doing so as soon as possible. In addition to protecting your children, you will also be doing your part to make sure that the water is safe to drink for you and for future generations as well. There is no doubt that water treatment systems such as these are very useful and very affordable, and it is better to do as much as you can to protect the health of you and your family by making sure that the water that you are drinking is clean and pure.
Chandler Water System
If you have ever looked at some of the homes in Chandler, Arizona, you may wonder how they are able to afford such high-end water systems with such low water usage rates. Well, it is rather simple in the sense that these homes are built with ultra-modern plumbing and efficient heating and air conditioning systems. This allows for great savings on your water bill and gives you easy access to fresh, clean water in any areas of the home where the water lines are not accessible.
With most homeowners having a minimum of a one-inch water restriction on the main water supply pipe, you can easily see why you are getting so much water for so little use. These restrictions are put into place by the City of Chandler as a means to protect the public from the possible negative effects of large amounts of unused water. The restrictions help to protect the environment and reduce negative effects such as pollution from the treated water and the wastewater. These restrictions help keep the community’s water supply cleaner and safer for future generations.
Some residents of Chandler choose to have a city water source and even have a connection to a city water utility. However, this is not always necessary if you live in an area where there is a good water supply available to you. In these instances, you will have to find a water company that provides water to the individual homeowner such as yourself. Once you find a company that does this, the individual has the option of purchasing a connection to the water utility of their choice to have a continuous water supply throughout the home. Although this may be more expensive, the peace of mind of having clean, fresh water in the home is priceless. Whether it be from the tap or a connection, the ability to provide your family with clean, purified water is invaluable.